K-RERA · the public record
SHRIRAM CHIRPING GROVE - 2
Anekal · TANMATHRA AQUARELLE DEVELOPERS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a villa? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your villa, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best villas.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project · Sterling Villa Grande — Phase II · earlier comprehensive example
Two curved rows. Different lake-side choices.
A radial fronts the oval across the loop road; B radial faces the outer drive. The report compares all six villa types, from pool-equipped A to three-bedroom B and smaller C, with all 74 registered villa numbers. The March 2026 completion application’s three unsold homes are not identified; these are not live availability recommendations.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Sterling Villa Grande — Phase II sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
10 Jul 2026
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
13.1registered acres
8.3registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for SHRIRAM CHIRPING GROVE - 2
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/210902/004291
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 109 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 185 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 53,216 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 0.87 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 6 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 109 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 109 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 15-07-2021 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential - Wing - K - Type 8 | 12 | 100% | 185 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing-F | 2 | 14 | 14 | - |
| Wing-G | 2 | 14 | 14 | - |
| Wing-H | 2 | 30 | 30 | - |
| Wing-I | 2 | 12 | 12 | - |
| Wing-J | 2 | 12 | 12 | - |
| Wing-K | 2 | 27 | 27 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 109 official flat/unit rows, matching the 109 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Row House | 109 | 127.7-184.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 109 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing-H | 30 | 127.7-176.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 30 |
| Wing-K | 27 | 146.2-184.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 27 |
| Wing-F | 14 | 127.7-159.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 14 |
| Wing-G | 14 | 127.7-159.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 14 |
| Wing-I | 12 | 127.7-178.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 12 |
| Wing-J | 12 | 127.7-179.4 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 12 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 116 | Wing-F | 0 | Row House | 158.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 117 | Wing-F | 0 | Row House | 158.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 118 | Wing-F | 0 | Row House | 158.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 119 | Wing-F | 0 | Row House | 158.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 120 | Wing-F | 0 | Row House | 158.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 121 | Wing-F | 0 | Row House | 158.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 23 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 10 Jul 2026 — which has passed with no OC on file.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA complaint orders (2 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pankaj Kukkar vs TANMATHRA AQUARELLE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of booking amount as cancelled at a very early stage | AUTHORITY | 22/12/2022 |
| Prasenjit Das vs TANMATHRA AQUARELLE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Developer to refund the token amount of Rs. 50,000 | AUTHORITY | 15/11/2022 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/220304/0009075 04-03-2022 | Refund of Token amount of Rs. 50,000 | SHRIRAM CHIRPING GROVE - 2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220913/0010007 13-09-2022 | Refund for the booking cancelled with in 12 days | SHRIRAM CHIRPING GROVE - 2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing4 of 4 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
6 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 02-07-2018 | Water Supply NOC Panchayath (2).pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 23-08-2019 | 038 KSPCB (2).pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 23-09-2019 | 039 MOEF (1).pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 21-01-2020 | 036 BESCOM.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Satyanarayana.B | - | 1997 | R.T.Nagar, Bangalore-560032 |
| Structural engineer | Bhaskar.Y | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹17.45 Cr collected from buyers, ₹12.21 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 69% → 100% (+31 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 109/109 (100%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹34.77 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹24.49 Cr (0.70x collections) |
- 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
- Construction progress moved from 69% to 100% across the filed QPR window.
- The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.
- The builder has drawn 0.70x of buyer collections from escrow (about 70% of the ₹35 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹81.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC dommasandra (IFSC HDFC0004843, a/c …3419). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 14 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 14 km |
| Electronic City | 15 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 15 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 25 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 29 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 40 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.