Gandhinagar500
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Vikram Structures · Bengaluru North · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/171102/001908
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 4 approved drawings and 19 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Gurugram colony’s approved papers: 392.997 sq m already used of the 396 allowed — the promised extra room can never be built.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →VSPL Pinnacle occupies 1.0 acres with 12 commercial spaces and an estimated project cost of ₹44.0 crore. At 12.5 units per acre it sits at the 8th percentile of 521 Bengaluru North projects on this register (median 75.3). Its declared completion date of 31 December 2018 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Vspl Pinnacle is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/171102/001908, and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Dec 2018.
31 Dec 2018
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Vspl Pinnacle spans 3,874 sq m (0.96 acres), comprises 1 tower, registers 12 units, and is declared to cost ₹44.03 cr.
₹44.03 cr
declared project cost
0.96acres
3,874 sq m
12units
on the registration
13992.0FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the unit to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 12 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 3,696 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 3,874 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~3.61 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈13,992 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 3,874 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered towers/wings | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 214 total (22 open) — 17.83 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 01-01-2015 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial Space | 11 | 100% | 3,696 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VSPL PINNACLE | 11 | 12 | 214 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 12 official flat/unit rows, matching the 12 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMMERCIAL | 12 | 736.8-1,035.1 sqft | 254.5-357.5 sqft | 214 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VSPL PINNACLE | 12 | 736.8-1,035.1 sqft | 254.5-357.5 sqft | 214 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 0 | COMMERCIAL | 779.5 sqft | 269.2 sqft | 18 |
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 1 | COMMERCIAL | 736.8 sqft | 254.5 sqft | 18 |
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 2 | COMMERCIAL | 1,035.1 sqft | 357.5 sqft | 18 |
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 3 | COMMERCIAL | 1,035.1 sqft | 357.5 sqft | 18 |
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 4 | COMMERCIAL | 1,035.1 sqft | 357.5 sqft | 18 |
| 1 | VSPL PINNACLE | 5 | COMMERCIAL | 1,035.1 sqft | 357.5 sqft | 18 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which unit to ask for · Drawings Report
The unit-level read: which ones to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put around each, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 19 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 Dec 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 17 Jan 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/200117/001908) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (37 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kakumani Manjula vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of total amount should be paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 31/03/2026 |
| Kakumani Sreevani vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of total amount should be paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 31/03/2026 |
| Viswanadham Madhutej vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of the total amount should be paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 31/03/2026 |
| Mullangi Geetha Vani vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of total amount should be paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| MANISH KAPOOR vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of full consideration paid with compensation from Respondents | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| Arthi Ravi vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Penalty to promoter, Possession of unit sold in sale deed along with delay interest till handing over the possession. | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| Meghana T V vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Possession of unit sold in fifth floor measuring 1000 Sq ft with delay interest | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| Hannah Althia Hector vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Possession of the unit sold in registered sale deed along with delay interest till possession of unit | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| Harshan Goodwin Hector vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | seeking Possession of the unit sold in registered sale deed along with delay interest till possession of unit | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| VALLAMKONDU VAISHNAVI vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Return of Money with Intrest and Penalty | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| VALLAMKONDU GANESH KUMAR vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of total amount paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| KOPPARAPU VENKATA NARASIMHA RAO vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of total amount with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| KOPPARAPU MADHAVI vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | refund of total amount with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| NAMA HIMA BINDU vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of total amount with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| RAMYA PRIYA NAMA vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refud of total amount with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| VARADARAJ K R vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Help in settling the amount paid with due interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| CHINTHA SWETHA vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT LTD. | Compensation of Total Amount with Interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| SANTHOSH KUMAR PARRIPATI vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of Total amount paid with Interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| C VARALAKSHMI vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT LTD. | Refund of total amount paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| SARITHA MUNAGA vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | REFUND OF AMOUNT PAID WITH INTEREST | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| LAKSHMI NARASIMH GUPTA REPAKULA vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | REFUND OF AMOUNT PAID WITH INTEREST | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| PUNYAVATHI MATAM vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of Total amount paid with Interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| MUNAGA NARASIMHULU vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | REFUND OF AMOUNT PAID WITH INTEREST | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| V SIVA MANJUNATH vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of total amount paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| MALEPATI KAUSHIK vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT LTD. | Refund of Total amount paid with Interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| NITIN R PATIL AND PREETI ITNAL vs VIKRAM STRUCTURES PVT. LTD., | Refund of Total amount paid with Interest | AUTHORITY | 28/12/2023 |
| Sunil Kumar M vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund total amount invested along with interest | AUTHORITY | 21/04/2025 |
| Malepati Subramanyam vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of total amount should be paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 17/09/2025 |
| Malepati sailaja vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of total amount should be paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 17/09/2025 |
| Veena katakam vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of Total Amount paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 17/09/2025 |
| Chandrakanth G Yatnatti vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | We want our 10000 SFT of commercial space back, rent amount as per the rental lease agreement with interest and Occupancy Certificate/Katha. | AUTHORITY | 14/02/2024 |
| Ravishankar G Yatnatti vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | We want our 3000 SFT of commercial space back, rent amount with interest and Occupancy Certificate/Kath | AUTHORITY | 14/02/2024 |
| NUNE PRASAD BABU vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Return total paid amount along with interest and panility | AUTHORITY | 12/08/2025 |
| Ambale Subbrao Gopinath vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | RERA is requested to intervene and get the Consideration amount along with Interest amount refunded from the Builder. | AUTHORITY | 12/08/2025 |
| Sunita Nanjangud Gopalkrishna vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of the consideration amount of 53,00,000/- along with Interest as per the agreement to sell. | AUTHORITY | 12/08/2025 |
| M N Vijai vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Delivery of Unit sold and impose penalty to the promoters for violation of RERA compliance | AUTHORITY | 09/01/2026 |
| Gattu Venkata Vamsi Krishna AND Mylapalli Keerthi vs Vikram Structures Pvt Ltd | Refund of Total amount paid with Interest | AUTHORITY | 08/04/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (29 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210425/0007927 25-04-2021 | Builder oversold than his share of builtup area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210608/0007983 08-06-2021 | Builder oversold than his share of buildup area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210818/0008255 18-08-2021 | Builder Oversold beyond his share of builtup area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210819/0008257 19-08-2021 | Builder oversold than his share of built-up area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210918/0008351 18-09-2021 | Promoter has not been handed over the position till today. | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210920/0008354 20-09-2021 | Promoter has not been handed over the position till today | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220124/0008857 24-01-2022 | Builder Oversold than his share of builtup area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220124/0008861 24-01-2022 | Builder oversold than his share builtup area | VSPL Pinnacle | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Architect INC | - | 1991 | RT Nagar Main Road, Bangalore |
| Structural engineer | Kinetics Solution Pvt Ltd | - | - | - |
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹366.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: UNITED BANK OF INDIA Mid-corporate Branch, White field (IFSC UBIN0573434, a/c …0008). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
The nearest major job hub is ~3 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 3 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 9 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 17 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 20 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 20 km |
| Electronic City | 25 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 4 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get VSPL Pinnacle approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For VSPL Pinnacle, one reading of it goes further. Which unit should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the units, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which unit to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Vikram Structures.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Vspl Pinnacle?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026