Shriram 107 Southeast - Phase 2
K-RERA · the public record
SHRIRAM 107 SOUTHEAST
Anekal · Shriprop Living Space
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
19 Oct 2023declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
634registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
APARTMENTS
634
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
18.1registered acres
35.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for SHRIRAM 107 SOUTHEAST
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/181122/002156
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion19 October 2023
Land area73,349 sq m (18.1 acres)
Homes registered634
Tower/wing entries7
Unit mix634 × APARTMENTS
In context
Density35 homes per acre
Density in context20th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 634 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 27,819 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 73,349 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~0.56 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈41,112 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 73,349 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 7 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 634 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 230 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 04-10-2018 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| APARTMENTS | 634 | 100% | 27,819 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 14 | 89 | 89 | - |
| 16 | 14 | 89 | 89 | - |
| 17 | 14 | 118 | 118 | - |
| 18 | 13 | 83 | 83 | - |
| 19 | 13 | 83 | 83 | - |
| 20 | 13 | 83 | 83 | - |
| 21 | 14 | 89 | 89 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 634 official flat/unit rows, matching the 634 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 634 | 42.8-46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 634 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 118 | 42.8-46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 118 |
| 15 | 89 | 42.8-46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 89 |
| 16 | 89 | 42.8-46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 89 |
| 21 | 89 | 42.8-46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 89 |
| 18 | 83 | 42.8-46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 83 |
| 19 | 83 | 42.8-46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 83 |
| 20 | 83 | 42.8-46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 83 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.00.01 | 15 | 0 | 2BHK | 46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 15.00.02 | 15 | 0 | 2BHK | 46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 15.00.04 | 15 | 0 | 2BHK | 42.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 15.00.05 | 15 | 0 | 2BHK | 42.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 15.00.06 | 15 | 0 | 2BHK | 42.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 15.01.01 | 15 | 1 | 2BHK | 46.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
1 of 24 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 23 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 19 Oct 2023, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 19 Jul 2025 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 17 May 2024 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/240517/002156) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Document listed: BESCOM
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Not identified in the document list
Fire NOCDocument listed: Fire Force Department
Pollution control (KSPCB)Document listed: KSPCB
Environmental clearanceDocument listed: SEIAA
Airport Authority height clearanceDocument listed: Airport Authority of India
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (6 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manjunatha Siddaramanna vs SHRIRAM 107 SOUTEAST | Seeking relief to not to charge interest on delayed payments as the project is already delayed and we took burden of rent and Bank EMI for delayed project tenure | AUTHORITY | 26/06/2025 |
| Amba Prasad Tiwari vs SHRIPROP LIVING SPACE PVT LTD | Please help me to get my initial deposit refund based on cancellation request | AUTHORITY | 20/09/2023 |
| Tulika Agrawal vs SHRIPROP LIVING SPACE PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of Rs.266333/- (two lacs sixty six thousand three hundred thirty three) paid to builder. | AUTHORITY | 18/10/2022 |
| auqib jeelain malik vs M/S.SHRIPROP LIVING SPACE PVT LTD | rupees 400000lakh towards delay period intrest and breach of sale agreement | AUTHORITY | 16/08/2025 |
| Radhakrishnan Puthiyapurayil vs SHRIPROP LIVING SPACE PRIVATE LIMITED | Requesting to help refund of Rs.50000 from the Builder | AUTHORITY | 06/06/2023 |
| Ravi Kumar Mishra vs Shriram 107 South East | Refund of my booking amount | AUTHORITY | 03/12/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (7 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/191106/0004338 06-11-2019 | Refund of amount after booking cancellation | SHRIRAM 107 SOUTHEAST | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200813/0006019 13-08-2020 | Refund of Rs.266333/- (two lacs sixty six thousand three hundred thirty three) paid to builder. | SHRIRAM 107 SOUTHEAST | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/200927/0006685 27-09-2020 | Based on wrong advertisement of Project at the time of sales Asked for Cancellation and refund amount But Cancellation request has never been accepted | SHRIRAM 107 SOUTHEAST | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220118/0008824 18-01-2022 | Request for Refund of Booking Amount | SHRIRAM 107 SOUTHEAST - PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220206/0008968 06-02-2022 | False Advertisement and Misleading by Shriram Properties Pvt ltd | SHRIRAM 107 SOUTHEAST - PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220401/0009305 01-04-2022 | Refund booking amount | SHRIRAM 107SOUTHEAST - PHASE 3 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/221220/0010491 20-12-2022 | BOOKING AMOUNT OF RS.50000 NOT REFUNDING | SHRIRAM 107 SOUTHEAST | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Builder track record
RERA filingShriprop Living has 2 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 72%). 0 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹22.3 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: STATE BANK OF INDIA COMMERCIAL BRANCH (IFSC SBIN0004196, a/c …1399). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 13 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 13 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 20 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 22 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 28 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 33 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 48 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.