ELV High Garden
K-RERA · the public record
ELV Kingsland
Bengaluru East · ELV Projects
Is this the right project?
Which home should you choose?
Read the free RERA facts below. For help choosing a home or comparing a price, select a report.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Dec 2021declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
161registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.2registered acres
71.6registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for ELV Kingsland
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/181122/002144
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2021
Land area9,105 sq m (2.2 acres)
Homes registered161
Tower/wing entries2
In context
Density71.6 homes per acre
Density in context43rd percentile of 1123 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.5)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 161 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 9,105 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 161 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 04-07-2018 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A & B BLOCK | 9 | 107 | 107 | - |
| C BLOCK | 9 | 54 | 54 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 161 official flat/unit rows, matching the 161 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 125 | 775.0-874.0 sqft | 312.2-387.8 sqft | 71 (54 with 0) |
| 3BHK | 36 | 998.0-1,155.0 sqft | 396.2-498.4 sqft | 36 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A & B BLOCK | 107 | 833.0-1,155.0 sqft | 331.8-498.4 sqft | 107 |
| C BLOCK | 54 | 775.0-847.0 sqft | 312.2-378.0 sqft | 0 (54 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 - 101 | A & B BLOCK | 1 | 3BHK | 1,155.0 sqft | 462.0 sqft | 1 |
| A2 - 102 | A & B BLOCK | 1 | 2BHK | 874.0 sqft | 347.2 sqft | 1 |
| A4 - 104 | A & B BLOCK | 1 | 3BHK | 998.0 sqft | 396.2 sqft | 1 |
| A5 - 105 | A & B BLOCK | 1 | 2BHK | 833.0 sqft | 331.8 sqft | 1 |
| B1 - 101 | A & B BLOCK | 1 | 2BHK | 833.0 sqft | 331.8 sqft | 1 |
| B2 - 102 | A & B BLOCK | 1 | 2BHK | 833.0 sqft | 331.8 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
9 of 15 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 6 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2021, extended (Extension) to 30 Aug 2024 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 09 Nov 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/221109/002144) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Not identified in the document list
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Not identified in the document list
Fire NOCNot identified in the document list
Pollution control (KSPCB)Not identified in the document list
Environmental clearanceNot identified in the document list
Airport Authority height clearanceNot identified in the document list
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (27 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| SANDEEP MC vs ELV PROJECTS PVT LTD., | Refund the amount of Rs.37,91,600/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. and compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the Complainant. | AUTHORITY | 26/12/2024 |
| SHARANABASAVA vs ELV PROJECTS PVT. LTD., | Refund the amount of Rs.38,97,400/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 26/12/2024 |
| Ashish Kumar Srivastava vs ELV Projects Pvt Ltd. | Refund the amount of Rs.38,97,800/- paid along with the interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Mohan Prasad vs ELV Projects Pvt Ltd. | Refund the amount of Rs.38,97,800/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Subramani Paramasivam vs ELV Projects Pvt Ltd. | Refund the amount of Rs.45,95,000/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Amal Singh Bhaduria vs ELV Projects Pvt Ltd. | Refund the amount of Rs.38,97,800/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| ASHIMA GODHA vs ELv Projects Pvt Ltd. | Refund the amount of Rs.39,91,600/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Garima Dixit vs ELV Projects Pvt Ltd. | Refund the amount of Rs.42,01,000/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. and compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the Complainant. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| NIPUN PAL vs ELV Projects Pvt Ltd. | Refund the amount of Rs.37,91,600/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. and compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- to the Complainant. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Prakash Chandra Kotwal vs ElV Kings Land | Refund the amount of Rs.37,91,600/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Novneet Kumar vs ELV Kings Land | Refund the amount of Rs.37,91,600/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Reeta Rana vs ELV kings land | Refund the amount of Rs.42,01,000/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Shishir Kumar vs ELV Kings Land | Direct the builder/promoter to execute sale deed and hand over possession of the flat bearing no A-701 and also to pay interest on delay period till handing over the possession of the agreed flat | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Richa Agrawal vs ELV Kings Land | Allotment of flat bearing No. A-703 as assured in the MOU | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Pankaj Kumar Morya vs ELV KingsaLand | Allotment of Flat No. B-307 as assured in the MOU | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Poonam Singh Khureja vs ELV Kings Land | Allotment of flat no. A-602 as assured in the MOU dated 21.12.2017 | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| L Jaya vs ELV KINGS LAND | Refund the amount of Rs.38,97,400/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 20/01/2025 |
| SUNIL SONI vs ELV KINGSLAND | Refund the amount of Rs.37,91,600/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 19/11/2024 |
| SMT VIMAL vs ELV Projects Pvt Ltd. | REVOCATION OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF PROJECT | AUTHORITY | 18/03/2025 |
| PANKAJ KUMAR MORYA vs M/S.ELV PROJECTS PVT LTD. | Refund the amount of Rs.38,97,400/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 18/02/2025 |
| MS RICHA AGRAWAL vs M/S.ELV PROJECTS PVT LTD | Refund the amount of Rs.39,13,000/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 18/02/2025 |
| POONAM SINGH KHUREJA vs M/S.ELV PROJECTS PVT LTD | Refund the amount of Rs.42,01,000/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 18/02/2025 |
| T P Sasidharan vs ELV KINGSLAND | Refund the amount of Rs.37,91,000/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 18/02/2025 |
| Hemanth and Chaithanya vs M/S.ELV PROJECTS PVT LTD | Seeking compensation for the delayed period from May 2023 | AUTHORITY | 16/08/2025 |
| RAVI SANKAR KOPPERLA vs ELV PROJECTS PVT LTD | Please investigate and provide me financial compensation for the financial loss I am facing because of the delaying completing the project in time. | AUTHORITY | 09/05/2024 |
| TALAMANCHI VENKATA SRINIVASULU REDDY vs ELV PROJECTS PVT LTD., | Refund the amount of Rs. 39,13,000 paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| KIRTHI KURAPATI vs ELV PROJECTS PVT LTD., & ANOTHER | Refund the amount of Rs.39,13,000/- paid along with interest at 18% p.a. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (23 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190611/0003276 11-06-2019 | Revoking the REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF PROJECT (Company) dated 22.11.2018 bearing project registration No.PRM/KA/RARA/1251/ 446/PR/18122/002144 of project | ELV Kingsland | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221010/0010082 10-10-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not undertaken- deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010276 14-11-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not undertaken- Deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010278 14-11-2022 | Despite lapse of 57 months, project not delivered - deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010283 14-11-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not Completed and undue delay in completion - deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010285 14-11-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not Completed and undue delay in completion - deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010286 14-11-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not Completed and undue delay in completion - deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221114/0010288 14-11-2022 | Despite more than 4 years, the project is not Completed and undue delay in completion - deliberate inaction | ELV Kingsland | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹27.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Canara Bank Marathahalli (IFSC CNRB0000768, a/c …0017). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 1 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 1 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 7 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 15 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 15 km |
| Electronic City | 16 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 26 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.