Matoshri Heights
MahaRERA · the public record
Suraksha Smart City - Phase I
RAJAVALI VILLAGE · Conceptual Advisory Services LLP
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a unit? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your unit, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
1,543units filed as unsoldInventory · 23 October 2026
31 Dec 2026declared completionMahaRERA registration · read 19 Jul 2026
7,552registered unitsMahaRERA registration · read 19 Jul 2026
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗Free project details
Registration read 19 Jul 2026RERA details for Suraksha Smart City - Phase I
MahaRERA · P99000023396
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
Suraksha Smart City - Phase I is registered with MahaRERA as P99000023396 and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Dec 2026.
31 Dec 2026
declared completion
2months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 19 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | P99000023396 |
| Registered on | 12 Dec 2019 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 31 Dec 2026 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 2 months to the declared date |
Approvals and compliance
What compliance filings are on record?
MahaRERA's defaulter and deregistration lists and the quarterly-progress filing for Suraksha Smart City - Phase I record 1 quarterly progress report since registration.
1quarterly filing
Entries as they appear on MahaRERA's own lists and the project's progress filing.
Source · MahaRERA defaulter, deregistration and QPR lists · read 19 Jul 2026
- Filing progress reports — 1 quarterly progress report on record since registration, with no current default.
Promoter record
What else is this promoter on record for?
Conceptual Advisory Services LLP is the promoter of record on 3 projects registered with MahaRERA.
3projects
registered with MahaRERA
Counted across Quietlist's full MahaRERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · MahaRERA register, all projects · read 19 Jul 2026
Construction
How much construction cost has been reported?
In Suraksha Smart City - Phase I, ₹967.00 Cr of a declared ₹1241.85 Cr estimated project cost is reported as incurred, about 77.9%, as at the last certified filing with MahaRERA.
77.9%
₹967.00 Cr
of ₹1241.85 Cr declared cost
Cost incurred as last certified to MahaRERA. It is a financial measure, not a survey of site work, and it can lag on-site reality between filings.
Source · MahaRERA quarterly progress filing · read 19 Jul 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In Suraksha Smart City - Phase I, 6,009 of 7,552 units filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked (5,614 with registered agreements and 395 booked), about 80%, and 1,543 are filed as unsold.
80%sold or booked
6,009 of 7,552 units
₹1382.14 Cr
committed by buyers
Counts and agreement value as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability. Of that agreement value, ₹923.81 Cr (about 67%) is recorded as collected and ₹458.33 Cr as receivable.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 19 Jul 2026
Filed agreement values: across 6009 sold or booked entries with usable filed values and areas, the effective carpet rate is ₹7,930/sqft, with eight in ten falling between ₹7,909 and ₹9,030 — computed from the agreement values and carpet areas the promoter filed, not broker quotes.
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
What the filings record, unit by unit
Read from MahaRERA on 23 October 2026
MahaRERA publishes, unit by unit, what this promoter filed: which units are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for sold or booked entries the filed agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific unit. On this project 6009 units carry one, and 1543 of the 7552 are recorded unsold.
Here is one unit filed as unsold, beside the amounts filed for comparable units:
| Unit | Carpet | Filed comparison | Based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building No 10-1001 | 284 sqft | Rs 22.50 lakh typical, over Rs 22.50 lakh to Rs 37.69 lakh 4 unusually low or high filed amounts are included in this range. Check the individual entries before using it to discuss a price. | 6009 filed · similar area (within 2%), elsewhere in project |
A filed consideration is the amount the promoter reported for one unit. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the unit is available to you today. Only one observation of this ledger so far: no change can be reported yet. This observation is an archived copy whose time is the moment the file was written, not a portal fetch time.
In Suraksha Smart City - Phase I, 1415 of the 1543 unsold units have filed sales to compare with. The Sales Report gives each of them its own row — the filed agreements behind its comparison listed in full, the government reckoner value the promoter filed against it, and mortgage status where the filing supplies it. Missing mortgage information is not confirmation that a unit is free of a mortgage. Built from the filing itself, sent by email.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+24 and 7552 units are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building No 17 | 1 | G+24 | 936 | - |
| Building No 18 | 1 | G+24 | 657 | - |
| Building No 19 | 1 | G+24 | 826 | - |
| Building No 20 | 1 | G+24 | 917 | - |
| Building No 8 | 1 | G+24 | 650 | - |
| Building No 9 | 1 | G+24 | 812 | - |
| Building No 10 | 1 | G+24 | 632 | - |
| Building No 14 | 1 | G+24 | 657 | - |
| Building No 15 | 1 | G+24 | 826 | - |
| Building No 16 | 1 | G+24 | 639 | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 7423 residential and 129 non-residential.
Legal and disputes
What disputes are disclosed?
24 complaints are on the MahaRERA record for Suraksha Smart City - Phase I, with orders passed in 11 of them.
24complaints
11with an order
Counts as disclosed in the project record.
Source · MahaRERA project disclosures · read 19 Jul 2026
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC12501174 | 08/04/2025 | ANAND JOSEPH ALMEIDA vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12600846 | 15/02/2026 | Pankaj Pandurang Ghole vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12502442 | 17/07/2025 | ROHIT RAMESH DESAI vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12502647 | 31/07/2025 | CHANDAN ROY vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12504513 | 17/12/2025 | VIVEKKUMAR VINODKUMAR GUPTA vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12503284 | 14/09/2025 | Rajesh Chhotelal Gupta vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12601998 | 04/04/2026 | Vaibhav Jaywant Lad vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12504124 | 22/11/2025 | Roshan Uraban Dsilva vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12504295 | 05/12/2025 | ZAKIR KADAR BASHA vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12600441 | 24/01/2026 | vinod Patwa vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12602935 | 19/05/2026 | Sandesh Kishor Titwalkar vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12602096 | 09/04/2026 | Bhushan Kashiram Dhuri vs Suraksha Realty Limited (Promoter of Suraksha Smart City Project) | pending / no order on file |
| CC12601711 | 25/03/2026 | Anushka Akash Acharekar vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12602106 | 10/04/2026 | Suresh Arjun Konar vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | order passed |
| CC12602489 | 28/04/2026 | Farhan Mohd Nasim Khan vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12602169 | 13/04/2026 | srikanth Gidla vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12602715 | 10/05/2026 | Aman Arun Nikam vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12602950 | 19/05/2026 | PRANAY SANTOSH PAWAR vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12603343 | 01/06/2026 | ASHFAQ AHMED SHAIKH vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12603199 | 28/05/2026 | Amit Prajapati vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12603701 | 15/06/2026 | Bhavika Jethalal Thakkar vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12603900 | 24/06/2026 | Jigar Paresh Mistry vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12603798 | 19/06/2026 | Rundhadevi VinodKumar Vishwakarma vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
| CC12604353 | 12/07/2026 | Devendra Mani Tiwari vs Conceptual Advisory Services LLP | pending / no order on file |
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 3 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 3 “Ongoing”. These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your unit. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vasai Court | 106 | 2021 | Ongoing Filed description: Background of the Case: The matter involves a dispute over property rights, focusing on the legal validity of documents such as an Agreement for Sale (AFS) and a Power of Attorney (POA). The documents were executed between: 1. Tenant (Shashikant Patil & Others) and Parag Ladhani. 2. Parag Ladhani and Conceptual Advisory LLP (promoters). Issues raised: 1. Challenge to Legal Tenancy: The owners have denied the legal tenancy rights of Shashikant Patil and others, questioning their status as tenants. The owners have consequently challenged the validity of the AFS and POA based on this denial. Pending Adjudication: The Senior Division Civil Court is yet to pass any order in the matter, and all issues remain under consideration. Defendant has filed Application for Stay and Application Under Order 7 Rule 11, CPC Both applications (stay of proceedings and rejection of plaint) are pending before the court for orders. |
| Revenue Court | TNC/39 | 2018 | Ongoing Filed description: Status: evidence partly heard. next date 03.06.25 The case revolves around a dispute or issue brought before the Tahsildar, Vasai, identified under "Ku.Ka.Kalam.32g, Dasa family land owners and sashikant patil tenant (kull). Both parties presented their claims, and supporting documents or evidence were submitted for consideration. Specific claims, counter claims, or grievances from each party were recorded. View Taken by the Tahsildar, Vasai. After hearing detailed arguments and examining the evidence presented by both parties, the Tahsildar analyzed the matter within the framework of applicable laws and regulations. Equal opportunity was provided to both parties to clarify their positions and present supporting materials. The decision was made based on existing legal provisions, administrative records, and precedents relevant to the cases. The Tahsildar provided a clear directive or ruling to address the dispute. he passed the order in favour of tenant sashikant patil and others. |
| Bombay High Court | 9432 | 2024 | Ongoing Filed description: Matter is filed to revoke permission granted by Corporation. the matter is pending and next date in the matter is not yet listed on high court board. |
Deadline Extensions
The MahaRERA completion deadline for this project has been formally extended 1 time, as recorded on the register.
| From | Extended to | Stated reason |
|---|---|---|
| as registered | 31 Dec 2026 | 1. WE WERE PLANNING TO AMEND OUR PROJECT PLANS DUE TO WHICH OUR PROJECT EXECUTION PLANNING GOT DELAYED.; 2. WE HAVE NOT SOLD UNITS IN 4 BUILDINGS, THEREFORE WE COULD NOT COMPLETE T |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at RAJAVALI VILLAGE, RAJAVALI VILLAGE, Vasai, Palghar, 401208. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by 20 METER WIDE PROPOSED DP ROAD, to the south by PROPOSED GARDEN RESERVATION, to the east by 20 METER WIDE PROPOSED DP ROAD and to the west by 20 METER WIDE PROPOSED DP ROAD. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 29 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 29 km |
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 30 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 33 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 36 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 43 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 51 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.