K-RERA · the public record
Mantri Serenity4
Bengaluru South · CASTLES VISTA
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
19.6registered acres
29.6registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Mantri Serenity4
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171016/000502
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 580 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 79,287 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 1,525 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 8 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 27-04-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not working | 0 | 0 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| J | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| K | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| L | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| M | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 580 official flat/unit rows, matching the 580 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-BHK+2T | 324 | 85.0-85.9 sqm | 4.6-5.3 sqm | 324 |
| 2-BHK+2T | 236 | 65.2-82.0 sqm | 3.7-4.2 sqm | 236 |
| 3-BHK+3T | 20 | 71.5-92.0 sqm | 6.8-8.2 sqm | 20 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 116 | 65.2-92.0 sqm | 3.7-7.6 sqm | 116 |
| J | 116 | 65.2-85.4 sqm | 4.1-7.9 sqm | 116 |
| K | 116 | 66.2-85.4 sqm | 4.1-8.0 sqm | 116 |
| L | 116 | 65.2-85.4 sqm | 4.1-7.9 sqm | 116 |
| M | 116 | 65.2-89.3 sqm | 4.0-8.2 sqm | 116 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-001 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 65.2 sqm | 3.8 sqm | 1 |
| I-002 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 67.1 sqm | 3.7 sqm | 1 |
| I-003 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 67.1 sqm | 3.7 sqm | 1 |
| I-004 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 65.2 sqm | 3.8 sqm | 1 |
| I-101 | I | 1 | 2-BHK+2T | 68.2 sqm | 3.7 sqm | 1 |
| I-102 | I | 1 | 3-BHK+2T | 85.9 sqm | 4.6 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
3 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 32 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 29 Jan 2020, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 29 Oct 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 24 Jun 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/200624/000502) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (27 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAMNATH S vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | Compensation in the form interest on the total consideration of Rs. 1,45,86,515.00 @ 9 % pa; for 62 months (from 01.01.2016 to 28.02.2021) Rs. 67,82,729.00. Total compensation of Rs. | AUTHORITY | 30/08/2022 |
| Radhika Ravi vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | As prayed in Facts of Complaints | AUTHORITY | 28/09/2022 |
| Komala V vs MANTRI CASTLE PRIVATE LIMITED | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Sangita Monga vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED | As sought in the facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Rudraswamy M vs MANTRI CASTLE PRIVATE LIMITED | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| DHANANJAYA vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 26/08/2022 |
| RAMALINGESWARA RAO DRONAMRAJU vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 26/08/2022 |
| ROHIT SOMANI vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD. | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 26/08/2022 |
| NIRAJ NAWANIT vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | delay compensation as per RERA Provisions | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Mr Raghushankar Mrs Usharani P vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | Delay compensation as per RERA provisions | AUTHORITY | 25/05/2023 |
| SRIDHAR C vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | As prayed in the Fact of complaint | AUTHORITY | 25/03/2024 |
| Ramkumar Ratnagiri vs CASTLES VISTA PRIVATE LIMITED | Please ask the Builder to provide permanent Electrical Supply and permanent Water Supply. | AUTHORITY | 24/11/2025 |
| BHUSHAN SALAGAR vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2022 |
| NINGANNA BIRADAR vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | Delay compensation as per section 12, 14, 18 and 19 complete relief described in the Facts of Complaint colume | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2022 |
| GURUPRASAD B S vs MANTRI SERENITY -4 | As prayed for in the Facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 22/07/2022 |
| SRIDHAR BALAKRISHNAN vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of 2x the contributed amount, PRE-EMI, Close Bank loan, and pay cost for legal expenses and mental agony | AUTHORITY | 22/06/2023 |
| SRIRAM R vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | as prayed in the facts of the complaint | AUTHORITY | 19/10/2022 |
| BHASKAR PEELETI vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 19/10/2022 |
| SRILAKSHMI vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in the facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 19/10/2022 |
| K.PUNDALIKA NAYAK vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED | (i) To return and pay a sum of Rs.94,63,990/- , (ii) To Pay a sum of Rs.12,00000/-, (iii) To pay a sum of Rs.5,00000/- (iv) Towards the costs of filing the above application and miscellaneous charges | AUTHORITY | 17/08/2023 |
| Rekha K S vs CASTLES VISTA PVT LTD | Direct the Respondent to cancel the above mentioned agreement and refund the entire amount paid by the Complainant along with interest | AUTHORITY | 15/12/2025 |
| Nilesh Pancholi vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | Delay Compensation | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2022 |
| Umesh N S vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | As prayed in the Facts of Complaints | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2022 |
| Prakash Nanjundiah vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd., | Compensation for undue delay and quick possession of booked flat. | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| Radhika Ravi vs Mantri Castles Pvt. Ltd., | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| T N Raghu Ram vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd., | As prayed in facts of complaints | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| RAJIV JANARDHANAN vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD., & ANOTHER | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 01/07/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (68 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190218/0002186 18-02-2019 | Compensation for Delay in Possession | MANTRI SERENITY5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190327/0002525 27-03-2019 | Pending PREMI and loan amount payment from builder as per buyback scheme | Mantri Serenity3 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190417/0002653 17-04-2019 | complete refund of booking amount | Mantri Serenity5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190509/0002960 09-05-2019 | Seeking for delayed compensation as per RERA | Mantri Serenity5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190607/0003252 07-06-2019 | Seeking for the delayed compensation as per RERA | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190607/0003255 07-06-2019 | Seeking for delayed compensation as per RERA Provisions from the date of Default till the date of possession | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190609/0003259 09-06-2019 | Seeking for delay compensation from the date of default till the date of possession as per RERA provisions | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190716/0003605 16-07-2019 | seeking for delay compensation from the date of default till the date of possession as per RERA rules | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Ashok Design Build Pvt Ltd., | - | NA | West of Chord Road, Mahalakshmipuram |
| Contractor | Tata Projects Ltd Urban Infrastructure-Building & Airports, | - | NA | "11th Floor. Hiranandani Knowledge Park ", Powai |
| Structural engineer | NAGESH CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingCastles Vista has 3 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 3 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹39.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road, Bengaluru (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …2120). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 21 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 18 km |
| Electronic City | 21 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 24 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 24 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 32 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 43 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.