Desai Empire
K-RERA · the public record
Roma Epicurean
Bengaluru East · Roma Builders
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Dec 2020declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
191registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.5registered acres
76.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Roma Epicurean
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/180627/001940
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2020
Land area10,165 sq m (2.5 acres)
Homes registered191
Tower/wing entries1
In context
Density76 homes per acre
Density in context50th percentile of 1123 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.5)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 191 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 10,165 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.24 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 220 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-01-2016 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epicurean | 5 | 191 | 220 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 95 official flat/unit rows vs 191 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2bhk | 63 | 932.0-1,360.0 sqft | 5.0 sqft | 63 |
| 3bhk | 24 | 1,002.0-1,338.0 sqft | 5.0 sqft | 24 |
| 3bkh | 8 | 1,002.0 sqft | 5.0 sqft | 8 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epicurean | 95 | 932.0-1,360.0 sqft | 5.0 sqft | 95 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Epicurean | 1 | 2bhk | 996.0 sqft | 5.0 sqft | 1 |
| 102 | Epicurean | 1 | 2bhk | 999.0 sqft | 5.0 sqft | 1 |
| 103 | Epicurean | 1 | 2bhk | 999.0 sqft | 5.0 sqft | 1 |
| 104 | Epicurean | 1 | 2bhk | 999.0 sqft | 5.0 sqft | 1 |
| 105 | Epicurean | 1 | 2bhk | 999.0 sqft | 5.0 sqft | 1 |
| 106 | Epicurean | 1 | 2bhk | 1,002.0 sqft | 5.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
10 of 14 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 4 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2020, extended (Covid Extension) to 30 Sep 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Not identified in the document list
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Not identified in the document list
Fire NOCNot identified in the document list
Pollution control (KSPCB)Not identified in the document list
Environmental clearanceNot identified in the document list
Airport Authority height clearanceNot identified in the document list
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (4 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRIJESH S BATHIJA vs ROMA EPICUREAN | refund of consideration with reg fee and int @ 18% | AUTHORITY | 30/08/2019 |
| KOLLURI SURESH BABU vs M/S.ROMA BUILDERS | new complaint | AUTHORITY | 14/03/2023 |
| DEEPAK MAHALIK vs M/S.ROMA BUILDERS | Not received a single amount and need all the amount to be refunded with interest and compensession | AUTHORITY | 13/02/2023 |
| MUSHTARI ABID SHERIEF vs M/S ROMA BUILDERS | Return of amount and compensation | AUTHORITY | 12/07/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (5 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190305/0002311 05-03-2019 | flat no.207 registered in june 2017 | Roma Epicurean | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/191206/0003177 06-12-2019 | project delayed, no updates on progress, no cumminication, no work progress | Roma Epicurean | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200131/0005334 31-01-2020 | Project is on hold for 5 years and Builder is not reachable | Roma Epicurean | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/200622/0005983 22-06-2020 | Return of amount and compensation | Roma Epicurean | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/200902/0005622 02-09-2020 | Builder not returning amount and not completing the construction | Roma Epicurean | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹18.3 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Canara Bank Marathahalli (IFSC CNRB0000768, a/c …1985). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 2 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 2 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 6 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 14 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 15 km |
| Electronic City | 16 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 26 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.