Cornerstone Akhinta Residences
K-RERA · the public record
ND PASSION ELITE
Bengaluru South · ND DEVELOERS
Is this the right project?
Which home should you choose?
Read the free RERA facts below. For help choosing a home or comparing a price, select a report.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Dec 2018declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
152registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.8registered acres
53.8registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for ND PASSION ELITE
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/180313/000661
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2018
Land area11,432 sq m (2.8 acres)
Homes registered152
Tower/wing entries5
In context
Density53.8 homes per acre
Density in context21st percentile of 791 Bengaluru South projects (median 77.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 152 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 11,432 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 152 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 23 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 259 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 29-05-2013 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elite BLOCK-A | 7 | 30 | 30 | - |
| Elite Block-B | 7 | 29 | 29 | - |
| Elite Block- C | 7 | 29 | 29 | - |
| Elite Block-D | 7 | 32 | 32 | - |
| Elite Block-E | 7 | 32 | 32 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 152 official flat/unit rows, matching the 152 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 117 | 1,216.0-2,278.0 sqft | 467.0-894.0 sqft | 212 |
| 2BHK | 19 | 1,028.0-2,278.0 sqft | 400.0-1,290.0 sqft | 22 |
| 4BHK | 16 | 1,829.0-2,278.0 sqft | 725.0-921.0 sqft | 32 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elite Block-D | 32 | 1,028.0-1,216.0 sqft | 400.0-1,290.0 sqft | 32 |
| Elite Block-E | 32 | 1,421.0-1,583.0 sqft | 547.0-636.0 sqft | 64 |
| Elite BLOCK-A | 30 | 1,216.0-2,278.0 sqft | 467.0-894.0 sqft | 54 |
| Elite Block- C | 29 | 1,421.0-1,829.0 sqft | 547.0-725.0 sqft | 58 |
| Elite Block-B | 29 | 1,421.0-2,278.0 sqft | 563.0-921.0 sqft | 58 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-G01 | Elite BLOCK-A | 0 | 3BHK | 1,421.0 sqft | 565.0 sqft | 2 |
| A-G02 | Elite BLOCK-A | 0 | 3BHK | 1,216.0 sqft | 467.0 sqft | 1 |
| A-G03 | Elite BLOCK-A | 0 | 3BHK | 1,541.0 sqft | 618.0 sqft | 2 |
| A-G04 | Elite BLOCK-A | 0 | 3BHK | 1,421.0 sqft | 565.0 sqft | 2 |
| A-101 | Elite BLOCK-A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,463.0 sqft | 577.0 sqft | 2 |
| A-102 | Elite BLOCK-A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,216.0 sqft | 501.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
4 of 14 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 10 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 Dec 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 22 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/220622/000661) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Not identified in the document list
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Not identified in the document list
Fire NOCNot identified in the document list
Pollution control (KSPCB)Not identified in the document list
Environmental clearanceNot identified in the document list
Airport Authority height clearanceNot identified in the document list
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (39 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sreenath R Kartha vs ND PASSION ELITE | Direct the respondents to pay the complainants compensation for inordinate delay in handing over the physical possession of residential flat No. G01 B Block as mentioned in facts of complaint above | AUTHORITY | 26/07/2024 |
| SUNIL PUTTY vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Completion / OC of the apartment and compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| KANCHAN ROY vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Compensation as claimed in complainant facts | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Debashis Mohanty vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | ND Elite project with OC and compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Soya Joseph vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Possession of Flat with Compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Deepa Nair vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Compensation and refund | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Sreejit Nair vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Possession of Flat by Dec 2019 or Compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Balamurugan J vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Timely delivery of flat and compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| manish bhargava vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Possession of Flat Required with compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Mr. MANSURALI. M. FAROQUI vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Compensation and Delivery of ND Passion Elite Flat | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Viraj Nayak vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Possession of flat with compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Rakesh Kumar Verma vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Compensation and Delivery of Flat ND Passion Elite | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Compensation Amount and Delivery of the Project | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| SAI VENKAT KUMAR vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | compensation and possession of the flat | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Haritha Krishna Vijapurapu vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Completed apartment or full refund compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Sachin Gupta vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | To ensure prompt completion of project otherwise full payment made to promoter with interest to be refunded | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| MANISH DUBEY vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Property Delivery from builder with compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| KRISHNA KUMAR.P vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Cancel the contract and refund all the money paid till date with interest, along with the financial compensation for the financial loss | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| SHUBHASHIS SENGUPTA vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delivering flat/interest | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| AKSHAY T S vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delivering flat/interest/rent | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| SANTOSH SRINIVASAN vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delivery of Flat & Interest/compensation for delay | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| RAKESH A SHETTY vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delivering flat/interest/rent | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| VIRAJ SHETTY vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delivering flat / interest / rent | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| MONISH GANDHI vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delivering flat/interest/rent | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| T JANAKIRAM vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delivering Flat/Interest/Rent | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| MANIGANDAN P G vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delivering flat/Interest/Rent/Pre-EMI Dues | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| VIJAYALAXMI HIREMATH vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Saleconsideration/deliveryofflat/costofproceedings | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| ANUPAMA RAMESH vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delay in delivery; Rental compensation for delay; 10% interest per annum on total sale consideration paid to the Respondent | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| POORNIMA MURTHY vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delivering flat/interest/rent | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| SATISH SANKARAN vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Non delivery of flat/rental compensation/ interest of 10 percent on total sale consideration. | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| ANJALI SHARAN AND RITESH RAUSHAN vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | As per "Interim Prayer" in "Facts of Complaint" | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| MAINAK GHOSH vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | DELIVERY OF FLAT AND PAYMENTS OF EMIS DEFALTED WITH FULL COMPENSATION DUE TO LOSS OF INTEREST AND RENTS | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| NABARUN D PURKAYASTHA AND MEGHNA D PURKAYASTHA vs M.K.K DURANI AND MRS. AYESHA SULTANA | Delivering flat/interest/rent | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| CHIRENJEET JAGANNATH vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Flat Delivery / Interest Compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| SRAJAN TIWARI vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD | Delay in Delivery of Flat/ Rental Compensation/ 10% interest on Total Sale consideration paid to the respondant | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| K VIMALKUMAR vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD SANDEEP .S N. SRINIVAS REDDY JAYALAKSHMI REDDY | RERA Compensation for Builder Share Attached in this application. | AUTHORITY | 24/05/2024 |
| C MOSES vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD SANDEEP S N SRINIVAS REDDY JAYALAKSHMI REDDY | RERA Compensation for Builder Share Attached in this application | AUTHORITY | 23/05/2024 |
| J RUBY GRACE vs ND DEVELOERS PVT LTD SANDEEP S N SRINIVAS REDDY JAYALAKSHMI REDDY | RERA Compensation for Builder Share Attached in this application | AUTHORITY | 23/05/2024 |
| BRAHMA KUMAR JWALENDRA vs ND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND 3 OTHERS | To complete the residential flat bearing No. D204, An interest of 18% per annum on total amount paid to till date, handover possession, Rs. 35,000/- towards litigation expenses,Cost of the proceedings | AUTHORITY | 13/06/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (36 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190822/0003713 22-08-2019 | Villa C-15: wanted to execute sale agreement as per initial agreement. | ND AROUND THE MANGOES (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190924/0004248 24-09-2019 | Delivery date as mentioned in Sale Agreement of my flat no. D303 of ND Passion Elite is expired and possession of my flat D303 has not been given to me yet. | ND PASSION ELITE | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190924/0004288 24-09-2019 | Delay in possession of ND Passion elite project | ND PASSION ELITE | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190924/0004294 24-09-2019 | Delayed possession of flat in ND Passion Elite Apt project | ND PASSION ELITE | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190924/0004300 24-09-2019 | Delay in Handover of ND Passion Elite Flats | ND PASSION ELITE | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190926/0004239 26-09-2019 | Delivery deadline delayed for apartment D601 | ND PASSION ELITE | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190926/0004324 26-09-2019 | Delay in possession of E101 flat in ND Passion ELite | ND PASSION ELITE | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190928/0004332 28-09-2019 | Delay in possession and compensation | ND PASSION ELITE | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | VERNEKAR ASSOCIATES | - | 2004 | Karnataka 560095, bangalore |
| Structural engineer | . ISA Structural Studio | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹36.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: UNITED BANK OF INDIA BTM LAYOUT (IFSC UBIN0556521, a/c …0121). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload from Jul 2017.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 5 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 6 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 11 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 13 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.