G R Floret
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Windsor Edifices · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171214/001023
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 5 approved drawings and 27 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →WINDSOR TROIKA spans 19,698 sq m (4.9 acres) with 292 registered homes across three towers, offering a mix of 2BHK, 3BHK, and 4BHK units, and has an estimated project cost of ₹80.0 crore. At 60 homes per acre it sits at the 26th percentile of 784 Bengaluru South projects on this register (median 77.3). Its declared completion date of 30 June 2019 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Windsor Troika is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171214/001023, and the promoter has declared completion for 30 Jun 2019.
30 Jun 2019
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Windsor Troika spans 19,698 sq m (4.87 acres), comprises 3 towers, registers 292 units, and is declared to cost ₹80 cr.
₹80 cr
declared project cost
4.87acres
19,698 sq m
292units
on the registration
2.29FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 292 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 32,878 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 19,698 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.29 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 465 total (29 open) — 1.59 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 01-12-2014 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK 3BHK & 4BHK | 286 | 100% | 32,878 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A - BLOCK | 18 | 141 | 38 | - |
| B - BLOCK | 18 | 145 | 33 | - |
| C - BLOCK | 5 | 6 | 394 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 292 official flat/unit rows, matching the 292 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 133 | 951.6-1,942.6 sqft | 602.0-1,229.0 sqft | 133 |
| 3BHK | 131 | 1,175.0-1,902.9 sqft | 742.0-1,204.0 sqft | 131 |
| 4BHK | 22 | 1,816.1-2,261.5 sqft | 1,200.0-1,431.0 sqft | 22 |
| CAR PARKING | 4 | 3,295.2-3,325.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 394 |
| CLUBHOUSE | 2 | 931.4-1,743.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (2 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B - BLOCK | 145 | 951.6-2,261.5 sqft | 602.0-1,431.0 sqft | 145 |
| A - BLOCK | 141 | 951.6-2,261.5 sqft | 602.0-1,431.0 sqft | 141 |
| C - BLOCK | 6 | 931.4-3,325.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 394 (2 with 0) |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | A - BLOCK | 1 | 2BHK | 951.6 sqft | 602.0 sqft | 1 |
| 103 | A - BLOCK | 1 | 3BHK | 1,175.0 sqft | 742.0 sqft | 1 |
| 105 | A - BLOCK | 1 | 2BHK | 1,009.4 sqft | 639.0 sqft | 1 |
| 202 | A - BLOCK | 2 | 2BHK | 951.6 sqft | 602.0 sqft | 1 |
| 203 | A - BLOCK | 2 | 3BHK | 1,175.0 sqft | 742.0 sqft | 1 |
| 205 | A - BLOCK | 2 | 2BHK | 1,009.4 sqft | 639.0 sqft | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 27 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Jun 2019, extended (Extension) to 30 Sep 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 20 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/220620/001023) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (57 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Akash Nishant vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of the 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as cost. | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| AMITA SARKAR vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Vishwas Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Tapan Kumar Pattanaik vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Sagar Bhikamchand Gugaliya vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| John Mathew vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Rahul Khandewal vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Sanket Tendulkar vs Windsor Troika | Allot the covered car parking space as mentioned in the registered Sale Deed, without any additional charges along with NOC | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| SUDHIR GANGADHAR vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED | to direct the respondent for entire refund with profits, amounting to 21,14,500/- plus interest at 18% from the date of receiving amount, to the complainant, morefully prayed in the attachment | AUTHORITY | 29/04/2023 |
| MRS SUSHREE SANGITA DALAI vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED | Builder shall be directed to hand over possession of my Flat No.1401-A without any further payment and also directed to pay compensation for delay in giving possession. | AUTHORITY | 29/04/2023 |
| Vrindavan Singh Yadav vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Vikesh B Narielwala vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Ekta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Anirudh Sareen vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Apurv Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space in multilevel car park per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Umesh Kumar Syal vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Darryl Dennis Dias vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (two) covered car parking space with EV charging points as per sale deed 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs.11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Aravind Konidala vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Ashish Rawat vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Maheswar Panda vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Pranesh R Gajendragad vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Darryl Dennis Dias vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space with EV charging point as per sale deed 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs.11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sreevathsa KS vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Shantanu K Sahay vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Shankar Kumar vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Saurav Guha vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sanjeev Ranjan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sandip Ghosh vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Roni S Mascarenhas vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Avinchandra vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Praveen Kumar Kothapalli vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Dayalan Krishnamurthy vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Deepak Kumar vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Dwitiya Devidutta Nayak vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Maya Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Nidhi Lalwani vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Naveena Chandra H J vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| S V Rakesh vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Ranjeeta Shome vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 3 (Three) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Rohan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Rohit Vermani vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sunny Sharma vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Kotipalli VSVS Gowri Prasad vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Jasmine Johnbosco vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Shilpa Ganapathi vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sathish Ranjan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Grishma Nadig vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Jagdeesh V vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sumit Sengar vs Windsor Troika | Refund of an Amount of Rs. 13,88,330/- long with Applicable Interest and the cost of litigation. | AUTHORITY | 21/08/2025 |
| Pawan Kumar vs Windsor Troika | direct the respondent to refund the amont of Rs.6,94,330 alongwith 18% interest | AUTHORITY | 21/08/2025 |
| Anil Ramkumar Sharma vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| SELVI MICHAEL vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Sunil Kumar vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Hiralal Sahoo vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Ritika Singodia vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Amrendra Bhushan vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Vishal Pishe vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (5 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/211215/0008727 15-12-2021 | Complainant against Windsor Edifices Pvt Ltd | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211230/0008758 30-12-2021 | Subjected to clear violation of Sections 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 and 14 and the respondents have duly failed to discharge its statutory obligation . | WINDSOR TROIKA:::PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171214/001023 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220430/0009405 30-04-2022 | Application under section 31 of the RERA for Refund | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220504/0009411 04-05-2022 | Complaint under Section 31 of RERA | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220713/0009741 13-07-2022 | Despite receiving entire Sale Consideration and loading charges and execution of Conveyance deed Builder fraudulently not giving Possession. | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | V T ANAND | - | 2004 | 324 nandini 15th cross, palace upper orchards |
| Structural engineer | Munish Sharma | - | - | - |
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹27.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC RICHMOND ROAD (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …0322). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload from Aug 2017.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
The nearest major job hub is ~5 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 11 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 18 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 20 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 38 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 5 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get WINDSOR TROIKA approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For WINDSOR TROIKA, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Windsor Edifices.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Windsor Troika?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026