Mantri Serenity1
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
CASTLES VISTA · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171016/000502
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 5 approved drawings and 35 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →Mantri Serenity4 spans 79,287 sq m (19.6 acres) with 580 homes across 5 towers, registered for an estimated cost of ₹229.6 crore. At 29.6 homes per acre it sits at the 8th percentile of 784 Bengaluru South projects on this register (median 77.3). Its declared completion date of 29 January 2020 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Mantri Serenity4 is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171016/000502, and the promoter has declared completion for 29 Jan 2020.
29 Jan 2020
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Mantri Serenity4 spans 79,287 sq m (19.59 acres), comprises 5 towers, registers 580 units, and is declared to cost ₹229.63 cr.
₹229.63 cr
declared project cost
19.59acres
79,287 sq m
580units
on the registration
3.25FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
Promoter record
Castles Vista is the promoter of record on 3 projects registered with K-RERA, 3 of which are past their declared completion dates on the register.
3projects
registered with K-RERA
3past declared date
on the register
Counted across Quietlist's full K-RERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · K-RERA register, all projects · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 580 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 79,287 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 1,525 total (8 open) — 2.63 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 27-04-2015 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not working | 0 | 0 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| J | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| K | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| L | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| M | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 580 official flat/unit rows, matching the 580 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-BHK+2T | 324 | 85.0-85.9 sqm | 4.6-5.3 sqm | 324 |
| 2-BHK+2T | 236 | 65.2-82.0 sqm | 3.7-4.2 sqm | 236 |
| 3-BHK+3T | 20 | 71.5-92.0 sqm | 6.8-8.2 sqm | 20 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 116 | 65.2-92.0 sqm | 3.7-7.6 sqm | 116 |
| J | 116 | 65.2-85.4 sqm | 4.1-7.9 sqm | 116 |
| K | 116 | 66.2-85.4 sqm | 4.1-8.0 sqm | 116 |
| L | 116 | 65.2-85.4 sqm | 4.1-7.9 sqm | 116 |
| M | 116 | 65.2-89.3 sqm | 4.0-8.2 sqm | 116 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-001 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 65.2 sqm | 3.8 sqm | 1 |
| I-002 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 67.1 sqm | 3.7 sqm | 1 |
| I-003 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 67.1 sqm | 3.7 sqm | 1 |
| I-004 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 65.2 sqm | 3.8 sqm | 1 |
| I-101 | I | 1 | 2-BHK+2T | 68.2 sqm | 3.7 sqm | 1 |
| I-102 | I | 1 | 3-BHK+2T | 85.9 sqm | 4.6 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
3 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 32 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 29 Jan 2020, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 29 Oct 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 24 Jun 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/200624/000502) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (27 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAMNATH S vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | Compensation in the form interest on the total consideration of Rs. 1,45,86,515.00 @ 9 % pa; for 62 months (from 01.01.2016 to 28.02.2021) Rs. 67,82,729.00. Total compensation of Rs. | AUTHORITY | 30/08/2022 |
| Radhika Ravi vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | As prayed in Facts of Complaints | AUTHORITY | 28/09/2022 |
| Komala V vs MANTRI CASTLE PRIVATE LIMITED | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Sangita Monga vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED | As sought in the facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Rudraswamy M vs MANTRI CASTLE PRIVATE LIMITED | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| DHANANJAYA vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 26/08/2022 |
| RAMALINGESWARA RAO DRONAMRAJU vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 26/08/2022 |
| ROHIT SOMANI vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD. | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 26/08/2022 |
| NIRAJ NAWANIT vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | delay compensation as per RERA Provisions | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Mr Raghushankar Mrs Usharani P vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | Delay compensation as per RERA provisions | AUTHORITY | 25/05/2023 |
| SRIDHAR C vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | As prayed in the Fact of complaint | AUTHORITY | 25/03/2024 |
| Ramkumar Ratnagiri vs CASTLES VISTA PRIVATE LIMITED | Please ask the Builder to provide permanent Electrical Supply and permanent Water Supply. | AUTHORITY | 24/11/2025 |
| BHUSHAN SALAGAR vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2022 |
| NINGANNA BIRADAR vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | Delay compensation as per section 12, 14, 18 and 19 complete relief described in the Facts of Complaint colume | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2022 |
| GURUPRASAD B S vs MANTRI SERENITY -4 | As prayed for in the Facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 22/07/2022 |
| SRIDHAR BALAKRISHNAN vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of 2x the contributed amount, PRE-EMI, Close Bank loan, and pay cost for legal expenses and mental agony | AUTHORITY | 22/06/2023 |
| SRIRAM R vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | as prayed in the facts of the complaint | AUTHORITY | 19/10/2022 |
| BHASKAR PEELETI vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 19/10/2022 |
| SRILAKSHMI vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in the facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 19/10/2022 |
| K.PUNDALIKA NAYAK vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED | (i) To return and pay a sum of Rs.94,63,990/- , (ii) To Pay a sum of Rs.12,00000/-, (iii) To pay a sum of Rs.5,00000/- (iv) Towards the costs of filing the above application and miscellaneous charges | AUTHORITY | 17/08/2023 |
| Rekha K S vs CASTLES VISTA PVT LTD | Direct the Respondent to cancel the above mentioned agreement and refund the entire amount paid by the Complainant along with interest | AUTHORITY | 15/12/2025 |
| Nilesh Pancholi vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | Delay Compensation | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2022 |
| Umesh N S vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | As prayed in the Facts of Complaints | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2022 |
| Prakash Nanjundiah vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd., | Compensation for undue delay and quick possession of booked flat. | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| Radhika Ravi vs Mantri Castles Pvt. Ltd., | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| T N Raghu Ram vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd., | As prayed in facts of complaints | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| RAJIV JANARDHANAN vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD., & ANOTHER | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 01/07/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (68 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190218/0002186 18-02-2019 | Compensation for Delay in Possession | MANTRI SERENITY5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190327/0002525 27-03-2019 | Pending PREMI and loan amount payment from builder as per buyback scheme | Mantri Serenity3 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190417/0002653 17-04-2019 | complete refund of booking amount | Mantri Serenity5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190509/0002960 09-05-2019 | Seeking for delayed compensation as per RERA | Mantri Serenity5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190607/0003252 07-06-2019 | Seeking for the delayed compensation as per RERA | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190607/0003255 07-06-2019 | Seeking for delayed compensation as per RERA Provisions from the date of Default till the date of possession | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190609/0003259 09-06-2019 | Seeking for delay compensation from the date of default till the date of possession as per RERA provisions | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190716/0003605 16-07-2019 | seeking for delay compensation from the date of default till the date of possession as per RERA rules | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Ashok Design Build Pvt Ltd., | - | NA | West of Chord Road, Mahalakshmipuram |
| Contractor | Tata Projects Ltd Urban Infrastructure-Building & Airports, | - | NA | "11th Floor. Hiranandani Knowledge Park ", Powai |
| Structural engineer | NAGESH CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Castles Vista has 3 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 3 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹39.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road, Bengaluru (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …2120). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
The nearest major job hub is ~21 km away — well outside the job hubs — this is a value/space play, not a short-commute one; budget for the drive.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 18 km |
| Electronic City | 21 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 24 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 24 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 32 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 43 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 5 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get Mantri Serenity4 approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For Mantri Serenity4, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Castles Vista.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Mantri Serenity4?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026