Sobha Dream Acres - Tropical Greens Phase 22 Wing 23 and 24

Project facts and comparisons

Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.

Project areas, parking and inventory

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 237 official flat/unit rows, matching the 237 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

⚠ 12 litigation cases on record

• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Smt.Ramakka against Sri. Akrishnappa and others — II Addl. (Sr.Dn.), Bangalore Rural (2016)
• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Smt. Rajamma against B.C. Narayana Reddy and others (M/s.Sobha Limited is not a party and no adverse Order/s on land / project is passed by the Court;) — Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Banglaore Rural (2010)
• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Smt.Y.Achhamma against Y.Venkata Reddy and others (M/s.Sobha Limited is not a party and no adverse Order/s on land / project is passed by the Court;) — Principal (Sr.Dn.) Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural (2011)
• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Smt. Rathnamma & Others Vs. Sri. Muniraju and Others (M/s.Sobha Limited is not a party and no adverse Order/s on land / project is passed by the Court;) — III Additional Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural Dist (2014)
• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Muniyappa Vs Smt. Shaifunissa and Others (M/s.Sobha Limited is not a party and no adverse Order/s on land / project is passed by the Court;) — 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural Dist (2009)
• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Anand Kumar and Anr Vs. Gauramma and Ors (M/s.Sobha Limited is not a party and no adverse Order/s on land / project is passed by the Court;) — I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural, Bengaluru (2017)
• Writ Petition — High Court of Karnataka (2015)
• W.P filed by Sobha Limited against BBMP and Others, before the High Court of Karnataka, challenging the Ground Rent charges claimed by BBMP — High Court of Karnataka (2019)
• Writ petition filed by Sobha Limited against BBMP and Others, challenging the Ground Rent charges claimed by BBMP — High court of Karnataka (2020)
• Writ petition filed by Sobha Limited against BBMP and Others, before the High Court of Karnataka, challenging the Ground Rent,GSt and others charges claimed by BBMP — High court of Karnataka (2020)
• OS 368/2020 filed by Manohar Babu and another against Rukkamma and others before IV Addl Senior Civil Judge at Bangalore Rural for partition, separate possession and other reliefs — IV Additional Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural Dist (2020)
• OS 483/2022 filed by Kaveramma against Muniyappa and others before III Addl Senior Civil Judge at Bangalore Rural for partition, separate possession and other reliefs — III Additional Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural Dist (2022)

11 of 36 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 25 slots have usable uploaded filings.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Jun 2025, extended (Covid Extension) to 30 Mar 2026 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.

See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →

3 of 4 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Other recorded statuses: KPTCL- BESCOM: Applied. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.

6 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.

K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

Sobha has 121 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Sobha”) (average reported construction progress 60%). 60 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.

Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.

Financials & Construction Progress

Latest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹5.71 Cr collected from buyers, ₹5.70 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.

• 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
• Construction progress moved from 96% to 100% across the filed QPR window.
• The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.

QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹39.2 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.

RERA 70% project account is on file: RATNAKAR BANK Residency Road (IFSC RATN0000156, a/c …9689). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload across Wing 23.

These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.

Location & Connectivity

The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 4 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.

Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.