Meda THE Water Edge
K-RERA · the public record
Meadow in the sun
Bengaluru East · Inner spaces
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a villa? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your villa, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best villas.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project · Sterling Villa Grande — Phase II · earlier comprehensive example
Two curved rows. Different lake-side choices.
A radial fronts the oval across the loop road; B radial faces the outer drive. The report compares all six villa types, from pool-equipped A to three-bedroom B and smaller C, with all 74 registered villa numbers. The March 2026 completion application’s three unsold homes are not identified; these are not live availability recommendations.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Sterling Villa Grande — Phase II sample report ↗
31 Dec 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
144registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Residential apartement
144
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
4.8registered acres
29.8registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Meadow in the sun
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/180131/000544
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2019
Land area19,523 sq m (4.8 acres)
Homes registered144
Tower/wing entries9
Unit mix144 × Residential apartement
In context
Density29.8 homes per acre
Density in context10th percentile of 1123 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.5)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 144 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 42,416 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 19,523 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~2.01 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈39,166 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 19,523 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 9 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 288 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 04-12-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential apartement | 144 | 100% | 42,416 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 8 | 6 | 12 | - |
| B | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| C | 9 | 18 | 36 | - |
| D | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| E | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| F | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| G | 9 | 18 | 36 | - |
| H | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
Showing first 8 of 9 tower/wing rows.
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 144 official flat/unit rows, matching the 144 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | 144 | 960.0-3,958.0 sqft | 452.0-1,883.0 sqft | 288 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 18 | 960.0-3,502.0 sqft | 452.0-1,661.0 sqft | 36 |
| G | 18 | 1,676.0-3,958.0 sqft | 789.0-1,883.0 sqft | 36 |
| B | 17 | 960.0-3,502.0 sqft | 452.0-1,620.0 sqft | 34 |
| D | 17 | 2,040.0-3,502.0 sqft | 970.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| E | 17 | 2,040.0-3,502.0 sqft | 970.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| F | 17 | 1,240.0-3,509.0 sqft | 573.0-1,665.0 sqft | 34 |
| H | 17 | 2,040.0-3,502.0 sqft | 970.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| I | 17 | 1,232.0-3,502.0 sqft | 593.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| A | 6 | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 12 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A301 | A | 3 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A401 | A | 4 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A501 | A | 5 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A601 | A | 6 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A701 | A | 7 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A801 | A | 8 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
⚠ 1 of 23 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Commencement Certificate.
1 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 Dec 2020 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 19 Jan 2021 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/210119/000544) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (9 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRADEEP KUMAR DODLE vs INNER SPACES | Request intervention in continuation of maintenance by the promoter / builder till handover to the association after OC | AUTHORITY | 31/01/2024 |
| NITYA CHALLAM vs INNER SPACES | Fair Maintainance , essential services | AUTHORITY | 31/01/2024 |
| NITHYA CHELLAM vs INNER SPACES | Refund or Compensation | AUTHORITY | 27/03/2023 |
| MR.SUNIL SURANA vs M/S.INNER SPACES | Seeking a total relief of Rs. 16,45,350 from the Builder as per Construction Agreement. | AUTHORITY | 23/08/2023 |
| PRADEEP KUMAR DODLE vs INNER SPACES | I seek compensation for the delay from the promoter / builder Innerspaces under RERA ACT 2016 | AUTHORITY | 17/02/2023 |
| VISHWANATH & SUDHA VISHWANATH vs INNER SPACES | Seek compensation for delayed handover at the rate as per committed in the construction agreement clause no. 10 | AUTHORITY | 17/02/2023 |
| Vishwanath vs INNER SPACES | The developer be told to facilitate the formation of RWA and maintain the property till such time. RWA formation has been initiated but it takes time. | AUTHORITY | 10/11/2022 |
| Kenneth Eric Sequeira vs M/s.Inner Spaces | To get the builder to pay interest on delay period as per agreement. | AUTHORITY | 06/07/2026 |
| MS.NITHYA CHELLAM vs M/S.INNER SPACES | compensation for delay | AUTHORITY | 03/11/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (9 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210925/0008378 25-09-2021 | Promoter / Builder denying maintenance & threatening to withdraw essential services | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210926/0008379 26-09-2021 | Delay in committed delivery date | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210926/0008381 26-09-2021 | Builder is not ready to maintain property | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210926/0008382 26-09-2021 | Delayed handover by more than a year | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/210929/0008396 29-09-2021 | Breach of sale and construction agreement | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210929/0008398 29-09-2021 | Delay Compensation for Delayed Completion | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211018/0008448 18-10-2021 | Denial of service and refund for Lawn and Solar heater | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220125/0008870 25-01-2022 | Breach of Sale Agreement. Failure to Perform as mentioned in the agreement | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹62.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Sarjapur road. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 4 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 4 km |
| Electronic City | 6 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 11 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.