Casagrand Flamingo
K-RERA · the public record
CASAGRAND VIVACITY
Anekal · CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
30%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
0units not bookedof 717 · Q1 2026 filing
04 Apr 2029declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
23%
Q3 2025
25%
Q4 2025
30%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
04 Apr 2029
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
4BHK+4T
20
1BHK+1T
65
PENTHOUSE
10
3BHK+3T
314
STUDIO
65
2BHK+2T
243
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
10.5registered acres
68.1registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for CASAGRAND VIVACITY
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/220424/006830
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion4 April 2029
Land area42,593 sq m (10.5 acres)
Homes registered717
Tower/wing entries2
Unit mix20 × 4BHK+4T, 65 × 1BHK+1T, 10 × PENTHOUSE, 314 × 3BHK+3T, 65 × STUDIO, 243 × 2BHK+2T
In context
Density68.1 homes per acre
Density in context38th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 717 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 63,820 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 116,963 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 42,593 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 780 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 695 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 130 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | BDA/BL/E.S/T.A-1/H.S-2/E/04/2024-25 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 18-04-2024 | |
| Project start date | 30-04-2024 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4BHK+4T | 20 | 3% | 3,584 sqm |
| 1BHK+1T | 65 | 9% | 4,138 sqm |
| PENTHOUSE | 10 | 1% | 2,105 sqm |
| 3BHK+3T | 314 | 44% | 33,548 sqm |
| STUDIO | 65 | 9% | 2,430 sqm |
| 2BHK+2T | 243 | 34% | 18,015 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 9 | 381 | 349 | 29.95 m |
| Tower 2 | 9 | 336 | 431 | 29.95 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 717 official flat/unit rows, matching the 717 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK+3T | 314 | 101.9-115.7 sqm | 55.5-64.0 sqm | 412 |
| 2BHK+2T | 243 | 73.0-75.6 sqm | 38.9-42.7 sqm | 243 |
| 1BHK+1T | 65 | 63.7 sqm | 34.0-34.5 sqm | 65 |
| STUDIO | 65 | 37.3-37.4 sqm | 21.2-21.6 sqm | 0 (65 with 0) |
| 4BHK+4T | 20 | 179.2 sqm | 98.2-98.3 sqm | 40 |
| PENTHOUSE | 10 | 208.7-217.6 sqm | 116.5-121.6 sqm | 20 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 381 | 37.4-217.6 sqm | 21.2-121.6 sqm | 349 (50 with 0) |
| Tower 2 | 336 | 37.3-208.7 sqm | 21.6-117.8 sqm | 431 (15 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-G01 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 104.9 sqm | 57.6 sqm | 1 |
| A-G02 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 104.9 sqm | 57.4 sqm | 1 |
| A-G03 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 104.9 sqm | 57.4 sqm | 1 |
| A-G04 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 104.9 sqm | 57.4 sqm | 1 |
| A-G05 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 104.9 sqm | 57.6 sqm | 1 |
| A-G06 | Tower 1 | 0 | 1BHK+1T | 63.7 sqm | 34.3 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
7 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 28 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA complaint orders (1 complaint against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ramkumar vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT LTD | Refund of Rs. 33,72,125 with interest ( Rs. 33 lakhs paid to them directly, TDS amount of Rs. 30,475 deposited on their behalf and Rs. 41,650 for S.A Registration charges | AUTHORITY | 16/12/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200816/0006368 16-08-2020 | Delay in Handover of Apartment C204 - CASAGRAND ROYCE Project | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211201/0008654 01-12-2021 | DELAYED COMPLETION BREACH OF TRUST FINANCIAL LOSSES SUFFERED BY COMPLAINANTS | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220321/0009178 21-03-2022 | Builder refuses to pay interset for the amount refunded after 4 years | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220616/0009641 16-06-2022 | Delay In hand over which was expected to be done by 9th of March 2022 | Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220706/0009722 06-07-2022 | Builder not refunding the booking amount due to unavailability of the unit | Casagrand Florella Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221104/0010175 04-11-2022 | Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensation | Casa Grande Lorenza (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221107/0010222 07-11-2022 | Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensation | Casa Grande Lorenza (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221221/0010496 21-12-2022 | Builder not adhering to the agreed and adding new clause in the sale deed | Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing4 of 5 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Other recorded statuses: KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres): To Be Applied. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
5 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 23-02-2024 | Water Supply Noc.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | To Be Applied | - | View NOC |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 10-02-2024 | BESCOM NOC.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 09-10-2023 | AAI NOC.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 22-12-2023 | BSNL NOC.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | NARAYANA RAO M | 227948 | 2014 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560068 |
| Engineer | Shivaraj G Naik | BCC/B5-365E-138 | 2014 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560073 |
| Architect | Nagesh Pattan Shetty | CA/88/11690 | 2020 | Bengaluru Rural, Karnataka - 560085 |
| Contractor | CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT LTD | - | 2014 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560042 |
Builder track record
RERA filingCasagrand has 20 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Casa Grande”) (average reported construction progress 42%). 12 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹11.12 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.00 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 23% → 30% (+7 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 717/717 (100%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹6,441.43 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹70.30 Cr (0.01x collections) |
- 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
- Construction progress moved from 23% to 30% across the filed QPR window.
- The builder has drawn 0.01x of buyer collections from escrow (about 1% of the ₹6441 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹50.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK ULSOOR IFSC Code : KKBK0008049 Pin Code : 560042. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 4 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 4 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 9 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 15 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 17 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 23 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 39 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.