Concorde Abode 99
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Janapriya Engineers Syndicate · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171026/000675
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 4 approved drawings and 16 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →Pinegrove occupies 20,916 sq m (5.2 acres) and has 119 residential apartments registered, spread across one tower with an estimated project cost of ₹138.0 crore. At 23 homes per acre it sits at the 5th percentile of 784 Bengaluru South projects on this register (median 77.3). Its declared completion date of 31 December 2024 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Pinegrove is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171026/000675, and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Dec 2024.
31 Dec 2024
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Pinegrove spans 20,916 sq m (5.17 acres), comprises 1 tower, registers 119 units, and is declared to cost ₹138 cr.
₹138 cr
declared project cost
5.17acres
20,916 sq m
119units
on the registration
2.24FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 119 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 12,046 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 20,916 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.24 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 175 total (38 open) — 1.47 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 31-07-2017 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| residential apartments | 119 | 100% | 12,046 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CANARY ISLAND | 14 | 119 | 175 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 119 official flat/unit rows, matching the 119 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 119 | 96.3-109.3 sqm | 69.7-86.0 sqm | 128 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CANARY ISLAND | 119 | 96.3-109.3 sqm | 69.7-86.0 sqm | 128 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C001 | CANARY ISLAND | 0 | 3BHK | 96.3 sqm | 69.7 sqm | 1 |
| C002 | CANARY ISLAND | 0 | 3BHK | 96.3 sqm | 69.7 sqm | 1 |
| C003 | CANARY ISLAND | 0 | 3BHK | 96.3 sqm | 69.7 sqm | 1 |
| C004 | CANARY ISLAND | 0 | 3BHK | 96.3 sqm | 69.7 sqm | 1 |
| C005 | CANARY ISLAND | 0 | 3BHK | 105.3 sqm | 78.5 sqm | 1 |
| C006 | CANARY ISLAND | 0 | 3BHK | 109.3 sqm | 81.1 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 16 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2024, extended (Covid Extension) to 30 Sep 2025 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT WITHDRAWL) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (18 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUMAR RAHUL vs JANAPRIYA ENGINEERS | Please direct the promoters to return money without any penalty and with any interest deemed appropriate by RERA authorities | AUTHORITY | 20/04/2023 |
| Krishna Mohan Kakani vs M/s.Janapriya Engineers Syndicate | Project Completion with all promised Amenities | AUTHORITY | 20/01/2026 |
| naveenkurella vs M/s.Janapriya Engineers Syndicate and others | Project Completion, Basic Amenities & COmpensation | AUTHORITY | 20/01/2026 |
| Tariq Anwar vs M/s.Janapriya Engineers Syndicate and others | Project Completion, Basic Amenities and Boundary wall. | AUTHORITY | 16/01/2026 |
| Suman Kumar Sinha vs M/s.Janapriya Engineers Syndicate and others | Project Completion, Basic Amenities & Compensation | AUTHORITY | 16/01/2026 |
| Guruprakash S vs M/s.Janapriya Engineers Syndicate and others | Project Completion, Basic Amenities & Compensation | AUTHORITY | 16/01/2026 |
| Ritesh Gupta vs M/s.Janapriya Engineers Syndicate and others | Project Completion, Basic Amenities & Compensation | AUTHORITY | 16/01/2026 |
| Sreekumar E N vs M/s.Janapriya engineers Syndicate and others | Project Completion, Basic Amenities & Compensation | AUTHORITY | 16/01/2026 |
| Raj Sekhar Chowdhury vs M/s.Janapriya Engineers Syndcate and others | Project completion, basic amenities and compensation | AUTHORITY | 16/01/2026 |
| Krishna Gopal Vijayvargiya vs M/S.JANAYAPRIYA ENGINEERS SYNDICATE PVT LTD | Compensation for delay in agreed amenities at bank interest plus margin till all amenities are completed. Builder should give a definite timeplan for completion of pending activities | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2025 |
| PRATEEK UJJWAL vs JANAPRIYA ENGINEERS SYNDICATE PRIVATE LIMITED | Compensation & Possession | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2022 |
| Prateek Ujjwal vs M/S.Janapriya Engineers Syndicate and others | Project Completion, Basic Amenities & COmpensation | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
| jitendriya parida vs M/S.Janapriya Engineers Syndicate and others | Project Completion & Compensation | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
| Kapil Kumar vs M/s.Janapriya Engineers Syndicate and others | Getting transparency and commitment with date from Builder & Land Owner regarding the completion of amenities and obtaining Partial OC. | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
| Amar Kumar Anand vs M/S.JANAPRIYA ENGINEERS SYNDICATE AND OTHERS | Completion of project with promised amenities | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
| Sameer Manocha vs M/s.Janapriya Engineers Syndicate and others | Project Completion, Basic Amenities & Compensation | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
| DELTA FIRE SAFETY SOLUTIONS vs JANAPRIYA ENGINEERS | I request that you please get the necessary documents from the builder | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2026 |
| Mrs Bharati Devi Goenka vs M/S.JANAPRIYA ENGINEERS SYNDICATE AND OTHERS | Builder to pay the interest on delay period, complete the project with all amenities and register the Sale Deed in favour of the Purchaser. | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (7 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200301/0005597 01-03-2020 | Delay in delivery by more than 2.5 years | Pinegrove | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/200820/0006395 20-08-2020 | Delayed project by Janapriya for over 5 years | Pinegrove | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/220806/0009860 06-08-2022 | Compensation & Delayed Construction | Pinegrove | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/221216/0010471 16-12-2022 | Incomplete property, delayed timelines, security risks & ignorant behaviour of the builder | Pinegrove | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221216/0010472 16-12-2022 | Incomplete property, delayed timelines, security risks & ignorant behaviour of the builder | Pinegrove | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221219/0010482 19-12-2022 | Incomplete Property, delayed timelines, security risks & ignorant behaviour of the builder and landowners. | Pinegrove | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221221/0010510 21-12-2022 | Incomplete property, delayed timelines, security risks & ignorant behavior of the builder | Pinegrove | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹116.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank SADASHIVNAGAR (IFSC UTIB0001887, a/c …6261). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
The nearest major job hub is ~4 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 4 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 7 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 13 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 15 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 21 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 37 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 4 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get Pinegrove approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For Pinegrove, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Janapriya Engineers.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Pinegrove?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026