K-RERA · the public record
Provident Equinox 3
Bengaluru South · Provident Housing
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q3 2025
declared completion
31 Mar 2028
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.0registered acres
193.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Provident Equinox 3
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/180724/006944
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 384 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 25,809 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 61,383 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 8,032 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~6.07 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈48,727 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 8,032 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 384 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 241 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 422 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | BAAPRA/NM/AS/AA-3/TS-2/D/07/2024-25 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 13-06-2024 | |
| Project start date | 01-10-2024 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK+2T(CORNER) | 72 | 19% | 71 sqm |
| 3BHK+2T | 120 | 31% | 71 sqm |
| 2BHK+2T | 48 | 12% | 57 sqm |
| 2BHK+2T(CORNER) | 144 | 38% | 57 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower G | 12 | 96 | 96 | 39.95 m |
| Tower H | 12 | 96 | 96 | 39.95 m |
| Tower J | 12 | 96 | 96 | 39.95 m |
| Tower K | 12 | 96 | 96 | 39.95 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 384 official flat/unit rows, matching the 384 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 192 | 57.9-71.8 sqm | 29.1-35.6 sqm | 192 |
| 3 BHK | 192 | 57.9-71.8 sqm | 29.1-35.6 sqm | 192 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower G | 96 | 57.9-71.8 sqm | 29.1-35.6 sqm | 96 |
| Tower H | 96 | 57.9-71.8 sqm | 29.1-35.6 sqm | 96 |
| Tower J | 96 | 57.9-71.8 sqm | 29.1-35.6 sqm | 96 |
| Tower K | 96 | 57.9-71.8 sqm | 29.1-35.6 sqm | 96 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Tower G | 1 | 3 BHK | 71.8 sqm | 35.6 sqm | 1 |
| 102 | Tower G | 1 | 3 BHK | 71.8 sqm | 35.6 sqm | 1 |
| 103 | Tower G | 1 | 2 BHK | 57.9 sqm | 29.1 sqm | 1 |
| 104 | Tower G | 1 | 2 BHK | 57.9 sqm | 29.1 sqm | 1 |
| 105 | Tower G | 1 | 3 BHK | 71.8 sqm | 35.6 sqm | 1 |
| 106 | Tower G | 1 | 3 BHK | 71.8 sqm | 35.6 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
21 of 48 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 27 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA complaint orders (1 complaint against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| KESHAVA G vs PROVIDENT EQUINOX | I request RERA to direct the respondent to refund my booking amount of one Lakh rupees | AUTHORITY | 06/06/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (11 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190521/0003077 21-05-2019 | Company is not able to keep the promises and not providing refunds | Provident Skyworth Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190522/0003125 22-05-2019 | INTEREST PAYMENT COMPENSATION FOR DELAY IN POSSESSION | Provident Skyworth Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190723/0002685 23-07-2019 | The flat has not been completed within stipulated time as per the agreement | Provident Skyworth Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190809/0003859 09-08-2019 | Return of amount and compensation | Provident Skyworth Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200311/0005691 11-03-2020 | Non completion of project in time hence asking for refund | Provident Skyworth Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/201202/0007206 02-12-2020 | Builder is mislead on completion date and not providing compensation | Provident Skyworth Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210824/0008266 24-08-2021 | Delay Compensation and Damages | Provident Skyworth Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210925/0008376 25-09-2021 | Refund of booking amount | Provident Skyworth Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing10 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | Muniyal Padmanabha Bhat | 025305 | 2017 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560093 |
| Engineer | Dhruvaraja Iyengar H N | BCCL/BL3.6/SE-0196/22-23 | 2020 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560004 |
| Architect | Venkataramanan Associates | CA/86/10034 | 2010 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560025 |
| Contractor | Kalpataru Project international limited | - | 2020 | Gandhinagar, Gujarat - 382028 |
Builder track record
RERA filingProvident has 17 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Provident Housing”) (average reported construction progress 24%). 5 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2025-Q3): ₹24.08 Cr collected from buyers, ₹16.91 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 17% → 17% (+0 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 357/384 (93%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹24.08 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹16.91 Cr (0.70x collections) |
- The builder has drawn 0.70x of buyer collections from escrow (about 70% of the ₹24 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹38.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank Ulsoor Road Branch IFSC Code : ICIC0003904 Pin Code : 560042. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 21 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 18 km |
| Electronic City | 21 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 24 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 24 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 32 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 43 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.