Lake Botanica
K-RERA · the public record
Aeropolis, a project of Sattva Group
Devanahalli · TRINAYANI REALTOR
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
89%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
63units not bookedof 1,001 · Q1 2026 filing
09 Jul 2026declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
78%
Q3 2025
85%
Q4 2025
89%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
09 Jul 2026
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
Studio Apartment 2
60
1BHK Type 1
121
1BHK Type 2A
11
2 BHK Type 3
11
2 BHK Type 1B
44
Studio Apartment 1
116
3 BHK Type 1A
22
1BHK Type 1A
22
3 BHK Type 1
77
3 BHK Type 3
66
2 BHK Type 2
55
2 BHK Type 1A
88
1BHK Type 2
143
3 BHK Type 2
11
2 BHK Type 1
121
2 BHK Type 4
33
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
10.3registered acres
97.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Aeropolis, a project of Sattva Group
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1250/303/PR/110522/004869
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion9 July 2026
Land area41,783 sq m (10.3 acres)
Homes registered1,001
Tower/wing entries9
Unit mix60 × Studio Apartment 2, 121 × 1BHK Type 1, 11 × 1BHK Type 2A, 11 × 2 BHK Type 3, 44 × 2 BHK Type 1B, 116 × Studio Apartment 1, 22 × 3 BHK Type 1A, 22 × 1BHK Ty
In context
Density97 homes per acre
Density in context75th percentile of 73 Devanahalli projects (median 67.4)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 1,001 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 43,006 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 90,653 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 41,783 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.361 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 9 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 791 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 579 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 190 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | BIAAPA/TP/CC/05/2021-22 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 05-08-2021 | |
| Project start date | 15-09-2021 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio Apartment 2 | 60 | 6% | 26 sqm |
| 1BHK Type 1 | 121 | 12% | 33 sqm |
| 1BHK Type 2A | 11 | 1% | 36 sqm |
| 2 BHK Type 3 | 11 | 1% | 53 sqm |
| 2 BHK Type 1B | 44 | 4% | 53 sqm |
| Studio Apartment 1 | 116 | 12% | 16 sqm |
| 3 BHK Type 1A | 22 | 2% | 59 sqm |
| 1BHK Type 1A | 22 | 2% | 33 sqm |
| 3 BHK Type 1 | 77 | 8% | 59 sqm |
| 3 BHK Type 3 | 66 | 7% | 59 sqm |
| 2 BHK Type 2 | 55 | 5% | 53 sqm |
| 2 BHK Type 1A | 88 | 9% | 53 sqm |
| 1BHK Type 2 | 143 | 14% | 36 sqm |
| 3 BHK Type 2 | 11 | 1% | 59 sqm |
| 2 BHK Type 1 | 121 | 12% | 53 sqm |
| 2 BHK Type 4 | 33 | 3% | 53 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block B (Studio Units) | 10 | 176 | 88 | 33.7 m |
| Block C- Wing 4 | 11 | 121 | 71 | 34.89 m |
| Block C- Wing 5 | 11 | 77 | 71 | 34.89 m |
| Block C- Wing 6 | 11 | 99 | 100 | 34.89 m |
| Block D- Wing 7 | 11 | 99 | 99 | 34.89 m |
| Block D- Wing 8 | 11 | 77 | 77 | 34.89 m |
| Block D- Wing 9 | 11 | 132 | 99 | 34.89 m |
| Block D- Wing 10 | 11 | 110 | 76 | 34.89 m |
Showing first 8 of 9 tower/wing rows.
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 1,001 official flat/unit rows, matching the 1,001 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 352 | 52.9-53.1 sqm | 27.3-28.6 sqm | 352 |
| 1 BHK | 297 | 33.1-36.1 sqm | 17.5-20.4 sqm | 147 (150 with 0) |
| 3 BHK | 176 | 59.9 sqm | 30.4-30.7 sqm | 176 |
| Studio Apartment 1 | 116 | 16.4 sqm | 9.1-9.3 sqm | 16 (100 with 0) |
| Studio Apartment 2 | 60 | 26.2 sqm | 13.6-13.8 sqm | 9 (51 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block B (Studio Units) | 176 | 16.4-26.2 sqm | 9.1-13.8 sqm | 25 (151 with 0) |
| Block D- Wing 9 | 132 | 36.1-59.9 sqm | 19.8-30.6 sqm | 104 (28 with 0) |
| Block C- Wing 4 | 121 | 33.1-59.9 sqm | 17.6-30.5 sqm | 71 (50 with 0) |
| Block D- Wing 10 | 110 | 33.1-59.9 sqm | 17.5-30.6 sqm | 77 (33 with 0) |
| Block D- Wing 11 | 110 | 33.1-59.9 sqm | 17.5-30.5 sqm | 77 (33 with 0) |
| Block C- Wing 6 | 99 | 52.9-59.9 sqm | 27.3-30.4 sqm | 99 |
| Block D- Wing 7 | 99 | 53.1-59.9 sqm | 27.5-30.5 sqm | 99 |
| Block C- Wing 5 | 77 | 33.1-59.9 sqm | 17.6-30.6 sqm | 71 (6 with 0) |
| Block D- Wing 8 | 77 | 53.1-59.9 sqm | 27.5-30.7 sqm | 77 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B101 | Block B (Studio Units) | 1 | Studio Apartment 2 | 26.2 sqm | 13.6 sqm | 0 |
| B102 | Block B (Studio Units) | 1 | Studio Apartment 2 | 26.2 sqm | 13.8 sqm | 0 |
| B103 | Block B (Studio Units) | 1 | Studio Apartment 2 | 26.2 sqm | 13.8 sqm | 0 |
| B104 | Block B (Studio Units) | 1 | Studio Apartment 2 | 26.2 sqm | 13.6 sqm | 0 |
| B105 | Block B (Studio Units) | 1 | Studio Apartment 2 | 26.2 sqm | 13.6 sqm | 1 |
| B106 | Block B (Studio Units) | 1 | Studio Apartment 2 | 26.2 sqm | 13.8 sqm | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
15 of 49 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 34 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing8 of 8 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
2 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 24-06-2019 | Udayagiri Water NOC.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 09-02-2021 | AeropolisCFE dated 9th Feb 2021 Issued from KSPC .pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 07-08-2020 | Aeropolis- SEIAA.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 23-01-2020 | AeropolisBESCOM NOC 1 1 1.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 18-11-2020 | AeropolisFire NOC 1 1 1.pdf |
| Labour and Education Department | Approved | 28-03-2022 | Labour cess.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 08-02-2016 | Aeropolis Airport NOC New 1 1 1.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 11-07-2019 | AeropolisBSNL NOC 1 1 1.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | Dhirendra Kumar Dhal | 221691 | 2008 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560093 |
| Engineer | M/s Innotech Engineering Consultant Pvt.Ltd. | BCC–BL/3.6-STRL.E.67:09-10 | 2010 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560078 |
| Architect | M/s Kembhavi Architecture Foundation | CA/2000/26684 | 1972 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560048 |
| Contractor | New Consolidated Constructions Co Ltd | - | 1946 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560052 |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹20.66 Cr collected from buyers, ₹15.48 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 78% → 89% (+11 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 938/1001 (94%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹95.16 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹70.27 Cr (0.74x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 78% to 89% across the filed QPR window.
- The builder has drawn 0.74x of buyer collections from escrow (about 74% of the ₹95 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹21.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank 33/1, Ulsoor Road, Bangalore IFSC Code : ICIC0003904 Pin Code : 560042. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 19 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 4 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 19 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 27 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 28 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 31 km |
| Electronic City | 41 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.