K-RERA · the public record
ELV High Garden
Bengaluru East · ELV Projects
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
02 Oct 2026
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
3.5registered acres
62.6registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for ELV High Garden
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/181122/005469
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 219 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 31,083 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 48,487 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 14,164 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~2.25 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈31,869 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 14,164 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 374 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 374 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 1 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | BBMP/Addl.Dir/JDNORTH/0064/2019-20 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 20-07-2022 | |
| Project start date | 02-10-2022 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 36 | 16% | 4,094 sqm |
| 2BHK | 160 | 73% | 12,584 sqm |
| 2.5BHK | 23 | 11% | 2,272 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELV High Garden | 13 | 219 | 374 | 43.6 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 130 official flat/unit rows vs 219 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 71 | 838.0-875.0 sqft | 335.0-405.0 sqft | 71 |
| 3 BHK | 36 | 1,185.0-1,278.0 sqft | 492.0-655.0 sqft | 36 |
| 2.5 BHK | 23 | 1,061.0-1,066.0 sqft | 449.0-518.0 sqft | 23 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELV High Garden | 130 | 838.0-1,278.0 sqft | 335.0-655.0 sqft | 130 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | ELV High Garden | 1 | 2 BHK | 842.0 sqft | 362.0 sqft | 1 |
| 102 | ELV High Garden | 1 | 2 BHK | 838.0 sqft | 335.0 sqft | 1 |
| 104 | ELV High Garden | 1 | 2 BHK | 857.0 sqft | 388.0 sqft | 1 |
| 103 | ELV High Garden | 1 | 2 BHK | 842.0 sqft | 368.0 sqft | 1 |
| 201 | ELV High Garden | 1 | 2 BHK | 842.0 sqft | 363.0 sqft | 1 |
| 202 | ELV High Garden | 1 | 2 BHK | 838.0 sqft | 335.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
⚠ 7 of 32 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the building, Urban Land Ceiling, Collaboration Agreement/Development Agreement/Joint Development Agreement/Other Agreement, Change of Land Use, District Magistrate and more.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA complaint orders (12 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUMIT SUNIL NAIKWAD vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & 3 OTHERS | Refund the amount of Rs.44,33,900/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of payment | AUTHORITY | 28/05/2024 |
| MANJU RANI NANDY vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & 3 OTHERS | Refund the amount of Rs.52,00,000/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of payment | AUTHORITY | 28/05/2024 |
| THYAGARAJ GS vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Refund the amount of Rs.41,83,800/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of payment | AUTHORITY | 14/05/2024 |
| HARIKRISHNA SURAPARAJU vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Refund the amount of Rs.36,98,700/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of payment | AUTHORITY | 14/05/2024 |
| SURESH CHANDRA SINGH GARIA vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Refund the amount of Rs.38,42,300/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of payment | AUTHORITY | 14/05/2024 |
| DEVENDRA KISHOR LOKHANDE vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Refund the amount of Rs.50,50,000/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of payment | AUTHORITY | 14/05/2024 |
| TRIVENI GOLLA vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Refund the amount of Rs.45,46,300/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of payment | AUTHORITY | 14/05/2024 |
| BIJU JACOB vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Refund the amount of Rs.53,92,400/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. and compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the Complainant | AUTHORITY | 14/05/2024 |
| SHRAVAN KUMAR CHHAPARIA vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Refund the amount of Rs.61,43,900/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of payment | AUTHORITY | 14/05/2024 |
| KONDAPI MAHESH BABU vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Refund the amount of Rs.39,74,000/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of payment | AUTHORITY | 14/05/2024 |
| PRASHANT SINGHAL & PRARTHANA GUPTA vs ELV PROJECTGS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Refund the amount of Rs.44,33,900/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of payment | AUTHORITY | 02/05/2024 |
| YUVRAJ SINGH BABRAH vs ELV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of the remaining amount + any interest (if applicable) | AUTHORITY | 02/05/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (23 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190611/0003276 11-06-2019 | Revoking the REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF PROJECT (Company) dated 22.11.2018 bearing project registration No.PRM/KA/RARA/1251/ 446/PR/18122/002144 of project | ELV Kingsland (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221010/0010082 10-10-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not undertaken- deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010276 14-11-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not undertaken- Deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010278 14-11-2022 | Despite lapse of 57 months, project not delivered - deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010283 14-11-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not Completed and undue delay in completion - deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010285 14-11-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not Completed and undue delay in completion - deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010286 14-11-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not Completed and undue delay in completion - deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010288 14-11-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not Completed and undue delay in completion - deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing5 of 5 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
5 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 17-02-2021 | NOC - BWSSB(Online).pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 02-11-2018 | NOC _ BESCOM.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 26-05-2020 | NOC _ FES2020 PDF.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 05-12-2018 | NOC _ AA.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 14-07-2018 | NOC-BSNL.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | Thippaluru Nagendra Reddy | 024594S | 2022 | Guntur, Andhra Pradesh - 516172 |
| Engineer | Sagiraju Damodhar | M-1612128 | 2018 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560016 |
| Architect | Arunkumar Deivanayagam | CA/2004/34162 | 2004 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560045 |
| Contractor | ELV Projects Private Limited | - | 2018 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560066 |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹1.27 Cr collected from buyers, ₹1.27 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 29% → 30% (+1 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 76/219 (35%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹14.22 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹21.36 Cr (1.50x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 29% to 30% across the filed QPR window.
- Across available QPR rows, escrow withdrawals are 1.50x buyer collections. Ask the builder to reconcile this against certified project costs and prior-period balances.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹53.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: RATNAKAR BANK prestige towers IFSC Code : RATN0000156 Pin Code : 560025. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 5 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 16 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 21 km |
| Electronic City | 22 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.