MSR Passion Square
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Inner spaces · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/180131/000544
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 4 approved drawings and 23 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Gurugram colony’s approved papers: 392.997 sq m already used of the 396 allowed — the promised extra room can never be built.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →Meadow in the sun occupies 4.8 acres with 9 towers and 144 residential apartments registered, estimated at ₹90.0 crore. Its density of 29.8 homes per acre is the 10th percentile among 1118 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.7). Its declared completion date of 31 December 2019 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Meadow In The Sun is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/180131/000544, and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Dec 2019.
31 Dec 2019
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Meadow In The Sun spans 19,523 sq m (4.82 acres), comprises 9 towers, registers 144 units, and is declared to cost ₹90 cr.
₹90 cr
declared project cost
4.82acres
19,523 sq m
144units
on the registration
39166.0FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the plot to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 144 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 42,416 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 19,523 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~2.01 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈39,166 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 19,523 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered towers/wings | 9 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 288 total (0 open) — 2.00 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 04-12-2015 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential apartement | 144 | 100% | 42,416 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 8 | 6 | 12 | - |
| B | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| C | 9 | 18 | 36 | - |
| D | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| E | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| F | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| G | 9 | 18 | 36 | - |
| H | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
Showing first 8 of 9 tower/wing rows.
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 144 official flat/unit rows, matching the 144 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | 144 | 960.0-3,958.0 sqft | 452.0-1,883.0 sqft | 288 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 18 | 960.0-3,502.0 sqft | 452.0-1,661.0 sqft | 36 |
| G | 18 | 1,676.0-3,958.0 sqft | 789.0-1,883.0 sqft | 36 |
| B | 17 | 960.0-3,502.0 sqft | 452.0-1,620.0 sqft | 34 |
| D | 17 | 2,040.0-3,502.0 sqft | 970.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| E | 17 | 2,040.0-3,502.0 sqft | 970.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| F | 17 | 1,240.0-3,509.0 sqft | 573.0-1,665.0 sqft | 34 |
| H | 17 | 2,040.0-3,502.0 sqft | 970.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| I | 17 | 1,232.0-3,502.0 sqft | 593.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| A | 6 | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 12 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A301 | A | 3 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A401 | A | 4 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A501 | A | 5 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A601 | A | 6 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A701 | A | 7 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A801 | A | 8 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which plot to ask for · Drawings Report
The plot-level read: which parts of the layout to prefer and which to avoid, what the approved layout puts against each boundary — roads, drains, open land — and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
⚠ 1 of 23 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Commencement Certificate.
1 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 Dec 2020 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 19 Jan 2021 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/210119/000544) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (9 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRADEEP KUMAR DODLE vs INNER SPACES | Request intervention in continuation of maintenance by the promoter / builder till handover to the association after OC | AUTHORITY | 31/01/2024 |
| NITYA CHALLAM vs INNER SPACES | Fair Maintainance , essential services | AUTHORITY | 31/01/2024 |
| NITHYA CHELLAM vs INNER SPACES | Refund or Compensation | AUTHORITY | 27/03/2023 |
| MR.SUNIL SURANA vs M/S.INNER SPACES | Seeking a total relief of Rs. 16,45,350 from the Builder as per Construction Agreement. | AUTHORITY | 23/08/2023 |
| PRADEEP KUMAR DODLE vs INNER SPACES | I seek compensation for the delay from the promoter / builder Innerspaces under RERA ACT 2016 | AUTHORITY | 17/02/2023 |
| VISHWANATH & SUDHA VISHWANATH vs INNER SPACES | Seek compensation for delayed handover at the rate as per committed in the construction agreement clause no. 10 | AUTHORITY | 17/02/2023 |
| Vishwanath vs INNER SPACES | The developer be told to facilitate the formation of RWA and maintain the property till such time. RWA formation has been initiated but it takes time. | AUTHORITY | 10/11/2022 |
| Kenneth Eric Sequeira vs M/s.Inner Spaces | To get the builder to pay interest on delay period as per agreement. | AUTHORITY | 06/07/2026 |
| MS.NITHYA CHELLAM vs M/S.INNER SPACES | compensation for delay | AUTHORITY | 03/11/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (9 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210925/0008378 25-09-2021 | Promoter / Builder denying maintenance & threatening to withdraw essential services | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210926/0008379 26-09-2021 | Delay in committed delivery date | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210926/0008381 26-09-2021 | Builder is not ready to maintain property | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210926/0008382 26-09-2021 | Delayed handover by more than a year | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/210929/0008396 29-09-2021 | Breach of sale and construction agreement | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210929/0008398 29-09-2021 | Delay Compensation for Delayed Completion | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211018/0008448 18-10-2021 | Denial of service and refund for Lawn and Solar heater | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220125/0008870 25-01-2022 | Breach of Sale Agreement. Failure to Perform as mentioned in the agreement | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹62.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Sarjapur road. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
The nearest major job hub is ~4 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 4 km |
| Electronic City | 6 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 11 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 4 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get Meadow in the sun approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For Meadow in the sun, one reading of it goes further. Which plot should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the plots, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Century OneWorld Seraya → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which plot to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Inner Spaces.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Meadow In The Sun?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026