K-RERA · the public record
Oak Leaf
Anekal · Suvastu Estates
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
0.8registered acres
0.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Oak Leaf
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/180509/001676
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered land area | 3,414 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 80 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 80 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-09-2016 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 18 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 Dec 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 22 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/220622/001676) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (7 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| GIRISH NATARAJAN vs OAK LEAF | Completion of the Project with all promised amenities | AUTHORITY | 20/07/2023 |
| INDRANEEL SENGUPTA vs OAK LEAF | Permanent BESCOM connection, Lifts and other amenities to be provided by builder as promised. | AUTHORITY | 20/07/2023 |
| SUMEET KUMAR vs OAK LEAF | Help to complete the project and handover to the buyers | AUTHORITY | 20/07/2023 |
| VIJAY KUMAR PUJAR vs OAK LEAF | Completion of Project with the above all things and promised Amenities | AUTHORITY | 20/07/2023 |
| ALOK BHARDWAJ vs OAK LEAF | Completion of project with all promised amenities | AUTHORITY | 20/07/2023 |
| MD. JUNED AHMAD ASNARI vs OAK LEAF | Completion of project as promised by the builder with all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 20/07/2023 |
| DEVYANI KUNDU vs OAK LEAF | Please do something so that we can get permanent electricity and water. | AUTHORITY | 20/07/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (7 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/211204/0008673 04-12-2021 | Project Not Completed | Oak Leaf | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/211204/0008677 04-12-2021 | Delayed Project | Oak Leaf | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/211206/0008683 06-12-2021 | No permanent BESCOM connection along with amenities as promised | Oak Leaf | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/211206/0008689 06-12-2021 | Delayed Project | Oak Leaf | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/211207/0008699 07-12-2021 | Delayed project | Oak Leaf | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/211208/0008702 08-12-2021 | Delayed Project | Oak Leaf | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/211214/0008717 14-12-2021 | Project not completed, No BESCOM or Kaveri Water supply. | Oak Leaf | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 1 project professional/vendor row across Architect. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Basavaraj | - | 2012 | opposite to MS Ramiah, BEL Road |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
The estimated cost above is the developer's declared construction cost only (K-RERA's own label: "Estimated Cost of Construction as certified by Engineer") — it excludes land cost, so it isn't comparable to the buyer-collection figures below or to a sale price.
RERA 70% project account is on file: BANK OF INDIA HSR Layout (IFSC BKID0008438, a/c …0230). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 2 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 2 km |
| Electronic City | 8 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 10 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 10 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 16 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 32 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.