K-RERA · the public record
RAAGA
Bengaluru East · KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.3registered acres
132.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for RAAGA
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/171014/000856
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 299 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 21,198 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 9,129 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.9 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 334 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 79 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 25-04-2014 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 bhk, 3 bhk | 299 | 100% | 21,198 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WING D | 13 | 104 | 116 | - |
| WING E | 13 | 91 | 102 | - |
| WING F | 13 | 104 | 116 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 299 official flat/unit rows, matching the 299 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 - BHK | 156 | 71.4-84.0 sqm | 30.1-34.6 sqm | 0 (156 with 0) |
| 2 - BHK | 143 | 59.7-70.4 sqm | 25.5-29.3 sqm | 0 (143 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WING D | 104 | 59.7-72.1 sqm | 25.5-30.2 sqm | 0 (104 with 0) |
| WING F | 104 | 83.1-84.0 sqm | 34.2-34.6 sqm | 0 (104 with 0) |
| WING E | 91 | 67.5-70.4 sqm | 28.2-29.3 sqm | 0 (91 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K - 101 | WING D | 1 | 3 - BHK | 71.9 sqm | 30.2 sqm | 0 |
| K - 102 | WING D | 1 | 3 - BHK | 71.8 sqm | 30.2 sqm | 0 |
| K - 103 | WING D | 1 | 3 - BHK | 71.9 sqm | 30.1 sqm | 0 |
| K - 104 | WING D | 1 | 3 - BHK | 72.1 sqm | 30.1 sqm | 0 |
| L - 101 | WING D | 1 | 2 - BHK | 63.2 sqm | 26.4 sqm | 0 |
| L - 102 | WING D | 1 | 2 - BHK | 63.1 sqm | 26.4 sqm | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 21 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 24 Apr 2021, extended (Covid Extension) to 24 Jan 2022 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (12 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ram Kumar Verma vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Not yet ( this is first complaint to get compensation adjusted) | AUTHORITY | 31/03/2022 |
| GAURAV BANERJEE vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Compensation and damages for delay, more details as mentioned in the Complaint Uploaded. The Reliefs Sough are briefly explained in the attachment titled "RERA Complaint- Gaurav Banerjee" | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| SHYAM SUNDER TAPARIA vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Consumer Rights and Builder not abiding by penalty clause of agreement to pay compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| RAKESH KUMAR SINGH vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Return of money paid towards booking amount and part payment of sale consideration along with compensation for mental agony and loss caused as a result of respondent's default. | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| RAMESH PAREET vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Compensation against delay of project Raaga by 54 months as RERA guidelines | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| RAJBIR KAUR vs RAAGA | New basement covered car parking without any defects | AUTHORITY | 20/09/2023 |
| UMESH SHYAM KALASANNAVAR vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Compensation against delay of project Raaga by 54 months as RERA guidelines | AUTHORITY | 18/03/2023 |
| WREN PAUL JR vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Should get a 24% interest on the amount deposited / part payment done towards the construction paid till date. | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2022 |
| RANJAN LAHIRI vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | I request RERA Karnataka team to intervene in this matter and expedite the refund as the builder is consistently delaying the refund process and that is causing additional harassment to me | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2022 |
| Avinash Kumar vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Compensation towards delay with ongoing market Rent of 20,000PM from March2016 - April 2021, Interest on delayed compensation and on Amount paid to builder at 18% per annum for same time period. | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| Asha Lobo vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Delay compensation as per RERA | AUTHORITY | 09/01/2023 |
| SREEKANTH S vs RAAGA | Decree to issue compensation for the delay caused from July 2020 to Dec 2020 | AUTHORITY | 04/09/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (44 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190304/0002340 04-03-2019 | Delay compensation as per RERA | MIRABILIS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190307/0002278 07-03-2019 | Delay in delivery of flat (C401) and delay compensation not paid | MIRABILIS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190806/0003491 06-08-2019 | Delay Compensation | MIRABILIS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/190922/0004268 22-09-2019 | Regarding penalty compensation for delayed possession | MIRABILIS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190922/0004271 22-09-2019 | Compensation for late delivery and other concerns. | MIRABILIS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190928/0004337 28-09-2019 | Compensation for late delivery and other concerns | MIRABILIS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/191004/0004411 04-10-2019 | Compensation for delayed apartment delivery as per RERA | MIRABILIS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/191005/0004368 05-10-2019 | Delay compensation as per Rera rules | MIRABILIS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | TEAM - 2 | - | 1997 | Karnataka, India |
| Structural engineer | SEMAC CONSULTANTS PVT.LIMITED | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingKolte-Patil has 2 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 2 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹28.8 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: INDUSIND BANK M G ROAD BANGALORE (IFSC INDB0000008, a/c …9134). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 5 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 3 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 15 km |
| Electronic City | 18 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 24 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.