MahaRERA · the public record
WHITE CITY PHASE 2 WING B
KANDIVALI · RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Empire Solitaire
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Dosti Pine · earlier comprehensive example
North-east at the door. Or in the living room.
E2506 has north-east-facing living space and a south-west entrance. E3001 reverses those directions and sits on the top floor. The report compares named flats, refuge adjacency and shared gardens using the March 2026 filing, read on 17 September 2026; this is not live availability.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Dosti Pine sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 18 Jul 2026RERA details for WHITE CITY PHASE 2 WING B
MahaRERA · P51800008324
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
WHITE CITY PHASE 2 WING B is registered with MahaRERA as P51800008324 and the promoter has declared completion for 28 Feb 2023.
28 Feb 2023
declared completion
44months past
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 18 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | P51800008324 |
| Registered on | 18 Aug 2017 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 28 Feb 2023 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | about 44 months past the declared date |
Promoter record
What else is this promoter on record for?
RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED is the promoter of record on 2 projects registered with MahaRERA.
2projects
registered with MahaRERA
Counted across Quietlist's full MahaRERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · MahaRERA register, all projects · read 18 Jul 2026
Construction
How much construction cost has been reported?
In WHITE CITY PHASE 2 WING B, ₹91.46 Cr of a declared ₹137.34 Cr estimated project cost is reported as incurred, about 66.6%, as at the last certified filing with MahaRERA.
66.6%
₹91.46 Cr
of ₹137.34 Cr declared cost
Cost incurred as last certified to MahaRERA. It is a financial measure, not a survey of site work, and it can lag on-site reality between filings.
Source · MahaRERA quarterly progress filing · read 18 Jul 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In WHITE CITY PHASE 2 WING B, 184 of 186 homes filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked (169 with registered agreements and 15 booked), about 99%, and 2 are filed as unsold.
99%sold or booked
184 of 186 homes
₹418.50 Cr
committed by buyers
Counts and agreement value as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability. Of that agreement value, ₹387.22 Cr (about 93%) is recorded as collected and ₹31.27 Cr as receivable.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 18 Jul 2026
Filed agreement values: across 184 sold or booked entries with usable filed values and areas, the effective carpet rate is ₹16,848/sqft, with eight in ten falling between ₹14,570 and ₹23,958 — computed from the agreement values and carpet areas the promoter filed, not broker quotes.
The units recorded as unsold on the filing. The reckoner value is the government's ready-reckoner assessment the promoter filed against that unit, the figure stamp duty is charged on. It is not a price anyone paid, not an asking price, and not a valuation of the unit.
| Floor | Unit | Carpet | Govt reckoner value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor 20 | 2010 | 871 sqft (80.9411 sqm) | ₹1.15 Cr |
| Floor 37 | 3710 | 871 sqft (80.9411 sqm) | ₹1.15 Cr |
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
What the filings record, home by home
Read from MahaRERA on 19 October 2026
MahaRERA publishes, home by home, what this promoter filed: which homes are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for sold or booked entries the filed agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific home. On this project 184 homes carry one, and 2 of the 186 are recorded unsold.
Here is one home filed as unsold, beside the amounts filed for comparable homes:
| Home | Carpet | Filed comparison | Based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 871 sqft | Rs 1.44 cr typical, over Rs 1.25 cr to Rs 2.36 cr 1 unusually low or high filed amount is included in this range. Check the individual entries before using it to discuss a price. | 25 filed · number pattern + area (within 2%), same building |
A filed consideration is the amount the promoter reported for one home. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the home is available to you today. Only one observation of this ledger so far: no change can be reported yet. This observation is an archived copy whose time is the moment the file was written, not a portal fetch time.
In WHITE CITY PHASE 2 WING B, every one of the 2 unsold homes has filed sales to compare with. The Sales Report gives each of them its own row — the filed agreements behind its comparison listed in full, the government reckoner value the promoter filed against it, and mortgage status where the filing supplies it. Missing mortgage information is not confirmation that a unit is free of a mortgage. Built from the filing itself, sent by email.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+45 and 186 homes are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHITE CITY PHASE 2 WING B | 1 | G+45 | 186 | 29 Dec 2020 |
Unit mix on the filing: 186 residential.
Legal and disputes
What disputes are disclosed?
34 complaints are on the MahaRERA record for WHITE CITY PHASE 2 WING B, with orders passed in 34 of them.
34complaints
34with an order
Counts as disclosed in the project record.
Source · MahaRERA project disclosures · read 18 Jul 2026
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC006000000110775 | 11/11/2019 | Gautam Harshe vs Rajesh Real estate developers pvt ltd. | order passed |
| CC006000000110788 | 15/09/2019 | Vineet Chhabra and Kanika Chhabra vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000197119 | 02/07/2021 | Tarang Goyal vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. | order passed |
| CC006000000194026 | 29/09/2020 | Satish Sharma vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000194830 | 06/11/2020 | Anand Shankar Nair and Bhavana Anand Nair vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000195703 | 10/02/2021 | Mr.Vasant Sachidanand Pandit and Mrs.Gayatri Vasant Pandit vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000195724 | 16/02/2021 | Mrs. Kavita Prabhakar and Mr. Prabhakar Varadarajan vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000195677 | 22/05/2021 | AMIT KUMAR JHA vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000195813 | 01/02/2021 | PIYUSH K PATEL vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000195815 | 01/02/2021 | KETAN DINKARRAY RAVAL vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000195898 | 09/02/2021 | UMESH KISHANCHAND LALJANI vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER PVT. LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000196282 | 08/03/2021 | Ramanik Pevekar vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Pvt Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000197890 | 05/08/2021 | Kamaljeet Singh vs VISHAL DOSHI | order passed |
| CC006000000197932 | 08/08/2021 | Mina Chandrakant Joshi vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000220988 | 06/05/2022 | Inder Singh Parihar vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000221102 | 09/05/2022 | Ketan Dinkarray Raval vs Rajesh Real Estate Developer Pvt.Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000221109 | 07/05/2022 | sanjay Nainmal Agarwal vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000221124 | 09/05/2022 | Umesh Kishanchand Laljani vs Rajesh Real Estate Developer Pvt ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000221125 | 09/05/2022 | Piyush p Patel vs Rajesh Real Estate Developer PVt. Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000251438 | 14/06/2022 | SEEMA AGARWAL vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000251439 | 14/06/2022 | BANARSILAL TIBREWAL vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000251440 | 14/06/2022 | RAVI SINGHANIA vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000251441 | 14/06/2022 | MEENADEVI SANGHAI vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000251469 | 15/06/2022 | TEJA SINGH BASSAN vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000261965 | 20/07/2022 | Prakash Kumar Rameshwar Sanghai vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000292515 | 30/08/2022 | DILIPKUMAR MEHTA vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000302977 | 10/10/2022 | DAMYANTI PALTA vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000303314 | 13/11/2022 | DR MADHUKAR SHRI KRISHNA NILMANI vs MESSERS RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000375366 | 24/04/2023 | jaise isaac vs Pratik Patel ( Director) | order passed |
| CC006000000198653 | 12/10/2021 | Bhajan Singh Choudhary vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000396979 | 07/08/2023 | RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY vs KAMALJEET SINGH | order passed |
| CC006000000397046 | 11/08/2023 | Tarang Goyal vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. | order passed |
| CC006000000479768 | 26/03/2024 | Balbir Prasad vs RAHEJA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC12503264 | 13/09/2025 | Girish NAROTTAMDAS Ved vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
Deadline Extensions
The MahaRERA completion deadline for this project has been formally extended 2 times, as recorded on the register.
| From | Extended to | Stated reason |
|---|---|---|
| as registered | 29 Jun 2020 | The reason for delay are as follows: 1. Majority of our customers were seeking 98% Home Loan Finance. The loans were sanctioned and / or under process for sanction majorly by NBFC |
| 29 Jun 2020 | 31 Aug 2022 | We Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited the promoter / developer of the Project ‘Whitecity Phase 2 Wing B’, earlier registered vide registration no. P51800008324, under th |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at KANDIVALI, AKURLI ROAD, Mumbai City, Mumbai City, 400101. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by AMENITY OPEN SPACE, to the south by AKURLI ROAD, to the east by PHASE 3 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT and to the west by RAHEJA WILLOW. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 12 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 12 km |
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 15 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 17 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 19 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 27 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 35 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.