Bangalore/Project record

K-RERA · the public record

Embassy Springs - Phase 2A, Apartments

Devanahalli · EMBASSY DEVELOPMENTS

Project Review · example purchase

Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.

Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.

From another project · Prestige Park Grove

Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.

Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.

Read the Project Review sample ↗
Prestige Park Grove Project Review · first page
First page of the complete sample.
72%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
153units not bookedof 826 · Q1 2026 filing
28 Feb 2023declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026

Free project details

Registration read 25 Oct 2026

Construction progress and dates

Promoter-reported construction

K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026

declared completion

28 Feb 2023

The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.

K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026

Registered units and project size

Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026

The whole registration

7.8registered acres

106.2registered units per acre

The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.

RERA details for Embassy Springs - Phase 2A, Apartments

K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1250/303/PR/180526/001825

Project facts and comparisons

On the register

Declared completion28 February 2023
Land area31,461 sq m (7.8 acres)
Homes registered826
Tower/wing entries5

In context

Density106.2 homes per acre
Density in context79th percentile of 73 Devanahalli projects (median 67.4)

Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.

Project areas, parking and inventory

Project areas and parking

RERA filing
DisclosureOfficial valueWhy it matters
Registered units826Total inventory registered with K-RERA.
Registered land area31,461 sqmThe land area attached to this K-RERA registration.
Sanctioned FAR/FSI2.5Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design.
Registered tower/wing entries5Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page.
Parking total (reconciled)1,029Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Open-parking field334Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Garage field0Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Project start date20-02-2018

Official inventory & towers

RERA filing

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

Registered tower / wing summary

Tower/wingFloorsUnitsParkingHeight
Gardenia14252345-
Hibiscus14112158-
Fucshia14112158-
Daisy14196213-
Elderberry14154155-

Official unit register

RERA filing

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 406 official flat/unit rows vs 826 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

By unit type

Unit typeRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
Other30838.2-84.7 sqm21.6-49.9 sqm308
Others9838.2-84.7 sqm21.6-49.9 sqm98

By tower / wing

Tower/wingRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
Daisy9838.2-84.7 sqm21.6-49.9 sqm98
Elderberry9860.8-84.7 sqm35.2-49.9 sqm98
Gardenia9838.2-75.4 sqm21.6-45.8 sqm98
Fucshia5660.3-82.8 sqm35.1-49.6 sqm56
Hibiscus5660.3-82.8 sqm35.1-49.6 sqm56
Show sample official unit rows
UnitTowerFloorTypeCarpetUDSParking
101Gardenia1Other75.4 sqm44.0 sqm1
102Gardenia1Other75.4 sqm44.4 sqm1
103Gardenia1Other42.0 sqm24.7 sqm1
104Gardenia1Other38.2 sqm21.6 sqm1
105Gardenia1Other67.3 sqm39.9 sqm1
106Gardenia1Other59.7 sqm35.0 sqm1

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

Litigation & compliance

RERA filing

⚠ 32 litigation cases on record

  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2015)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2016)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2015)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2019)
  • Civil — 1 st Additional Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Yeshwanth (2020)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2006)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2011)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2006)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2014)
  • Civil — The Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka Hon'ble Judge Mr.Sunil Dutt Yadav (2025)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2015)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2015)
  • Civil — Additional Civil Judge & JMFC Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Chandrika (2015)
  • Civil — The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Venkatesh (2019)
  • Civil — The High Court of Karnataka Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anu Sivaraman and Hon'ble Justice Vijaykumar A Patil (2019)
  • Civil — Principal Civil Judge & JMFC Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Venkatesh (2015)
  • Civil — 2 Additional Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Yeshwanth (2015)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2015)
  • Civil — 2 Additional Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Yeshwanth (2013)
  • Civil — Additional Civil Judge & JMFC Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Chandrika (2016)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2015)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2016)
  • Civil — Additional Civil Judge & JMFC Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Chandrika (2015)
  • Civil — Additional Civil Judge & JMFC Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Chandrika (2015)
  • Civil — Principal Civil Judge & JMFC Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Venkatesh (2015)
  • Civil — Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Hon'ble Judge Praveen Nayak (2008)
  • Civil — High court of Karnataka Hon'ble Justice Ashok.S.Kinagi (2017)
  • Civil — The High Court of Karnataka Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K.Singh and Hon'ble Justice S.Rachaiah (2018)
  • Civil — The Additional Civil Judge, Devanahalli Judge Chandrika (2025)
  • Civil — III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Devanahalli Judge Yeshawanth (2025)
  • Civil — The Senior Civil Judge, Devanahalli Judge Praveen Nayak (2019)
  • Civil — 2 Additional Senior Civil Judge Devanahalli Yeshwanth (2021)

1 of 25 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 24 slots have usable uploaded filings.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →

K-RERA complaint orders (5 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)

PartiesRelief soughtDisposalOrder date
NARASIMHA SASTRY VASANTH vs EMBASSY SPRINGS PHASE 2Return of money paid of Rs 5.90 Lakhs + interest for the period till date @18% PA. No agreement or booking form executed.AUTHORITY31/10/2023
Prajit S Nair vs NAM Estaes Pvt Ltd.Request clarification on Rs.30000 which ws forefeitedAUTHORITY21/02/2023
ASHITA GUPTA vs NAM ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITEDRefund of the advance amount of Rs. 8,52,334/- along with 18% interest from the date of payment till realisation.AUTHORITY06/03/2025
Babu Shravani puri vs Emphasis Spring Phase 2AOrder to refund Rs. 8,06,350 with applicable interest and compensation for the delay & agony causedAUTHORITY03/12/2024
P. MAHESH SHANMUGAM & LAKSHMI MAHESH vs NAM ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITEDrefund of the amount paid initiallyAUTHORITY02/05/2024

⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.

Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (3 complaints listed against this promoter)

ComplaintSubject (as filed)ProjectStatus
CMP/211113/0008553
13-11-2021
Refund of Expression of Interest Amount not done despite remindersEmbassy Springs - Phase 1, Plotted Development (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4
CMP/211206/0008692
06-12-2021
Request Refund of Rs.30000/- forfeited amountEmbassy Springs - Phase 2A, ApartmentsDISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5
CMP/221014/0010102
14-10-2022
The total flat in booking from is higher than what was agreedEmbassy Springs - Phase 2A, ApartmentsDISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5

Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.

Statutory approval status

RERA filing

10 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.

Authority / NOCStatusDateFile

Project team & certifications

RERA filing

K-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

RoleNameRegistration / licenceSinceLocality
ArchitectSynergy Property Development Private Limited-200Intermediate Ring Road, Kormangala
Structural engineerNadig Consulting Private Limited---

Builder track record

RERA filing

Embassy has 9 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Embassy Developments”) (average reported construction progress 52%). 4 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.

Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.

Financials & Construction Progress

Financial disclosures

RERA filing

Latest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹15.17 Cr collected from buyers, ₹14.11 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.

Construction progress61% → 72% (+11 pts)
Units sold/booked as registered673/826 (81%)
Buyer collections in available QPRs₹66.20 Cr
Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs₹45.08 Cr (0.68x collections)
  • Construction progress moved from 61% to 72% across the filed QPR window.
  • The builder has drawn 0.68x of buyer collections from escrow (about 68% of the ₹66 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.

QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹41.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.

RERA 70% project account is on file: KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK MG Road (IFSC KKBK0008066, a/c …5352). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

Location & Connectivity

The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 18 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.

LandmarkStraight-line
Kempegowda Int'l Airport9 km
Outer Ring Road / Manyata18 km
MG Road / city centre25 km
Whitefield IT hub29 km
Bellandur–Marathahalli belt31 km
Electronic City40 km

Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.

Free · Watch this project

We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.

Something went wrong — email hello@quietlist.in.

✓ You're watching — we'll email you if the RERA record changes.

Built by Embassy Developments. View Embassy Developments's full track record →
Embassy Developments has 5 projects registered in Bangalore, 1 completed, 1 past RERA deadline.

Other projects by this builder in Bangalore

Embassy Greenshore
Filing overdue · 10% built · 71% sold
Embassy Paradiso
Filing overdue · 95% built
Embassy Verde
Filing overdue · 20% built · 99% sold
Embassy Verde Phase 2
Filing overdue · 3% built · 99% sold

Other RERA-registered projects in Devanahalli

Major developers building in Devanahalli

Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.

Registration last seen on RERA: 25 Oct 2026. Document and inventory dates are shown in their sections.