K-RERA · the public record
TVS Emerald Jardin
Bengaluru South · Emerald Haven Development
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
5.7registered acres
101.9registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for TVS Emerald Jardin
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/160522/004884
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 581 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 38,308 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 80,522 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 23,066 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.24 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 581 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 580 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 119 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | PRJ/12002/21-22IN | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 21-04-2022 | |
| Project start date | 15-06-2022 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK 3T | 104 | 18% | 9,257 sqm |
| 3BHK 2T | 136 | 23% | 10,534 sqm |
| 1BHK | 60 | 10% | 2,226 sqm |
| 2BHK 2T | 281 | 48% | 16,289 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block-A | 18 | 160 | 160 | 58.5 m |
| Block-B | 18 | 139 | 139 | 58.5 m |
| Block-C | 18 | 140 | 140 | 58.5 m |
| Block-D | 18 | 142 | 142 | 58.5 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 581 official flat/unit rows, matching the 581 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK 2T | 281 | 57.4-69.5 sqm | 30.6-37.1 sqm | 281 |
| 3BHK 2T | 136 | 77.5 sqm | 41.1 sqm | 136 |
| 3BHK 3T | 104 | 88.8-89.0 sqm | 46.9-48.4 sqm | 104 |
| 1BHK 1T | 60 | 35.9-45.0 sqm | 19.9-22.9 sqm | 60 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block-A | 160 | 35.9-89.0 sqm | 19.9-48.4 sqm | 160 |
| Block-D | 142 | 45.0-77.5 sqm | 22.9-41.1 sqm | 142 |
| Block-C | 140 | 45.0-89.0 sqm | 22.9-48.4 sqm | 140 |
| Block-B | 139 | 45.0-89.0 sqm | 22.9-48.4 sqm | 139 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A101 | Block-A | 1 | 3BHK 3T | 89.0 sqm | 48.4 sqm | 1 |
| A102 | Block-A | 1 | 3BHK 3T | 89.0 sqm | 48.4 sqm | 1 |
| A103 | Block-A | 1 | 1BHK 1T | 45.0 sqm | 22.9 sqm | 1 |
| A104 | Block-A | 1 | 1BHK 1T | 45.0 sqm | 22.9 sqm | 1 |
| A105 | Block-A | 1 | 3BHK 2T | 77.5 sqm | 41.1 sqm | 1 |
| A106 | Block-A | 1 | 3BHK 2T | 77.5 sqm | 41.1 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
⚠ 9 of 32 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the building, Urban Land Ceiling, Collaboration Agreement/Development Agreement/Joint Development Agreement/Other Agreement, Change of Land Use, District Magistrate and more.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (2 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kavitha Vishwanath vs Emerald Haven Development Limited | Cancel Project registration for TVS Emerald Jardin | AUTHORITY | 14/05/2024 |
| Vicky anand vs tvs eMERALD jARDIN | I would urge to please ask the TV's emerald team to return my unit, I shall pay the entire amount which is pending | AUTHORITY | 10/06/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | G Muralidharan | F R No : 003590S & Partner M No : 015530 | 1960 | Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600008 |
| Engineer | PRADEEP G KEDLAYA | BCCL/BL-3.6/SE-0331/21-22 | 2010 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560024 |
| Architect | V Narasimhan | CA/86/10034 | 1970 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560025 |
| Contractor | NA | - | 0000 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 000000 |
Builder track record
RERA filingEmerald Haven has 3 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 27%). 0 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹30.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC BENGALURU - RICHMOND ROAD IFSC Code : HDFC0000523 Pin Code : 560025. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 3 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 3 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 9 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 16 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 19 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 37 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.