Aiikya Village Sarjapur
K-RERA · the public record
Motzkin Park Terrace
Anekal · Motzkin Ventures
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a villa? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your villa, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best villas.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project · Sterling Villa Grande — Phase II · earlier comprehensive example
Two curved rows. Different lake-side choices.
A radial fronts the oval across the loop road; B radial faces the outer drive. The report compares all six villa types, from pool-equipped A to three-bedroom B and smaller C, with all 74 registered villa numbers. The March 2026 completion application’s three unsold homes are not identified; these are not live availability recommendations.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Sterling Villa Grande — Phase II sample report ↗
87%construction reportedQ3 2025 filing
27units not bookedof 49 · Q3 2025 filing
31 Dec 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
87%
Q3 2025
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q3 2025
declared completion
31 Dec 2019
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
4 BHK
32
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.1registered acres
23.8registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Motzkin Park Terrace
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/180120/001659
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2019
Land area8,337 sq m (2.1 acres)
Homes registered49
Tower/wing entries49
Unit mix32 × 4 BHK
In context
Density23.8 homes per acre
Density in context15th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 49 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 7,201 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 8,337 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.5 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 49 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 48 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-04-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 BHK | 32 | 100% | 7,201 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
Showing first 8 of 49 tower/wing rows.
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 49 official flat/unit rows, matching the 49 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5BHK | 32 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 32 |
| 4BHK | 16 | 191.8 sqm | 153.5 sqm | 16 |
| NA | 1 | 469.2 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (1 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 12 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 12A | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 14 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 15 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 16 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 17 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
Showing first 12 of 49 tower/wing groups.
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 5BHK | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 5BHK | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | 5BHK | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | 5BHK | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | 5BHK | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
| 6 | 6 | 0 | 5BHK | 236.4 sqm | 189.2 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
2 of 33 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 31 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019, extended (Extension) to 31 Dec 2025 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 20 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/220620/001659) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
2 K-RERA orders on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION, PROJECT MODIFICATION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (2 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRANAV SINGH vs MOTZKIN PAKR TERRACE | Refund and compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/05/2023 |
| Gagan Asthana vs MOTZKIN PARK | Developer to refund Rs 840000 to the plaintiff. Developer refund amount paid at every stage a follows Till 30-04-2017 with 9% SI, from May'17 till full amount is settled has to pay with 2% SI | AUTHORITY | 19/03/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (3 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200107/0005162 07-01-2020 | Non Completion of Construction of Villa | Motzkin Park Terrace | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200516/0005863 16-05-2020 | Non completion of project for over five years | Motzkin Park Terrace | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220820/0009924 20-08-2022 | Project not completed and request for compensation | Motzkin Park Terrace | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing1 of 2 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Other recorded statuses: KPTCL- BESCOM: To Be Applied. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
8 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 19-05-2023 | Water NoC.jpeg |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | To Be Applied | - | View NOC |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 1 project professional/vendor row across Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractor | Brickmen Builders and Developers LLP | - | 2017 | BHCS layout, BTM 2nd stage |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2025-Q3): ₹0.00 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.00 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 87% → 87% (+0 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 22/49 (45%) |
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹36.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK Bommanhalli (IFSC KKBK0008057, a/c …8006). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 13 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 13 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 15 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 16 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 25 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 29 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 42 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.