Casagrand Zaiden
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Casa Grande Garden City Builders · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/210928/004324
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 6 approved drawings and 22 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →Casagrand Orlena spans 4.0 acres with 296 homes registered across 2 towers, including 10 one-bedroom units. Its density of 74.1 homes per acre is the 48th percentile among 1118 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.7). Its declared completion date of 21 August 2024 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Casagrand Orlena is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/210928/004324, and the promoter has declared completion for 21 Aug 2024.
21 Aug 2024
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Casagrand Orlena spans 16,161 sq m (3.99 acres), comprises 2 towers, registers 296 units, and is declared to cost ₹81.68 cr.
₹81.68 cr
declared project cost
3.99acres
16,161 sq m
296units
on the registration
2.25FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
Promoter record
Casagrand is the promoter of record on 20 projects registered with K-RERA, 10 of which are past their declared completion dates on the register.
20projects
registered with K-RERA
10past declared date
on the register
41%
average construction reported
Counted across Quietlist's full K-RERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · K-RERA register, all projects · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 296 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 30 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 16,161 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 339 total (44 open) — 1.15 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 01-09-2021 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1BHK | 10 | 100% | 30 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building 1 | 7 | 112 | 129 | - |
| Building 2 | 7 | 184 | 210 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 296 official flat/unit rows, matching the 296 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK+3T | 150 | 87.3-100.2 sqm | 57.4-68.5 sqm | 198 |
| 2BHK+2T | 136 | 64.0-70.8 sqm | 42.6-49.1 sqm | 136 |
| 1RK+1T | 10 | 29.9-30.8 sqm | 20.2-20.7 sqm | 5 (5 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building 2 | 184 | 30.8-100.2 sqm | 20.7-68.5 sqm | 210 (5 with 0) |
| Building 1 | 112 | 29.9-100.2 sqm | 20.2-68.3 sqm | 129 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG01 | Building 1 | 0 | 1RK+1T | 29.9 sqm | 20.4 sqm | 1 |
| AG02 | Building 1 | 0 | 1RK+1T | 29.9 sqm | 20.2 sqm | 1 |
| AG03 | Building 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 96.8 sqm | 63.4 sqm | 1 |
| AG04 | Building 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 96.8 sqm | 63.6 sqm | 1 |
| AG05 | Building 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 99.8 sqm | 65.0 sqm | 1 |
| AG06 | Building 1 | 0 | 2BHK+2T | 70.4 sqm | 46.5 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
⚠ 3 of 22 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Proforma For Sale Deed, Performa of Allotment Letter, Brochure of Current Project.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 21 Aug 2024, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 21 Aug 2025 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 09 Oct 2024 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/241009/004324) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
Penalty orders on record:
| Violation | Under section | Penalty | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non Submission Of Annual Report 2021 22 | Section 4(2)(l)(D) | ₹4,421,781 | 14/12/2023 |
K-RERA complaint orders (51 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dheenadhayalan Magendran vs Casagrand Orlena | 1. Direct builder to share the revised plan and approval, 2. Direct builder to complete the project as per the agreement, 3. To Pay delay period interest for delay in delivery of the flat | AUTHORITY | 28/07/2026 |
| PRATHEEKSHITH KUNJATHUR vs Casagrand Orlena | Interest on delayed period. | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Joe Thomas vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct the builder to share the updated building plan. Provide justification for building plan change. Action against the builder for non-compliance with RERA guidelines. | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Shivaraman N vs Casagrand Orlena | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Augustine Francis vs Casagrand Orlena | direct promoter to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land documents ensure the timely delivery of the flat | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Rani Chintha vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct Builder to share revised plan, pay compensation for the changes done, handover the project after full completion as soon as possible and pay interest on delay period happened | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Annapoorani D vs Casagrand Orlena | to grant interest on delay period for handing over the physical possession of the flat to the complainant | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Puja Priya vs Casagrand Orlena | seeking for the compensation and interest on delay caused towards handing over the possession | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Mary Prakasam vs Casagrand Orlena | to pay the necessary interest towards the failure of handing over the possession within time. | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Puja Priya vs Casagrand Orlena | seeking for the compensation and interest on delay caused towards handing over the possession | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| MAZHERUNNISA BEGUM vs Casagrand Or5lena | Delayed interest under law (home loan interest 8.35% or MCLR interest rate, whichever is higher) and completion of project and handover of flat or refund entire amount along with interest till date | AUTHORITY | 24/07/2026 |
| B Prasad vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | interest on delay period in interest towards handing over possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2026 |
| Md Masood Huzaif vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | Respectfully request the Hon’ble Authority to direct the respondent to pay interest for delay in handing over possession from the promised date 21-08-2024 till actual handover under Section 18 of RER. | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2026 |
| T Satish Kumar vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | interest on delay period possession | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2026 |
| Philip John George vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | interest on delay period towards handing over possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2026 |
| Avinash Kumar vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct Promoter to share the revised plans and relevant approvals. gurantee a timeline for the delivery of the project, interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Viswanath K vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct promoter to share updated plan of apartment and clubhouse. Ensure timely delivery of flat and clubhouse as agreed in the Sale deed. Ensure promoter pay interest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Dilliraj Ramakrishna vs Casagrand Orlena | interest/compensation for the delay caused | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Vivek Srinivasan vs Casagrand Orlena | seeking compensation and interest on delay caused towards delivery of the possession of the said flat | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Neethi Prakasam A vs Casagrand Orlena | interest on delay of the possession of the said flats | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| SAMINATHAN K vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct to handover the units as soon as possible with promised Amenities, Impose penalty for violation of Sec-14 of RERA act, grand interest on delay may deem fit per justice. | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Amiya Ranjan Behera vs Casagrand Orlena | interest on delay of handing over the possession of the said flat i.e., E407 | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Nandini KS vs Casa Grande Garden City Builders Pvt ltd | A clear and legally binding timeline for the completion and handover of the flat, especially the clubhouse,Penalty or interest on paid amount. | AUTHORITY | 12/08/2025 |
| Raj Laxmi vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | Immediate possession of the flat as per the original agreement. Action against the developer for non-compliance and lack of disclosure | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Farookk Abdullah vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT.LTD., | Direct Promoter to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land documents,ensure timely delivery of our flat | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Vandanapu Durga Sai Dharsini vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | seeking interest on delay caused towards handing over the possession of the flat within stipulated time | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| RameshKumar Rajasekar vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | Direct promoter to share revised plan approval & clubhouse & documents. Ensure timely delivery of promised amenities and interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Soma Sarkar vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | Direct promoter to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land documents, ensure timely delivery of the premises and provide interest on the delay period in possession of premisses | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Hrithik Kumar Verma vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | interest on delay period towards handing over possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Sayantan Sam vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | 1. Interest for delayed period beyond Aug2024 for the entire amount of Rs 74,86,623.00 at the prevailing SBI PLR. 2. Penalty of Rs 20.00 Lakhs towards suppression of facts | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Shaheen bano vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | to pay the necessary interest towards the failure of handing over the possession within time. | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Nagendran R vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT.LTD., | interest on delay period towards handing over possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| A Anantha Shayana vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | Please expedite the process and make sure we get the flats at the earliest. If not please arrange for interest payable to buyer from the builder as said in the Sale Agreement | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Rupali Pandey vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | interest on delay period towards handing over possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| SAFINAZ TAHSEEN PAPABHAI vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | Seeking possession of my flat and interest on delay caused towards handing over of the same | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Sanjevi Srinivasan Naidu vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | interest on delay period towards handing over possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| VIJAYALAXMI BASAVALINGAPPA PATTAN vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | Direct the promoter to pay interest for the delay in handing over possession at the prescribed RERA rate starting from 21 August 2025 until the date of actual possession, and to complete the project | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Nigar Sultana vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | Direct promoters to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land development progress and delivery of the apartment | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| B N Chetan Sindhu vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | interest on delay period towards handing over possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Lohith Kumar H G vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT. LTD., | interest on delay period towards handing over possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Pradyumna Pramod Katageri vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT.LTD., | interest on delay period towards handing over possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| kuldeep kothari vs Casagrand Orlena | interest on delay period and plan should be approved and consent should be secured from 2/3 majority without further delay. | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| IswaryaLakshmi Mopuri vs Casagrand Orlena | Immediate action to ensure the completion and handover of the apartment as per the agreed timeline. Clarification and approval status for the clubhouse construction. Compensation/Interest for delay. | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Fazlur Rahman vs Casagrand Orlena | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Vigneshwari Rajasekaran vs Casagrand | need interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Kajal Rauto vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct promoter to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land documents, ensure timely delivery of promised amenities, and grant intrest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Suhird Sinha vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct promoter to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land documents, ensure timely delivery of promised amenities, and grant interest on delay period beyond the original August 2024 | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Shahul Hameed vs Casagrand Orlena | Order the Builder to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land documents, pay applicable interest on delay period and ensure prompt completion of the project and handover on time | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| AVINASH KIRTI vs Casagrand Orlena | Reprimand the builder for delaying the project and provide interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Arpan Sarkar vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct the promoter to promptly share the revised plan including all amenities agreed upon at the time of registration, and to provide appropriate interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Resmi Suresh M P vs Casagrand Orlena | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200816/0006368 16-08-2020 | Delay in Handover of Apartment C204 - CASAGRAND ROYCE Project | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211201/0008654 01-12-2021 | DELAYED COMPLETION BREACH OF TRUST FINANCIAL LOSSES SUFFERED BY COMPLAINANTS | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220321/0009178 21-03-2022 | Builder refuses to pay interset for the amount refunded after 4 years | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220616/0009641 16-06-2022 | Delay In hand over which was expected to be done by 9th of March 2022 | Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220706/0009722 06-07-2022 | Builder not refunding the booking amount due to unavailability of the unit | Casagrand Florella Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221104/0010175 04-11-2022 | Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensation | Casa Grande Lorenza (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221107/0010222 07-11-2022 | Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensation | Casa Grande Lorenza (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221221/0010496 21-12-2022 | Builder not adhering to the agreed and adding new clause in the sale deed | Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Suresh Kumar Marthandan - Destination Designs | - | 2017 | Jayanagar, Bangalore |
| Contractor | Casagrand | - | 2015 | Meanee Avenue road, Ulsoor road |
| Structural engineer | V G Palaksha - Anagha Engineering Consultants | - | - | - |
Casagrand has 20 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Casa Grande”) (average reported construction progress 41%). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹27.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank ULSOOR ROAD (IFSC ICIC0003904, a/c …1236). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
The nearest major job hub is ~2 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 2 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 8 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 13 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 15 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 19 km |
| Electronic City | 22 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 6 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get Casagrand Orlena approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For Casagrand Orlena, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Casa Grande. View Casa Grande's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Casagrand Orlena?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026