Gandhinagar500
K-RERA · the public record
VSPL Pinnacle
Bengaluru North · Vikram Structures
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a unit? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your unit, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗31 Dec 2018declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
12registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Commercial Space
11
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
1.0registered acres
12.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for VSPL Pinnacle
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/171102/001908
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2018
Land area3,874 sq m (1.0 acres)
Units registered12
Tower/wing entries1
Unit mix11 × Commercial Space
In context
Density12.5 units per acre
Density in context8th percentile of 529 Bengaluru North projects (median 75.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 12 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 3,696 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 3,874 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~3.61 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈13,992 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 3,874 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 214 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 22 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-01-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Space | 11 | 100% | 3,696 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VSPL PINNACLE | 11 | 12 | 214 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 12 official flat/unit rows, matching the 12 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMMERCIAL | 12 | 736.8-1,035.1 sqft | 254.5-357.5 sqft | 214 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VSPL PINNACLE | 12 | 736.8-1,035.1 sqft | 254.5-357.5 sqft | 214 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 0 | COMMERCIAL | 779.5 sqft | 269.2 sqft | 18 |
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 1 | COMMERCIAL | 736.8 sqft | 254.5 sqft | 18 |
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 2 | COMMERCIAL | 1,035.1 sqft | 357.5 sqft | 18 |
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 3 | COMMERCIAL | 1,035.1 sqft | 357.5 sqft | 18 |
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 4 | COMMERCIAL | 1,035.1 sqft | 357.5 sqft | 18 |
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 5 | COMMERCIAL | 1,035.1 sqft | 357.5 sqft | 18 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 19 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 Dec 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 17 Jan 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/200117/001908) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (37 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kakumani Manjula vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of total amount should be paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 31/03/2026 |
| Kakumani Sreevani vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of total amount should be paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 31/03/2026 |
| Viswanadham Madhutej vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of the total amount should be paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 31/03/2026 |
| Mullangi Geetha Vani vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of total amount should be paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| MANISH KAPOOR vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of full consideration paid with compensation from Respondents | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| Arthi Ravi vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Penalty to promoter, Possession of unit sold in sale deed along with delay interest till handing over the possession. | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| Meghana T V vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Possession of unit sold in fifth floor measuring 1000 Sq ft with delay interest | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| Hannah Althia Hector vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Possession of the unit sold in registered sale deed along with delay interest till possession of unit | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| Harshan Goodwin Hector vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | seeking Possession of the unit sold in registered sale deed along with delay interest till possession of unit | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| VALLAMKONDU VAISHNAVI vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Return of Money with Intrest and Penalty | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| VALLAMKONDU GANESH KUMAR vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of total amount paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| KOPPARAPU VENKATA NARASIMHA RAO vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of total amount with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| KOPPARAPU MADHAVI vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | refund of total amount with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| NAMA HIMA BINDU vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of total amount with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| RAMYA PRIYA NAMA vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refud of total amount with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| VARADARAJ K R vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Help in settling the amount paid with due interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| CHINTHA SWETHA vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT LTD. | Compensation of Total Amount with Interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| SANTHOSH KUMAR PARRIPATI vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of Total amount paid with Interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| C VARALAKSHMI vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT LTD. | Refund of total amount paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| SARITHA MUNAGA vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | REFUND OF AMOUNT PAID WITH INTEREST | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| LAKSHMI NARASIMH GUPTA REPAKULA vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | REFUND OF AMOUNT PAID WITH INTEREST | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| PUNYAVATHI MATAM vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of Total amount paid with Interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| MUNAGA NARASIMHULU vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | REFUND OF AMOUNT PAID WITH INTEREST | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| V SIVA MANJUNATH vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of total amount paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| MALEPATI KAUSHIK vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT LTD. | Refund of Total amount paid with Interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| NITIN R PATIL AND PREETI ITNAL vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of Total amount paid with Interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| Sunil Kumar M vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund total amount invested along with interest | AUTHORITY | 21/04/2025 |
| Malepati Subramanyam vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of total amount should be paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 17/09/2025 |
| Malepati sailaja vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of total amount should be paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 17/09/2025 |
| Veena katakam vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of Total Amount paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 17/09/2025 |
| Chandrakanth G Yatnatti vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | We want our 10000 SFT of commercial space back, rent amount as per the rental lease agreement with interest and Occupancy Certificate/Katha. | AUTHORITY | 14/02/2024 |
| Ravishankar G Yatnatti vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | We want our 3000 SFT of commercial space back, rent amount with interest and Occupancy Certificate/Kath | AUTHORITY | 14/02/2024 |
| NUNE PRASAD BABU vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Return total paid amount along with interest and panility | AUTHORITY | 12/08/2025 |
| Ambale Subbrao Gopinath vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | RERA is requested to intervene and get the Consideration amount along with Interest amount refunded from the Builder. | AUTHORITY | 12/08/2025 |
| Sunita Nanjangud Gopalkrishna vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of the consideration amount of 53,00,000/- along with Interest as per the agreement to sell. | AUTHORITY | 12/08/2025 |
| M N Vijai vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Delivery of Unit sold and impose penalty to the promoters for violation of RERA compliance | AUTHORITY | 09/01/2026 |
| Gattu Venkata Vamsi Krishna AND Mylapalli Keerthi vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of Total amount paid with Interest | AUTHORITY | 08/04/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (29 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210425/0007927 25-04-2021 | Builder oversold than his share of builtup area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210608/0007983 08-06-2021 | Builder oversold than his share of buildup area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210818/0008255 18-08-2021 | Builder Oversold beyond his share of builtup area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210819/0008257 19-08-2021 | Builder oversold than his share of built-up area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210918/0008351 18-09-2021 | Promoter has not been handed over the position till today. | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210920/0008354 20-09-2021 | Promoter has not been handed over the position till today | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220124/0008857 24-01-2022 | Builder Oversold than his share of builtup area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220124/0008861 24-01-2022 | Builder oversold than his share builtup area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Architect INC | - | 1991 | RT Nagar Main Road, Bangalore |
| Structural engineer | Kinetics Solution Pvt Ltd | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹366.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: UNITED BANK OF INDIA Mid-corporate Branch, White field (IFSC UBIN0573434, a/c …0008). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 3 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 3 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 9 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 17 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 20 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 20 km |
| Electronic City | 25 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.