Binary Essentia
K-RERA · the public record
BINARY TEMPLE TREE
Anekal · BINARY REALTY
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
96%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
13units not bookedof 149 · Q1 2026 filing
31 Dec 2028declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
95%
Q3 2025
92%
Q4 2025
96%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
31 Dec 2028
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
3 BHK
131
2 BHK
18
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.5registered acres
60.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for BINARY TEMPLE TREE
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/220124/006570
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2028
Land area10,015 sq m (2.5 acres)
Homes registered149
Tower/wing entries1
Unit mix131 × 3 BHK, 18 × 2 BHK
In context
Density60.2 homes per acre
Density in context29th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 149 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 14,661 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 27,758 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 10,015 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 164 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 164 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | APA-CC-925/2023-24 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 03-01-2024 | |
| Project start date | 01-03-2024 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK | 131 | 88% | 13,393 sqm |
| 2 BHK | 18 | 12% | 1,268 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binary Temple Tree | 8 | 149 | 164 | 27 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 149 official flat/unit rows, matching the 149 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK | 131 | 100.8-104.2 sqm | 56.3-60.2 sqm | 131 |
| 2 BHK | 18 | 65.7-75.2 sqm | 39.5-43.8 sqm | 18 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binary Temple Tree | 149 | 65.7-104.2 sqm | 39.5-60.2 sqm | 149 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G01 | Binary Temple Tree | 0 | 3 BHK | 100.9 sqm | 56.3 sqm | 1 |
| G02 | Binary Temple Tree | 0 | 3 BHK | 100.9 sqm | 56.3 sqm | 1 |
| G03 | Binary Temple Tree | 0 | 3 BHK | 100.9 sqm | 56.3 sqm | 1 |
| G04 | Binary Temple Tree | 0 | 3 BHK | 100.9 sqm | 56.3 sqm | 1 |
| G05 | Binary Temple Tree | 0 | 3 BHK | 100.9 sqm | 56.3 sqm | 1 |
| G06 | Binary Temple Tree | 0 | 3 BHK | 100.9 sqm | 56.3 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
⚠ 6 of 33 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Board Resolution for Authorized Signatory/Certificate of Authorization, Urban Land Ceiling, Collaboration Agreement/Development Agreement/Joint Development Agreement/Other Agreement, District Magistrate, Conversion Certificate under section 95 of the KLR Act 1964 and more.
1 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
Statutory approval status
RERA filing10 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | Sapthagiri BA | 239974 | 2011 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560004 |
| Engineer | PRASAD SHETTY | BCCL/BL-3.6/SE-0170/23-24 | 2014 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560043 |
| Architect | Dinesh kumar S | CA/2005/36381 | 2019 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560076 |
| Contractor | Dhiran | - | 2015 | Ranchi, Jharkhand - 829121 |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹155.50 Cr collected from buyers, ₹4.48 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 95% → 96% (+1 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 136/149 (91%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹318.21 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹164.67 Cr (0.52x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 95% to 96% across the filed QPR window.
- The builder has drawn 0.52x of buyer collections from escrow (about 52% of the ₹318 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹38.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: FEDERAL BANK OF INDIA Billapura IFSC Code : FDRL0002166 Pin Code : 562165. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 12 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 12 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 12 km |
| Electronic City | 12 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 22 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 26 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 38 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.