GR Sitara
K-RERA · the public record
Raindance
Anekal · Countryside E city
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 May 2021declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
124registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Apartments
124
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
1.9registered acres
66.1registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Raindance
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/180119/002145
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 May 2021
Land area7,591 sq m (1.9 acres)
Homes registered124
Tower/wing entries2
Unit mix124 × Apartments
In context
Density66.1 homes per acre
Density in context36th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 124 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 12,263 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 7,591 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~2.24 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈17,035 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 7,591 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 153 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 129 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-08-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apartments | 124 | 100% | 12,263 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRRUS | 13 | 62 | 78 | - |
| NIMBUS | 13 | 62 | 75 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 124 official flat/unit rows, matching the 124 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 100 | 96.4-108.9 sqm | 657.2-750.4 sqm | 0 (100 with 0) |
| 2BHK | 24 | 75.4-80.3 sqm | 517.2-557.6 sqm | 0 (24 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRRUS | 62 | 80.3-108.9 sqm | 557.6-750.4 sqm | 0 (62 with 0) |
| NIMBUS | 62 | 75.4-106.8 sqm | 517.2-729.0 sqm | 0 (62 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | CIRRUS | 1 | 3BHK | 108.9 sqm | 750.4 sqm | 0 |
| 102 | CIRRUS | 1 | 2BHK | 80.3 sqm | 557.6 sqm | 0 |
| 103 | CIRRUS | 1 | 3BHK | 97.0 sqm | 671.3 sqm | 0 |
| 104 | CIRRUS | 1 | 3BHK | 96.4 sqm | 671.2 sqm | 0 |
| 105 | CIRRUS | 1 | 3BHK | 96.5 sqm | 677.3 sqm | 0 |
| 201 | CIRRUS | 2 | 3BHK | 108.9 sqm | 750.4 sqm | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 23 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 May 2021, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 25 Feb 2023 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 02 Sep 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/220902/002145) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Document listed: BESCOM
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Not identified in the document list
Fire NOCNot identified in the document list
Pollution control (KSPCB)Not identified in the document list
Environmental clearanceNot identified in the document list
Airport Authority height clearanceDocument listed: Airport Authority of India
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (10 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abhishek Pandey vs Countryside E city LLP | Project completion and handover per sale agreement | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Rajitha Nair vs Countryside E city LLP | Seeking justice in getting the flats ready as promised with all the amenities by end of Septemeber 2023 and also a compensation for the delay in the completion of the project since March 2023. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| DHANUSH vs Countryside E city LLP | Promoter should release the Flats with Hebitable condition at the earliest, else Coutryside has to pay the Bank EMI intrest every month, also the compensation from March'23.. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Dhanapal vs Countryside E city LLP | Immediate completion of project. Compensation if amenities not delivered as promised or delay in possession | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Padmini Chetan Parmar vs Countryside E city LLP | Compensation for project delay and there should be no deviation as per agreement and marketing brochure which was provided during flat booking. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Sreehari K V vs Countryside E city LLP | Expedited Possession , Enforcement of Promised Specifications, Compensation for Delay, Investigation into Fund Utilization, Penalties for Misrepresentation | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Thomas Mathew vs Countryside E city LLP | Compensation for the delay in project delivery and adherance to the promised set of amenities. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Shashank R vs Countryside E city LLP | Interest on delay period and handing over the property as soon as possible | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Shanmuga Prabhu vs Countryside E city LLP | Request to complete the project and provide interest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| PRANKUR CHAUDHARY vs COUNTRYSIDE E CITY LLP & OTHERS | I want RERA to take strict ACTION against the builder and force him to keep all his promises he made to the buyers without compromising on quality | AUTHORITY | 11/03/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹36.3 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Bank of Baroda Jayanagar 3rd Block (IFSC BARB0JAYANA, a/c …1025). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 1 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 1 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 12 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 17 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 18 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 24 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 41 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.