Dynasty II
K-RERA · the public record
AMITY
· MOHTISHAM COMPLEXES
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
100%construction reportedQ4 2025 filing
19units not bookedof 107 · Q4 2025 filing
107registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
Free project details
Registration read 16 Jul 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
100%
Q3 2025
100%
Q4 2025
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q4 2025
declared completion
Not recorded
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
Registered units and project size
RESIDENTIAL
107
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
The whole registration
1.2registered acres
89.9registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for AMITY
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1257/334/PR/230522/004895
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Land area4,816 sq m (1.2 acres)
Homes registered107
Tower/wing entries1
Unit mix107 × RESIDENTIAL
In context
Density89.9 homes per acre
Density in context59th percentile of 4913 projects in this register (median 82)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 107 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 11,088 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 15,997 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 4,816 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.053 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 115 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 115 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 11 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 126 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | MANAPA/NAYOSA/PAAYO/15/2012-13 & | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 20-01-2021 | |
| Project start date | 01-12-2021 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| RESIDENTIAL | 107 | 100% | 11,177 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMITY | 19 | 107 | 115 | 53.45 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 107 official flat/unit rows, matching the 107 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK | 72 | 108.8-114.6 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 72 |
| 2 BHK | 35 | 84.1-91.6 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 35 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMITY | 107 | 84.1-114.6 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 107 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UG01 | AMITY | 1 | 3 BHK | 109.0 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 1 |
| UG02 | AMITY | 1 | 3 BHK | 108.8 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 1 |
| UG03 | AMITY | 1 | 2 BHK | 84.1 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 1 |
| UG04 | AMITY | 1 | 3 BHK | 114.1 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 1 |
| UG05 | AMITY | 1 | 3 BHK | 109.5 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 1 |
| 101 | AMITY | 2 | 3 BHK | 109.2 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
33 of 48 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 15 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 28 Feb 2025, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 28 Feb 2026 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 28 Apr 2026 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1257/334/PR/260428/004895) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (1 complaint listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/201009/0006789 09-10-2020 | Compensation | CANOPY (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing4 of 4 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
6 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 04-06-2025 | PERMANENT WATER CON ORDER COPY.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 06-03-2025 | CFO.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 03-11-2025 | Power sanction letter 1.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 29-03-2025 | Clearnace Certificate from KSFES.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | R KRISHNAN | 025927 | 2000 | Alappuzha, Kerala - 688011 |
| Engineer | N MANOHAR | BCC/BL/3.6 E/2014-15 | 1991 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560094 |
| Architect | DHARMARAJ ASSOCIATES | 0000CA/2008/42462 | 1995 | Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka - 575003 |
| Contractor | THE GUARDIAN CONSTRUCTIONS | - | 1995 | Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka - 575004 |
Builder track record
RERA filingMohtisham Complexes has 4 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 64%). 0 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹68.81 Cr collected from buyers, ₹44.11 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 100% → 100% (+0 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 88/107 (82%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹137.62 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹88.22 Cr (0.64x collections) |
- The builder has drawn 0.64x of buyer collections from escrow (about 64% of the ₹138 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹42.8 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: STATE BANK OF INDIA SME BRANCH IFSC Code : SBIN0004118 Pin Code : 575003. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 301 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 300 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 301 km |
| Electronic City | 305 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 308 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 312 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 315 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.