K-RERA · the public record
FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited
· FIRE Luxur Developers
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a unit? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your unit, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗Free project details
Registration read 16 Jul 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
The whole registration
35.2registered acres
4.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1265/347/PR/171015/000717
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 159 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 12,302 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 142,611 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.23457 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 138 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 05-08-2011 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| VILLA | 76 | 100% | 12,302 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Empyrean | 0 | 159 | 138 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 159 official flat/unit rows, matching the 159 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 59 | 125.6-189.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 59 |
| NA | 48 | 154.7-578.2 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (48 with 0) |
| 4BHK | 47 | 179.7-302.3 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 69 |
| 5BHK | 5 | 244.6-284.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 10 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Empyrean | 159 | 125.6-578.2 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 138 (48 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 303 Floria | The Empyrean | 0 | 3BHK | 125.6 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 304 Floria | The Empyrean | 0 | 3BHK | 125.6 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 305 Floria | The Empyrean | 0 | 3BHK | 125.6 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 306 Plot | The Empyrean | 0 | NA | 173.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
| 307 Plot | The Empyrean | 0 | NA | 166.9 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
| 310 Harmonia | The Empyrean | 0 | 4BHK | 214.9 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 32 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Mar 2023, extended (Covid Extension) to 31 Dec 2023 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (4 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empyrean Owners Association represented by Mr Satish Nair vs FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited | Direct the respondent to complete all amenities in the project, render accounts in respect of the maintenances charges collected, not to deviate from the scheme of the project amongst others | AUTHORITY | 05/06/2023 |
| JAVEESH KUMAR & RICHA SHARMA vs FIRE LUXUR DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | 5. Further to 4 prayers above, restrain Promoter from service charge levy for attending to maintenance issues at registered units. Such payments till date to be adjusted against future maintenance fee | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2023 |
| PARAG SESHRAO LANGDE & POONAM PARAG LANGDE vs FIRE LUXUR DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | 5. Further to 4 prayers above, restrain Promoter from service charge levy for attending to maintenance issues at registered units. Such payments till date to be adjusted against future maintenance fee | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2023 |
| RADHA J EAPEN vs FIRE LUXUR | 5. Further to 4 prayers above, restrain Promoter from service charge levy for attending to maintenance issues at registered units. Such payments till date to be adjusted against future maintenance fee | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190223/0002254 23-02-2019 | Non completion of common ammenties as promised by builder | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190223/0002262 23-02-2019 | Non completion of common amenities as promised by builder | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190307/0002375 07-03-2019 | Promised Amenities Not delivered | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190512/0002980 12-05-2019 | Non Delivery of promised amenities by the promoter | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/UR/200605/0005965 05-06-2020 | sales in the nature of plots when project represented as a villa project, deviation from plan sanction, incomplete amenities, return of corpus amongst others | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220112/0008780 12-01-2022 | Breach of representations and sanctioned layout plan, pending amenities, and levy of arbitrary maintenance charges | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220112/0008781 12-01-2022 | Breach of representations and sanctioned plan, pending amenities and arbitrary maintenance charges | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220112/0008782 12-01-2022 | Breach of representations, sanctioned layout plan, incomplete amenities, and arbitrary maintenance charges | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Sundaram Architects Pvt Ltd | - | 1998 | Gandhi Nagar, Kumarakrupa Road |
| Contractor | Capric Associates | - | - | Sector 27, Gurgaon |
| Structural engineer | M/s Manhohar Consultants | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingFire Luxur has 3 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 67%). 0 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹61.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank Whitefield Main Road (IFSC UTIB0002177, a/c …6031). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 14 project-photo uploads.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 0 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 0 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 8 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 15 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 16 km |
| Electronic City | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 26 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.