K-RERA · the public record
Juniper at Brigade Orchards
Devanahalli · BCV Developers
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
5.3registered acres
92.8registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Juniper at Brigade Orchards
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1250/303/PR/170916/000462
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 493 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 64 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 21,508 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.49 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 6 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 493 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 38 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 21-06-2016 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1BHK+1T | 1 | 100% | 64 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 8 | 35 | 35 | - |
| B | 13 | 105 | 105 | - |
| C | 14 | 117 | 117 | - |
| D | 14 | 60 | 60 | - |
| E | 14 | 59 | 59 | - |
| F | 14 | 117 | 117 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 493 official flat/unit rows, matching the 493 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK | 416 | 96.0-108.3 sqm | 40.5-47.6 sqm | 416 |
| 2 BHK | 66 | 75.7-87.6 sqm | 33.0-40.0 sqm | 66 |
| Penthouse 3 BHK | 10 | 175.7-189.9 sqm | 75.1-83.3 sqm | 10 |
| 1 BHK | 1 | 64.4 sqm | 29.0 sqm | 1 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 117 | 87.6-189.9 sqm | 40.0-83.2 sqm | 117 |
| F | 117 | 87.6-175.7 sqm | 40.0-75.2 sqm | 117 |
| B | 105 | 75.7-189.9 sqm | 33.3-83.3 sqm | 105 |
| D | 60 | 100.7-104.6 sqm | 44.2-46.0 sqm | 60 |
| E | 59 | 87.6-104.6 sqm | 40.0-46.0 sqm | 59 |
| A | 35 | 64.4-78.8 sqm | 29.0-33.8 sqm | 35 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A G01 | A | 0 | 2 BHK | 77.0 sqm | 33.0 sqm | 1 |
| A G02 | A | 0 | 2 BHK | 77.0 sqm | 33.0 sqm | 1 |
| A G03 | A | 0 | 2 BHK | 77.0 sqm | 33.0 sqm | 1 |
| A 101 | A | 1 | 2 BHK | 77.0 sqm | 33.0 sqm | 1 |
| A 102 | A | 1 | 2 BHK | 77.0 sqm | 33.0 sqm | 1 |
| A 103 | A | 1 | 2 BHK | 77.0 sqm | 33.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 19 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019, extended (an extension) to 31 Dec 2020 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. An extension application filed on 24 Feb 2020 is pending with K-RERA — until it is approved, the registration stands lapsed.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (5 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joel Dsouza vs Juniper at Brigade Orchards | I want the builder to pay the property tax as stated on BSK website + compensate me for undelivered club house amenity + also refund the 24k that is collected to access the make shift club house | AUTHORITY | 28/07/2025 |
| G GAYATHRI vs BCV DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | 1. Compensation for Delayed possession for apartment (till date project construction is ongoing) - as per agreement, i am entitled to compensation (2% + Base Rate). This is Approximately INR 25 lakhs. | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Purnendu Hazra vs BCV Developers Pvt Ltd | Refund of Rs.76,31,427 with compensation Interest | AUTHORITY | 18/10/2022 |
| PUNEET SINGH SHAUHAN vs M/S BCV DEVELOPERS PVT LTD., | It is my humble request to notify the builder to either allow me to visit the apartment before registration or pursue registration later when they can show me my apartment with me being present | AUTHORITY | 13/12/2021 |
| Dr ASHA A vs B C V DEVELOPERS PVT .LTD. | award refund of entire sale consideration with interest at the rate of 18% from the date of remittance till to realization, award damages for having violated the agreed terms, pass any other order/s | AUTHORITY | 08/07/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (4 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/201113/0007055 13-11-2020 | deviation in the construction plan | Juniper at Brigade Orchards | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210120/0007451 20-01-2021 | Complaint for Refund with Compensation | Juniper at Brigade Orchards | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/210308/0007763 08-03-2021 | Registration without flat demonstration | Juniper at Brigade Orchards | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220524/0009514 24-05-2022 | Delayed Possession and pending facilities yet to be completed | Juniper at Brigade Orchards | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Studio30 Architects & Planners | - | 2002 | North block Rehaja Chambers, 12 Musuem Road |
| Contractor | Probity Constructions Pvt. Ltd. | - | 2006 | Connectionn Point, HAL Airport Exit Road Murugeshpalya |
| Structural engineer | Melior Structural Solutions (P) ltd | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingBcv Developers has 9 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 66%). 4 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹5.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank Malleswaram (IFSC UTIB0000227, a/c …9330). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 23 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 3 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 23 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 29 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 31 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 33 km |
| Electronic City | 43 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.