K-RERA · the public record
Mantri Serenity5
Bengaluru South · CASTLES VISTA
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
19.6registered acres
28.6registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Mantri Serenity5
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171019/000504
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 560 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 79,287 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 1,471 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 17 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 27-04-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not working | 0 | 0 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 27 | 112 | 295 | - |
| O | 27 | 112 | 294 | - |
| P | 27 | 112 | 294 | - |
| Q | 27 | 112 | 294 | - |
| R | 27 | 112 | 294 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 560 official flat/unit rows, matching the 560 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-BHK+3T | 313 | 102.7-119.6 sqm | 6.5-7.2 sqm | 313 |
| 2-BHK+2T | 227 | 77.2-87.5 sqm | 4.8-5.5 sqm | 227 |
| 3-BHK+4T | 12 | 106.5-120.0 sqm | 9.7-10.6 sqm | 12 |
| 3-BHK+2T | 8 | 91.8 sqm | 9.1-9.4 sqm | 8 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 112 | 83.9-120.0 sqm | 5.2-10.6 sqm | 112 |
| O | 112 | 77.2-106.5 sqm | 4.9-9.7 sqm | 112 |
| P | 112 | 77.2-106.5 sqm | 4.8-9.7 sqm | 112 |
| Q | 112 | 77.2-106.5 sqm | 4.9-9.7 sqm | 112 |
| R | 112 | 83.9-120.0 sqm | 5.2-10.6 sqm | 112 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-001 | N | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 83.9 sqm | 5.3 sqm | 1 |
| N-002 | N | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 85.4 sqm | 5.2 sqm | 1 |
| N-003 | N | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 85.4 sqm | 5.2 sqm | 1 |
| N-004 | N | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 83.9 sqm | 5.3 sqm | 1 |
| N-101 | N | 1 | 2-BHK+2T | 87.4 sqm | 5.3 sqm | 1 |
| N-102 | N | 1 | 3-BHK+3T | 119.5 sqm | 7.1 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
3 of 34 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 31 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 29 Jan 2020, extended (Extension) to 31 Dec 2022 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 24 Jun 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/200624/000504) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (24 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jagalur Thippeswamy Ravi vs Mantri Serenity5 | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Tirupati Rao K vs Mantri Serenity5 | As prayed in the facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Sham Sunder U N vs Mantri Serenity5 | As prayed in the facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Murthy Ranjit Murthy vs Mantri Serenity5 | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Suresh Krishnan vs Mantri Serenity5 | Delay compensation and possession of Apartment with all amenities and Occupancy Certificate, as per section 12 14 18 & 19. detail relief provided in the Facts of Complaint due to lack of space | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| NEELAM CHOUHAN & GOVIND RAJAN vs CASTLES VISTA PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund Amount at the earliest | AUTHORITY | 25/10/2024 |
| G Kannan vs Mantri Serenity5 | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 25/07/2022 |
| SHEKAR KHAWAS vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Case | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2022 |
| SATISH GOPINATH vs MAHAVEER CYGNET | Refund of 2x amount, PRE-EMI and Closure of Bank Loan | AUTHORITY | 20/12/2023 |
| Bhargava Huchurao vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | As prayed in the Fact of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 18/10/2022 |
| B K Srinivas Murthy vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 18/10/2022 |
| SATISH GOPINATH vs MANTRI SERENITY 5 | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2024 |
| Santosh Patiil vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | Possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 16/04/2025 |
| SHAMASUNDAR T K vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | Compensation requested as per the RERA guidelines. | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| Sandesh V vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| Sanjeev Sreedharan vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| S Keshava Murthy vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| Sharath Chandra Vedantam vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | as prayed in the facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| DILIP KUMAR RATHOD vs MANTRI SERENITY 5 | Refund of 2x amount, Pre-Eemi and closure of bank loan | AUTHORITY | 12/07/2023 |
| MRS. MALA RAMACHANDRA & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER | Direct the Respondents to pay the Complainants a Total amount of Rs. 66,22,876/- along with 18% interest per annum from date of complaint till date of realisation of entire amount in full obligations | AUTHORITY | 08/01/2024 |
| INDI VIVEKANAND vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund of 2x the amount, PRE-EMI and close bank loan | AUTHORITY | 03/08/2023 |
| indi vivekanand vs mantri serenity 5 | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/08/2023 |
| VISHVEKUMAR SOOD & VINEETA SOOD vs MANTRI SERENITY 5 | Completion and handover of our flat to us and pay compensation for the delay. | AUTHORITY | 02/09/2022 |
| Shanthaiah H C vs Mantri Serenity5 | I request this Hon'ble Authority to direct the respondent to complete and handover the possession by receiving balance sale consideration or refund the amount paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 01/09/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (68 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190218/0002186 18-02-2019 | Compensation for Delay in Possession | MANTRI SERENITY5 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190327/0002525 27-03-2019 | Pending PREMI and loan amount payment from builder as per buyback scheme | Mantri Serenity3 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190417/0002653 17-04-2019 | complete refund of booking amount | Mantri Serenity5 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190509/0002960 09-05-2019 | Seeking for delayed compensation as per RERA | Mantri Serenity5 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190607/0003252 07-06-2019 | Seeking for the delayed compensation as per RERA | Mantri Serenity4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190607/0003255 07-06-2019 | Seeking for delayed compensation as per RERA Provisions from the date of Default till the date of possession | Mantri Serenity4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190609/0003259 09-06-2019 | Seeking for delay compensation from the date of default till the date of possession as per RERA provisions | Mantri Serenity4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190716/0003605 16-07-2019 | seeking for delay compensation from the date of default till the date of possession as per RERA rules | Mantri Serenity4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Ashok Design Build Pvt Ltd., | - | NA | West of Chord Road, Mahalakshmipuram |
| Contractor | Tata Projects Ltd Urban Infrastructure-Building & Airports, | - | NA | "11th Floor. Hiranandani Knowledge Park ", Powai |
| Structural engineer | NAGESH CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingCastles Vista has 3 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 3 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹47.3 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road, Bengaluru (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …2156). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 21 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 18 km |
| Electronic City | 21 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 24 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 24 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 32 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 43 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.