Makhdoom Heights
MahaRERA · the public record
Avhad Homestead
Mahim · Hrub Infra Projects Private Limited
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Empire Solitaire
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Dosti Pine · earlier comprehensive example
North-east at the door. Or in the living room.
E2506 has north-east-facing living space and a south-west entrance. E3001 reverses those directions and sits on the top floor. The report compares named flats, refuge adjacency and shared gardens using the March 2026 filing, read on 17 September 2026; this is not live availability.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Dosti Pine sample report ↗
0units filed as unsoldInventory · 24 October 2026
31 Dec 2029declared completionMahaRERA registration · read 10 Sep 2026
24registered unitsMahaRERA registration · read 10 Sep 2026
Free project details
Registration read 10 Sep 2026RERA details for Avhad Homestead
MahaRERA · PR1170002601379
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
Avhad Homestead is registered with MahaRERA as PR1170002601379 and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Dec 2029.
31 Dec 2029
declared completion
38months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
| MahaRERA registration | PR1170002601379 |
| Registered on | 31 Jul 2026 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 31 Dec 2029 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 38 months to the declared date |
Promoter record
What else is this promoter on record for?
Hrub Infra Projects Private Limited is the promoter of record on 2 projects registered with MahaRERA.
2projects
registered with MahaRERA
Counted across Quietlist's full MahaRERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · MahaRERA register, all projects · read 10 Sep 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In Avhad Homestead, 0 of 2 homes filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked, about 0%, and 2 are filed as unsold.
0%sold or booked
0 of 2 homes
Counts as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability. The registration lists 24 homes; this inventory lists 2. These are separate filed records. Their counts do not match; neither count establishes today's availability.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 10 Sep 2026
The units recorded as unsold on the filing. The reckoner value is the government's ready-reckoner assessment the promoter filed against that unit, the figure stamp duty is charged on. It is not a price anyone paid, not an asking price, and not a valuation of the unit.
| Floor | Unit | Carpet | Govt reckoner value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor 9 | 903 | 705 sqft (65.52 sqm) | ₹1.71 Cr |
| Floor 9 | 904 | 702 sqft (65.22 sqm) | ₹1.70 Cr |
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
Sales
Are registered sale-agreement prices available?
No registered sale-agreement price is recorded for Avhad Homestead in the MahaRERA project file.
Not available
This is what the record does not contain, not a value of zero.
Source · MahaRERA project file · checked 24 October 2026
What the filings record, home by home
Read from MahaRERA on 24 October 2026
MahaRERA publishes, home by home, what this promoter filed: which homes are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for sold or booked entries the filed agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific home. On this project 2 homes carry one, and Every home on the filing is recorded sold or booked. Since we started watching this ledger, 2 homes have moved out of the unsold list, most recently on 24 October 2026.
A filed consideration is the amount the promoter reported for one home. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the home is available to you today.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+12 and 24 homes are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avhad Homestead | 1 | G+12 | 24 | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 24 residential.
Complaints
No buyer complaints were on this project's MahaRERA record at the time of reading.
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 16 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 6 “Closed”; 10 “Ongoing”. These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your home. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judicial Magistrate Of The First Class, Shindewadi | 9448 | 2025 | Closed Filed description: A complaint was filed for the removal of building materials from the premises under Section 375(a). A fine of ₹2,000/- has been paid before the Court, and the matter has been disposed of. |
| Judicial Magistrate Of The First Class, Shindewadi | 9447 | 2025 | Closed Filed description: A complaint was filed under Sections 381 and 471 of the MMC Act for failure to comply with the requisition to fill in pools, etc., which constituted a nuisance. The accused has paid a fine of ₹2,000/- before the Court, and the matter has been disposed of. |
| Judicial Magistrate Of The First Class, Shindewadi | 9446 | 2025 | Closed Filed description: A complaint was filed under Sections 381 and 471 of the MMC Act for failure to comply with the requisition to fill in pools, etc., which constituted a nuisance. The accused has paid a fine of ₹2,000/- before the Court, and the matter has been disposed of. |
| Judicial Magistrate Of The First Class, Shindewadi | 5680 | 2025 | Closed Filed description: A complaint was filed under Sections 381 and 471 of the MMC Act for failure to comply with the requisition to fill in pools, etc., which constituted a nuisance. The accused has paid a fine of ₹2,000/- before the Court, and the matter has been disposed of. |
| City Civil Court, Mumbai | 102668 | 2022 | Ongoing Filed description: The plaintiff, Smt. Pranoti Pradeep Bhatkar, has filed a suit against her siblings and developers to claim her 1/5th ancestral share in two Mahim rooms currently undergoing redevelopment. She asserts that her brothers wrongfully withheld her share of a Rs. 9 Lakhs transit rent payout and are attempting to exclude her from the future permanent alternate accommodation agreements. Consequently, she is seeking a formal court declaration of her share and an injunction to block the developers from executing agreements or paying future rent without her written consent. |
| City Civil Ourt, Mumbai | 100591 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: Four members and occupiers of a Co-operative Housing Society have filed a suit against their society and Hrub Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., alleging that the building redevelopment process and the resulting Development Agreement were executed high-handedly without proper procedures, transparency, or statutory guidelines. Consequently, the plaintiffs are seeking a court order to rectify the heavily one-sided agreement, alongside a formal declaration of their rights and an injunction to halt further execution of the project until the members; interests are fully protected. |
| City Civil Court, Mumbai | 102847 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: Wasim Trading Company, the owner and occupier of Closed Garage No. 3 in Homestead Premises Co-op Society Ltd since 1976, has filed a short cause suit in the Bombay City Civil Court. The plaintiff alleges that they were completely excluded and un-notified by the society regarding its upcoming re-development. Consequently, the plaintiff is seeking a court declaration and injunction to compel the appointed developer, Hrub Infra Project Ltd, to execute a development agreement providing them with all rightful re-development and alternate accommodation benefits. |
| City Civil Court, Mumbai | 101021 | 2026 | Ongoing Filed description: This Notice of Motion has been filed in Suit No. 2847 of 2025 by Wasim Trading Company against the Defendants to obtain a temporary injunction restraining them, their partners, agents, servants, and representatives from dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit premises—Closed Garage No. 3 at Homestead Premises Co-op Society Ltd, Mahim, Mumbai—without due process of law, and to further restrain them from obstructing the plaintiffs right of access to the premises until the final disposal of the suit. |
| Rera Authority | CC12601223 | 2026 | Ongoing Filed description: The allottees booked Flat No. 309 in the project known as “PRESCON MIDTOWN BAY” and paid an amount exceeding 10% of the total consideration for the said flat. Despite having received more than 10% of the total consideration without executing an Agreement for Sale, the promoter issued demand letters seeking amounts in excess of the statutory limit. Consequently, the allottees have initiated proceedings seeking a refund of the booking amount of Rs. 17,85,777/-, together with interest. They have also sought an order restraining the promoter from terminating the allotment and from raising any further demand exceeding 10% of the total consideration amount. |
| Rera Authority | CC12601232 | 2026 | Ongoing Filed description: The allottees booked Flat No. 310 in the project known as “PRESCON MIDTOWN BAY” and paid an amount exceeding 10% of the total consideration for the said flat. Despite having received more than 10% of the total consideration without executing an Agreement for Sale, the promoter issued demand letters seeking amounts in excess of the statutory limit. Consequently, the allottees have initiated proceedings seeking a refund of the booking amount of Rs. 16,67,760/-, together with interest. They have also sought an order restraining the promoter from terminating the allotment and from raising any further demand exceeding 10% of the total consideration amount. |
| Rera Authority | CC12400969 | 2024 | Ongoing Filed description: Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 booked Flat No. 1607 on the 16th Floor in the project “Midtown Bay”. Pursuant to the execution and registration of the Agreement for Sale with the Respondents on 5 June 2023, the Complainants issued a demand notice for payment of Rs. 24,15,328/-. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 neither replied to the said demand notice nor complied with the requisitions contained therein. Accordingly, the Complainants pray that this Hon’ble Authority be pleased to declare that the Agreement for Sale dated 26 March 2022 executed in favour of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 stands validly terminated; direct Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to execute a Deed of Cancellation in respect of the said flat; and further declare that Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have no right, title, or interest in the said flat. |
| Rera Authority | CC12400969/APPL/AM/1 | 2024 | Ongoing Filed description: The complainant’s advocate inadvertently mentioned the company’s name as “Rising Star Impex Pvt. Ltd.” instead of “Rising Sun Impex Pvt. Ltd.” Accordingly, the present application has been filed seeking correction of the said error. |
| Bombay High Court | AOST No. 6000 of 2026 | 2026 | Closed Filed description: The present Appeal challenges the impugned order dated 25/02/2026 passed by the Ld. City Civil Court Bombay (Court 06, Addl. Sessions Judge), whereby the Ld. Court arbitrarily and mechanically rejected the ad-interim relief sought in Notice of Motion No. 1147 of 2026 in L.C. Suit No. 450 of 2026, without considering the overwhelming scientific evidence of five independent BMC-empanelled structural auditors classifying the suit building as 'C-2B' (repairable). |
| Bombay High Court | CRR No. 8 of 2026 | 2026 | Closed Filed description: The Court Receiver has confirmed compliance with the order dated 26.03.2026 and seeks directions regarding the custody of Flat No. 601, along with permission to deduct rep08ort costs of ₹5,000 from the suit account. |
| Bombay High Court | IAST No. 6001 of 2026 | 2026 | Ongoing Filed description: The Appellants seek a stay on the operation and implementation of the Technical Advisory committee Order dated 21.11.2025, the Notice under Section 354 of the MMC Act, and the consequential communications/notices dated 10.12.2025, 02.01.2026 and 19.01.2026 issued by the BMC, pending the hearing and final disposal of the Appeal from Order. |
| Bombay High Court | CRR No. 9 of 2026 | 2026 | Ongoing Filed description: The Court Receiver seeks discharge from the matter without passing accounts, subject to payment of the Receiver's costs, charges and expenses. The Court Receiver also seeks permission to deduct ₹5,000 towards the report costs from the balance lying in the suit account. |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at Mahim, F.P. No. 703, C.S. No. 6/1176, Mumbai City, Mumbai City, 400016. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by Adjoining plot bearing F.P. No. 702, to the south by Adjoining plot bearing F.P. No. 704, to the east by Adjoining plot bearing F.P. No. 697 and to the west by 12.30 m wide Existing Balamiya lane . These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.