Asset Arcadia
K-RERA · the public record
CoEvolve Florenza
Anekal · CoEvolve Estates
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
89%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
204units not bookedof 381 · Q1 2026 filing
31 Dec 2027declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
87%
Q3 2025
88%
Q4 2025
89%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
31 Dec 2027
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
2 BHK
106
3 BHK
275
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
4.0registered acres
95.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for CoEvolve Florenza
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/171023/006333
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2027
Land area16,196 sq m (4.0 acres)
Homes registered381
Tower/wing entries4
Unit mix106 × 2 BHK, 275 × 3 BHK
In context
Density95.2 homes per acre
Density in context75th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 381 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 33,899 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 59,879 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 16,196 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~2.64 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈42,701 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 16,196 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 667 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 381 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 38 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | APA/CC/856/2022-23 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 14-06-2023 | |
| Project start date | 01-06-2023 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 106 | 28% | 7,467 sqm |
| 3 BHK | 275 | 72% | 26,432 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 12 | 95 | 381 | 45 m |
| B | 12 | 96 | 96 | 45 m |
| C | 12 | 95 | 95 | 45 m |
| D | 12 | 95 | 95 | 45 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 381 official flat/unit rows, matching the 381 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK | 275 | 88.5-104.7 sqm | 38.8-47.0 sqm | 275 |
| 2 BHK | 106 | 65.9-74.1 sqm | 29.7-32.8 sqm | 106 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 96 | 67.6-104.7 sqm | 30.4-46.9 sqm | 96 |
| A | 95 | 72.0-101.0 sqm | 32.1-46.3 sqm | 95 |
| C | 95 | 65.9-104.7 sqm | 29.7-47.0 sqm | 95 |
| D | 95 | 67.4-101.5 sqm | 30.4-45.5 sqm | 95 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A101 | A | 1 | 3 BHK | 101.0 sqm | 46.3 sqm | 1 |
| A102 | A | 1 | 3 BHK | 92.2 sqm | 40.2 sqm | 1 |
| A103 | A | 1 | 3 BHK | 99.0 sqm | 43.0 sqm | 1 |
| A104 | A | 1 | 3 BHK | 95.8 sqm | 44.4 sqm | 1 |
| A105 | A | 1 | 2 BHK | 74.1 sqm | 32.7 sqm | 1 |
| A106 | A | 1 | 3 BHK | 95.7 sqm | 41.7 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
⚠ 1 of 42 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Certificate from Chartered Account.
13 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
Statutory approval status
RERA filing10 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | Mahesh BS | MN 220945 | 2010 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560078 |
| Engineer | B E Pruthviraja | BCCL/BL-3.6/SE-0061/21-22 | 2008 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560083 |
| Architect | Pramod C | CA-2011/53412 | 2013 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560011 |
| Contractor | CoEvolve Estates Pvt. Ltd | - | 2005 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560095 |
Builder track record
RERA filingCoevolve Estates has 2 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 2 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹3.95 Cr collected from buyers, ₹3.03 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 87% → 89% (+2 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 177/381 (46%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹125.86 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹126.15 Cr (1.00x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 87% to 89% across the filed QPR window.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹25.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: STATE BANK OF INDIA. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 9 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 9 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 12 km |
| Electronic City | 15 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 21 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 24 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.