Raja Platino
K-RERA · the public record
RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1
Bengaluru East · RAJA HOUSING
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Jan 2021declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
220registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
1 BHK
10
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
3.5registered acres
62.9registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/171028/001242
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 January 2021
Land area14,144 sq m (3.5 acres)
Homes registered220
Tower/wing entries5
Unit mix10 × 1 BHK
In context
Density62.9 homes per acre
Density in context32nd percentile of 1123 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.5)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 220 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 510 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 14,144 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 1,400 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-08-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BHK | 10 | 100% | 510 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block 5 | 4 | 50 | 280 | - |
| block 6 | 4 | 50 | 280 | - |
| block 7 | 4 | 40 | 280 | - |
| block 8 | 4 | 40 | 280 | - |
| block 9 | 4 | 40 | 280 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 220 official flat/unit rows, matching the 220 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 114 | 745.4-999.2 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 114 |
| 3BHK | 95 | 875.3-1,139.6 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 95 |
| 1BHK | 10 | 476.2-594.9 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 10 |
| 2.5BHK | 1 | 875.3 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 1 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block 5 | 50 | 477.7-1,004.2 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 50 |
| block 6 | 50 | 476.2-1,005.2 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 50 |
| block 7 | 40 | 593.2-1,139.6 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 40 |
| block 8 | 40 | 593.2-1,139.6 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 40 |
| block 9 | 40 | 593.2-1,139.6 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 40 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Block 5 | 0 | 3BHK | 1,000.0 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 1 |
| 2 | Block 5 | 0 | 3BHK | 1,003.6 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 1 |
| 3 | Block 5 | 0 | 1BHK | 477.7 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 1 |
| 4 | Block 5 | 0 | 2BHK | 788.1 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 1 |
| 5 | Block 5 | 0 | 2BHK | 745.8 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 1 |
| 6 | Block 5 | 0 | 2BHK | 745.8 sqft | 290,850.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 36 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Jan 2021, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 Oct 2022 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 27 Dec 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/221227/001242) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (29 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RATHIN PAUL vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | 1. Raja housing Ltd should start paying me compensation starting from 1Nov2021 till the project completion date. 2. Requesting RERA to not provide further extension of completion date to this project. | AUTHORITY | 28/11/2022 |
| JYOTI RANJAN MOHANTY & PRIYA SHARMA vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | 1. Please ensure that the project completes on time and we get compensation for each delayed period. Please do not provide any extension to the project as the delay seems very much intentional. | AUTHORITY | 27/09/2022 |
| ARIJIT DEY vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | 1. Raja Housing Limited should start paying me delayed compensation as per sales agreement from 1st November 2021till project completion date. 2. Requesting RERA to not provide any further extension | AUTHORITY | 27/09/2022 |
| KARTHI J & MRS. GOWRI SANKARI vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Settlement of Delay Compensation till the date of receiving OC / Registration and proper full Handover. | AUTHORITY | 21/12/2022 |
| SantoshKumar N V vs Raja Housing Limited | Need Compensation amount from Sept 2020 till date | AUTHORITY | 21/03/2023 |
| Vikash Gupta vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Raja Housing Ltd should pay compensation as per agreement from November 2021 till the possession date. | AUTHORITY | 19/12/2022 |
| Suresh Turkani vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | No extension should be provided to builder and intervention needed to ensure builder adhere to RERA and deliver flat ASAP with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 19/12/2022 |
| Tanaya Jana vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | either builder should pay the due compensation or they must adjust it with next disbursement. | AUTHORITY | 19/12/2022 |
| Sapna Ks vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Requesting now | AUTHORITY | 19/12/2022 |
| Nithya Priya K R vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | 1. Compensation(SBI MCLR 2%/month) to be paid from Aug 2021 before reg. 2. Builder should be prohibited from collecting maintenance before completing amenities 3. No further project extension by RERA | AUTHORITY | 19/12/2022 |
| Raja Ravi Kiran Yeluri vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | 1) Deny phase 1 extension approvals sought by RHL. 2) Compensation for the delay as per the agreement 3) Instruct RHL to update correct status in RERA website and to customers | AUTHORITY | 16/11/2022 |
| NITIN BANSAL vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Raja Housing Ltd should start paying me the compenstation starting from 1 Nov 2021 till the project completion date. Requesting RERA to not provide further extension to this project. | AUTHORITY | 15/09/2022 |
| Priyanshu Shrivastava vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | 1. Final Possession date 2. correct compensation as per agreement i.e monthly basis starting Nov 21 3. No further extension provided to the builder. 4. RERA website to be updated as per actuals | AUTHORITY | 14/12/2022 |
| SHURYA KUMAR vs M/S RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | The builder has to pay the delay compensation from January 2021 till OC is received. | AUTHORITY | 14/12/2022 |
| MANOJ KUMAR YADAV & TANNU SHREE vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Compensation for almost 1 Year delay from Builder and compel builder to follow Agreement and RERA guidelines before possession. Not give extension to RAJA RITZ Avenue phase 1. | AUTHORITY | 13/10/2022 |
| DEBASISH DWIBEDY & MRS. SASWATI DAS vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | 1. Raja housing Ltd should start paying me compensation starting from 1Nov2021 till the project completion date. 2. Requesting RERA to not provide further extension of completion date to this project | AUTHORITY | 11/10/2022 |
| ROHIT BADE vs RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1 | 1. Request RERA to not provide further extension to builder. 2. Request RERA to force the builder to provide a clear project completion date and start providing compensation delay to customers. | AUTHORITY | 10/10/2022 |
| Akshaya Jeevan Panigrahi vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | To order the Builder rectify the defect at its own cost as agreed on the Signed Sales Agreement/Sale deed or compensate the cost of Rs Two Lakh | AUTHORITY | 09/07/2025 |
| RAVI RANJAN KUMAR vs M/S. RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | please do not allow anymore extension and order them to pay monthly compensation for delays | AUTHORITY | 07/10/2022 |
| SHANKAR RAMAN IYER vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Firm Date on Handover in livable condition and compensation for delay | AUTHORITY | 07/02/2023 |
| KUMAR SAURABH & SANGEETA KUMAR SAURABH vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Expedition of possession and payment from builder for the entitled compensation. | AUTHORITY | 07/02/2023 |
| KISHOR KUMAR vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | 1. Raja Housing ltd should pay me the compensation for delay starting from 1 Nov 2021 till project completion. 2. Request to RERA : Donot provide further extension of completion date to this project. | AUTHORITY | 06/01/2023 |
| ARJUN RAMAKRISHNAN, DIVYA K, B RAMAKRISHNAN vs M/S. RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | 1. Timely payment of monthly compensation till the date of registration. 2. Handing over of apartment as per date promised. 3. Please do not approve further extension for this project/builder. | AUTHORITY | 05/12/2022 |
| Xavier Mascarenhas vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Return all the money paid along with applicable interest rate based interest payments and penalties back to me | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2023 |
| KUSHI DHANANJAYA vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Please do not provide any further extension to the builder under force majure as the builder has been constantly give false promises and unrealistic delivery dates | AUTHORITY | 04/08/2022 |
| MR NAGA SURYA NARAYANA MAROJU & ANOTHER vs M/S.RAJA HOUSING LIMITED AND ANOTHER | We request RERA to help and get the compensation paid on a monthly basis and a concrete date for possession with the Occupancy Certificate and with all the promised amenities . | AUTHORITY | 03/11/2023 |
| MAHESH HEBBALLI & RASHMI ANGADI vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Providing compensation from Raja Housing, for delayed Construction and handover of flat | AUTHORITY | 02/11/2022 |
| SOUMYA SINGARI & SAMBHU PRASAD BEJ vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Monthly Compensation from the RERA expiry date as per the agreement | AUTHORITY | 02/08/2022 |
| PRADEEP KUMAR YADAV vs RAJA HOUSING LIMITED | Builder should start paying me compensation from 1st Nov 2021 after RERA expiry date and no further extension should be provided to Builder | AUTHORITY | 01/08/2022 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (34 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/211111/0008542 11-11-2021 | Project delayed and interest not paid by builder | RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211210/0008709 10-12-2021 | Possession delayed and not paying compensation | RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220207/0008977 07-02-2022 | Project delayed, builder is not responding and not paying compensation for the delay posession | RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220209/0008994 09-02-2022 | Delay in Delivery of Flat and deliberate delay in completion of project | RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220215/0009005 15-02-2022 | Possession delayed, not paying compensation and no proper communication from builder | RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220215/0009006 15-02-2022 | My property is not handed over by RERA pocession date | RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220215/0009014 15-02-2022 | Possession delayed and not paying compensation | RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220218/0009024 18-02-2022 | Rera date expired, possession delayed and compensation not paid | RAJA RITZ AVENUE - PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Mr. JAGALUR.F.F - SPACEMAST | - | 1997 | Vyalikaval, GD Park Extention |
| Contractor | M/s UMIYA CONSTRUCTIONS | - | 2009 | Nobel Residency, Yelanahalli |
| Structural engineer | Mr. M THARANATH - RACHANA CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingRaja Housing has 7 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 52%). 4 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹32.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE – 560025 (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …2031). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 4 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 4 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 7 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 12 km |
| Electronic City | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 24 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.