Shriram Esquire
K-RERA · the public record
SHRIRAM SERENITY
Bengaluru North · SHRIRAM PROPERTIES
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
20%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
0units not bookedof 270 · Q1 2026 filing
05 Jul 2029declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
12%
Q3 2025
15%
Q4 2025
20%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
05 Jul 2029
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE8
13
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE1
12
APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE2
12
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE6
12
APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE10
12
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE10
12
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE13
12
APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE3
12
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE11
12
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE9
13
APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE7
12
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE5
12
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE3
13
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE7
12
APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE5
1
APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE9
12
APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE8
12
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE4
12
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE12
13
APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE1
13
APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE6
12
APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE4
12
APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE2
12
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
3.8registered acres
70.4registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for SHRIRAM SERENITY
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/170924/007026
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion5 July 2029
Land area15,530 sq m (3.8 acres)
Homes registered270
Tower/wing entries3
Unit mix13 × APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE8, 12 × APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE1, 12 × APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE2, 12 × APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE6, 12 × APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE10, 12 ×
In context
Density70.4 homes per acre
Density in context44th percentile of 529 Bengaluru North projects (median 75.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 270 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 22,586 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 46,985 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 15,530 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.24 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 270 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 269 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 54 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | DPA/TP/CC/278/2022-23 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 27-11-2023 | |
| Project start date | 05-07-2024 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE8 | 13 | 5% | 1,246 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE1 | 12 | 4% | 954 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE2 | 12 | 4% | 774 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE6 | 12 | 4% | 1,144 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE10 | 12 | 4% | 912 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE10 | 12 | 4% | 1,158 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE13 | 12 | 4% | 1,245 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE3 | 12 | 4% | 784 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE11 | 12 | 4% | 1,230 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE9 | 13 | 5% | 1,249 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE7 | 12 | 4% | 882 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE5 | 12 | 4% | 1,132 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE3 | 13 | 5% | 1,058 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE7 | 12 | 4% | 1,145 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE5 | 1 | 0% | 73 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE9 | 12 | 4% | 906 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE8 | 12 | 4% | 889 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE4 | 12 | 4% | 981 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE12 | 13 | 5% | 1,346 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE1 | 13 | 5% | 836 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE6 | 12 | 4% | 881 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 2BHK - TYPE4 | 12 | 4% | 787 sqm |
| APARTMENTS- 3BHK - TYPE2 | 12 | 4% | 975 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 11 | 96 | 96 | 36.3 m |
| B | 12 | 78 | 78 | 39.3 m |
| C | 12 | 96 | 96 | 39.3 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 270 official flat/unit rows, matching the 270 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK | 160 | 79.5-103.8 sqm | 40.6-55.5 sqm | 160 |
| 2 BHK | 110 | 64.3-76.0 sqm | 33.7-40.3 sqm | 110 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 96 | 65.3-102.5 sqm | 34.3-54.6 sqm | 96 |
| C | 96 | 64.5-103.8 sqm | 34.3-55.5 sqm | 96 |
| B | 78 | 64.3-103.5 sqm | 33.7-55.2 sqm | 78 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A.00.01 | A | 0 | 3 BHK | 81.3 sqm | 41.9 sqm | 1 |
| A.00.02 | A | 0 | 2 BHK | 74.0 sqm | 38.7 sqm | 1 |
| A.00.03 | A | 0 | 3 BHK | 95.4 sqm | 50.3 sqm | 1 |
| A.00.04 | A | 0 | 3 BHK | 102.5 sqm | 54.6 sqm | 1 |
| A.00.05 | A | 0 | 2 BHK | 65.3 sqm | 34.3 sqm | 1 |
| A.00.06 | A | 0 | 3 BHK | 81.7 sqm | 41.9 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
10 of 47 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 37 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA complaint orders (1 complaint against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUBHODEEP KUMAR DEY vs SHIRAM PROPERTIES LIMITED | Please help me in recovering my booking amount along with interest for mental harassment from Shriram builders | AUTHORITY | 14/03/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (88 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190214/0002107 14-02-2019 | Project delayed by 2 years and we end up paying huge amounts towards GST and additional interest, now builder is silent on compensation under RERA act even after promising over mail. | SHRIRAM SUMMITT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190217/0002173 17-02-2019 | DELAY COMPENSATION | SHRIRAM SUMMITT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190223/0002264 23-02-2019 | Project delay compensation | SHRIRAM SUMMITT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190303/0002293 03-03-2019 | Project Delay compensation | SHRIRAM SUMMITT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190311/0002339 11-03-2019 | Request for delay compensation as per RERA guidelines because of inordinate delay by the builder in handing over the flat # 05.08.04 in shriram summitt. | SHRIRAM SUMMITT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190314/0002393 14-03-2019 | Shriram Summitt - Seeking Compensation for Delay in Handing over the Flat (16-07-03) | SHRIRAM SUMMITT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190414/0002594 14-04-2019 | Delay Compensation post delivery date expiry till I get the OC for flat 05-06-02 | SHRIRAM SUMMITT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190426/0002783 26-04-2019 | Request for compensation on account of delayed possession by builder | SHRIRAM SUMMITT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing7 of 7 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
3 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 12-11-2021 | Annexure 94 NOC Water Supply Rajankunte Gram Panch (1).pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 24-03-2023 | Annexure 99 NOC KSPCB CFE dated 23 March 23 and 24 (1).pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 29-03-2023 | Annexure 100 NOC SEIAA dated 28 March 23 Adde Vi (1).pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 17-11-2022 | Annexure 93 BESCOM NOC 17112022 (1).pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 20-10-2023 | Annexure 97 Fire NOC Adde 20102023 (1).pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 10-10-2002 | Annexure 98 NOC Airport Authority of India dated 1 (1).pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 14-11-2022 | Annexure 101 BSNL NOC Dated 141122 (1).pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | Vivek Gupta | 506887 | 2010 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560067 |
| Engineer | Sundaram Rajagopala Iyyar | BCC/BL-3.6/A-2698/2015-16 | 1998 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001 |
| Architect | R. Sundaram | CA-75-1404 | 1998 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001 |
| Contractor | Shriram Properties Limited | - | 1997 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560080 |
Builder track record
RERA filingShriram Properties has 7 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Shriram Properties”) (average reported construction progress 60%). 3 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹8.16 Cr collected from buyers, ₹13.72 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹13.72 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹8.16 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 12% → 20% (+8 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 270/270 (100%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹43.41 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹30.81 Cr (0.71x collections) |
- 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
- Construction progress moved from 12% to 20% across the filed QPR window.
- The builder has drawn 0.71x of buyer collections from escrow (about 71% of the ₹43 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
- In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹33.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: State Bank of Mauritius Ltd.. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 17 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 17 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 23 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 31 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 32 km |
| Electronic City | 39 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.