Sobha Sentosa Phase 2 Wing 5 And 6
K-RERA · the public record
HIGHCLIFF
Bengaluru East · HIREN WAHEN BUILDTECH
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
82%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
79units not bookedof 196 · Q1 2026 filing
22 Apr 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
76%
Q3 2025
79%
Q4 2025
82%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
22 Apr 2019
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
1 Bed + 1T
77
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
1.2registered acres
169.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for HIGHCLIFF
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/171031/001436
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion22 April 2019
Land area4,694 sq m (1.2 acres)
Homes registered196
Tower/wing entries3
Unit mix77 × 1 Bed + 1T
In context
Density169 homes per acre
Density in context98th percentile of 1123 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.5)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 196 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 3,060 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 4,694 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 249 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 229 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 21-07-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bed + 1T | 77 | 100% | 3,060 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 13 | 79 | 83 | - |
| B | 13 | 65 | 83 | - |
| C | 13 | 52 | 83 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 196 official flat/unit rows, matching the 196 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BHK | 77 | 32.6-46.2 sqm | 158.2-204.5 sqm | 77 |
| 2 BHK | 39 | 65.9-74.6 sqm | 278.3-340.8 sqm | 39 |
| 2.5 BHK | 39 | 85.1-98.2 sqm | 365.4-429.4 sqm | 39 |
| 3 BHK | 39 | 105.5-111.4 sqm | 463.7-487.5 sqm | 39 |
| 3BHK | 1 | 131.2 sqm | 551.0 sqm | 1 |
| 4BHK | 1 | 174.9 sqm | 749.8 sqm | 1 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 79 | 32.6-174.9 sqm | 158.2-749.8 sqm | 79 |
| B | 65 | 65.9-90.2 sqm | 278.3-374.5 sqm | 65 |
| C | 52 | 98.2-111.4 sqm | 429.4-487.5 sqm | 52 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1-201 | A | 2 | 4BHK | 174.9 sqm | 749.8 sqm | 1 |
| A2-202 | A | 2 | 3BHK | 131.2 sqm | 551.0 sqm | 1 |
| A1-301 | A | 3 | 1BHK | 41.3 sqm | 184.2 sqm | 1 |
| A2-302 | A | 3 | 1BHK | 32.6 sqm | 163.8 sqm | 1 |
| A3-303 | A | 3 | 1BHK | 39.5 sqm | 167.0 sqm | 1 |
| A4-304 | A | 3 | 1BHK | 39.3 sqm | 177.8 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
1 of 28 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 27 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
2 K-RERA orders on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (9 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANKUR S/O AJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY vs M/S HIREN WAHEN BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED | I want to refund the entire amount of RS.804413 with interest as per RERA provision | AUTHORITY | 30/09/2023 |
| Akshat Daharwal vs HIREN WAHEN BUILDTECH | Investigate the builder's actions along with the project's progress. Enforce builder to pay compensation for the delay in possession which was supposed to be in Dec'2020. | AUTHORITY | 28/04/2026 |
| Abha Daharwal vs HIREN WAHEN BUILDTECH | Stop harassment and threats from builder. Force builder to re-initiate construction and complete as per RERA agreed schedule. Pay interest for the delay. | AUTHORITY | 28/04/2026 |
| SAURAV BHAUMICK vs HIREN WAHEN BUILDTECH | Refund with compensation | AUTHORITY | 27/04/2026 |
| Vinay vs HIREN WAHEN BUILDTECH | 1.Direct the Developer to delivered & register flat within 2 months . 2.Direct the developer to pay the interest on delay period of 18% per annum from 6/4/2019 till the execution of the sale deed. | AUTHORITY | 27/04/2026 |
| Vinay vs HIREN WAHEN BUILDTECH | 1. Direct the Developer to delivered & register flat within 2 months. 2. Direct the developer to pay the interest on delay period of 18% per annum from 6/4/2019 till the execution of the sale deed. | AUTHORITY | 27/04/2026 |
| Vinay vs HIREN WAHEN BUILDTECH | 1. Direct the Developer to delivered & register flat within 2 months. 2. Direct the developer to pay the interest on delay period of 18% per annum from 6/4/2019 till the execution of the sale deed. | AUTHORITY | 27/04/2026 |
| VIKAS VITTHAL MASTUD vs NAREN BABU LALIT SINGH WAHEN (HIGHCLIFF) | Full Refund + 18% Interest for Entire period | AUTHORITY | 13/10/2022 |
| ANAND SIDDHARTH K & AKSHAYA H vs HIREN WAHEN BUILDTECH (2) WAHENGBAM LALIT SINGH | Cancellation of allotment, subject to the condition that the promoter refunds the entire amount of INR 25,00,000 with applicable interest | AUTHORITY | 09/03/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (4 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190730/0003217 30-07-2019 | Not refunding the amount | HIGHCLIFF | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190730/0003564 30-07-2019 | Full Refund not Initiated | HIGHCLIFF | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200820/0002147 20-08-2020 | REFUND PENDING - Cancellation with No refund of Booking Amount | HIGHCLIFF | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211227/0008752 27-12-2021 | Suppression of facts about the pending legal formalities ( RERA Approval and TDR ) and harassment by the promotor | HIGHCLIFF | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing7 of 7 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
3 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 22-10-2024 | 1 BWSSB NOC 22-10-2024.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 04-10-2024 | 2 PCB NOC-CFE Exp 04-10-2024.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 08-03-2023 | 3 MOEF NOC 08-03-2023.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 17-04-2023 | 5 BESCOM NOC - 17- 04-2023.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 28-05-2024 | 7 FIRE NOC-28-05-2024.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 31-05-2023 | 8 AIR PORT NOC 31-05-2023_compressed.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 15-03-2024 | BSNL NOC Received as on 15-03-2024.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | VBT CONSORTIUM | - | 2004 | SADASHIVANAGAR, BANGALORE |
| Contractor | KNK GROUP | - | 1970 | 4TH T BLOCK, ASHOKA PILLAR |
| Structural engineer | PRASAD CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹6.33 Cr collected from buyers, ₹4.43 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 76% → 82% (+6 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 117/196 (60%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹27.03 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹20.61 Cr (0.76x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 76% to 82% across the filed QPR window.
- The builder has drawn 0.76x of buyer collections from escrow (about 76% of the ₹27 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹30.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Kadubesanahalli, Marathahalli Junction (IFSC HDFC0003636, a/c …1780). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 5 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 3 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 15 km |
| Electronic City | 18 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 24 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.