Aiikya Village Sarjapur
K-RERA · the public record
URBAN SERENITY
Anekal · INNER URBAN INFRAESTATE
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a villa? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your villa, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best villas.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project · Sterling Villa Grande — Phase II · earlier comprehensive example
Two curved rows. Different lake-side choices.
A radial fronts the oval across the loop road; B radial faces the outer drive. The report compares all six villa types, from pool-equipped A to three-bedroom B and smaller C, with all 74 registered villa numbers. The March 2026 completion application’s three unsold homes are not identified; these are not live availability recommendations.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Sterling Villa Grande — Phase II sample report ↗
31 Dec 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
107registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
PLOT/VILLA
105
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
7.3registered acres
14.7registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for URBAN SERENITY
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/171102/001592
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2019
Land area29,440 sq m (7.3 acres)
Homes registered107
Tower/wing entries107
Unit mix105 × PLOT/VILLA
In context
Density14.7 homes per acre
Density in context6th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 107 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 200,936 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 29,440 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.5 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 107 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 125 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-04-2016 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLOT/VILLA | 105 | 100% | 200,936 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | - |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - |
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | - |
Showing first 8 of 107 tower/wing rows.
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 107 official flat/unit rows, matching the 107 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUPLEX | 101 | 1,511.0-2,479.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 124 |
| 4BHK | 4 | 1,805.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 4 |
| COMMERCIAL | 2 | 0.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (2 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (1 with 0) |
| 10 | 1 | 2,280.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 2 |
| 100 | 1 | 1,805.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 101 | 1 | 1,805.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 102 | 1 | 1,805.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 103 | 1 | 1,805.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 104 | 1 | 1,805.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 105 | 1 | 1,805.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 106 | 1 | 1,805.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 107 | 1 | 1,805.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | 2,280.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 2 |
| 12 | 1 | 2,280.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 2 |
Showing first 12 of 107 tower/wing groups.
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | COMMERCIAL | 0.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | DUPLEX | 2,280.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | DUPLEX | 2,280.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 2 |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | DUPLEX | 2,280.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 2 |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | DUPLEX | 2,280.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 2 |
| 5 | 6 | 0 | DUPLEX | 2,280.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 2 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
18 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 17 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Jun 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 22 May 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/200522/001592) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Not identified in the document list
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Document listed: BWSSB
Fire NOCNot identified in the document list
Pollution control (KSPCB)Not identified in the document list
Environmental clearanceNot identified in the document list
Airport Authority height clearanceNot identified in the document list
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (7 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Naga Hemanth Laksmi Pradeep Kumar vs INNER URBAN INFRA ESTATE PVT LTD | Prescribed rate of Delay compensation from date of promised possession till obtaining completion/occupancy certificate under proviso to Section 18(1) read with Section 19(10) of RERA Act | AUTHORITY | 31/10/2022 |
| SURESH S MENON vs URBAN SERENITY | Direct Promoter to (a)procure completion and/or occupancy certificate, (b)complete project in three months, (c)establish permanent BESCOM connection, (d)construct Jogging track, (e)install solar. | AUTHORITY | 14/03/2023 |
| DIBYA RANJAN MOHANTY vs URBAN SERSNITY | Direct Promoter to (a)procure completion and/or occupancy certificate, (b)complete project in three months, (c)establish permanent BESCOM connection, (d)construct Jogging track, (e)install solar. | AUTHORITY | 14/03/2023 |
| NAGA HEMANTH LAKSHIPRADEEP KUMAR vs URBAN SERENITY | Direct Promoter to (a)procure completion and/or occupancy certificate, (b)complete project in three months, (c)establish permanent BESCOM connection, (d)construct Jogging track, (e)install solar. | AUTHORITY | 14/03/2023 |
| Suresh S Menon vs INNER URBAN INFRAESTATE PVT LTD | Prescribed rate of Delay compensation from date of promised possession till obtaining occupancy certificate under proviso to Section 18(1) read with Section 19(10) of RERA Act | AUTHORITY | 11/10/2022 |
| Dibya Ranjan Mohanty vs INNER URBAN INFRA ESTATE PVT LTD | Prescribed rate of Delay compensation from date of promised possession till obtaining completion/occupancy certificate under proviso to Section 18(1) read with Section 19(10) of RERA Act | AUTHORITY | 10/10/2022 |
| ABIRAMI SIVARAMAKRISHNAN vs INNER URBAN INFRAESTATE PVT LTD | Builder to pay interest up-to-date and interest for every month until date of receipt of Occupation certificate by me and return of excess amounts collected + provision of solar water heater | AUTHORITY | 05/06/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (7 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210523/0007956 23-05-2021 | Villa and project incomplete in status | URBAN SERENITY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211126/0008634 26-11-2021 | Compensation for Delay in handing over Villa | URBAN SERENITY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/211126/0008635 26-11-2021 | Compensation for delay in handing over Villa | URBAN SERENITY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/211126/0008636 26-11-2021 | Compensation for delay in handing over the Villa | URBAN SERENITY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220203/0008935 03-02-2022 | Direction to Promoter | URBAN SERENITY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220203/0008936 03-02-2022 | Direction to Promoter | URBAN SERENITY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220203/0008940 03-02-2022 | Direction to Promoter | URBAN SERENITY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Jamuna Chalam | - | 2004 | Koramangala IV Block, Bangalore - 560095 |
| Contractor | INNER URBAN INFRAESTATE PVT LTD | - | 2011 | NO 523 GROUND FLOOR 24TH MAIN, SECTOR -2 HSR LAYOUT BANGALORE |
| Structural engineer | ARUN RAO | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹56.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Union Bank of India HSR LAYOUT (IFSC UBIN0554626, a/c …0451). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 14 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 14 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 15 km |
| Electronic City | 15 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 25 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 29 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 39 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.