Alur Phase 2
K-RERA · the public record
KOMMAGHATTA NPKL PHASE-2
Bengaluru South · Bangalore Development Authority
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
30 Jul 2024declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
360registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
2BHK
360
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
3.1registered acres
117.4registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for KOMMAGHATTA NPKL PHASE-2
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/111124/007212
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion30 July 2024
Land area12,405 sq m (3.1 acres)
Homes registered360
Tower/wing entries3
Unit mix360 × 2BHK
In context
Density117.4 homes per acre
Density in context89th percentile of 791 Bengaluru South projects (median 77.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 360 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 29,718 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 37,236 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 12,405 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.4 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 360 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 360 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 82 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | 5/Housing/P/01/2019/2020 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 12-06-2019 | |
| Project start date | 24-08-2016 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 360 | 100% | 29,718 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | 14 | 120 | 120 | 44.09 m |
| F | 14 | 120 | 120 | 44.09 m |
| G | 14 | 120 | 120 | 44.09 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 360 official flat/unit rows, matching the 360 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 360 | 82.6 sqm | 37.9 sqm | 360 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | 120 | 82.6 sqm | 37.9 sqm | 120 |
| F | 120 | 82.6 sqm | 37.9 sqm | 120 |
| G | 120 | 82.6 sqm | 37.9 sqm | 120 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B5-001 | E | 0 | 2 BHK | 82.6 sqm | 37.9 sqm | 1 |
| B5-002 | E | 0 | 2 BHK | 82.6 sqm | 37.9 sqm | 1 |
| B5-003 | E | 0 | 2 BHK | 82.6 sqm | 37.9 sqm | 1 |
| B5-004 | E | 0 | 2 BHK | 82.6 sqm | 37.9 sqm | 1 |
| B5-005 | E | 0 | 2 BHK | 82.6 sqm | 37.9 sqm | 1 |
| B5-006 | E | 0 | 2 BHK | 82.6 sqm | 37.9 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
16 of 33 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 17 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Jul 2024 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Not identified in the document list
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Not identified in the document list
Fire NOCNot identified in the document list
Pollution control (KSPCB)Not identified in the document list
Environmental clearanceDocument listed: SEIAA
Airport Authority height clearanceDocument listed: Airport Authority of India
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (12 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190709/0003156 09-07-2019 | External Development Work not completed at Site Number B2 SI 2883 in NPKL | Formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200923/0006645 23-09-2020 | Non compliance by BDA of disclosure requirements under RERA | Formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/201210/0007235 10-12-2020 | DELAY IN REGISTRATION AND COMPENSATION FOR MENTAL AGONY | Formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/211018/0008447 18-10-2021 | Breach of Guidelines while calculation of Interest amount for delay in payment. | Formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220129/0008884 29-01-2022 | Lack of Basic amminties | Formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220324/0009247 24-03-2022 | COMPENSATION CLAIM FOR LACK OF PROGRESS IN NADAPRABHU KEMPEGOWDA LAYOUT FORMATION | Formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220328/0009268 28-03-2022 | 1. Compensation/Relief under the RERA Karnataka act 2017 (2) Basic Amenities in the layout (Water, Road, Electricity, drain etc) | Formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220401/0009299 01-04-2022 | Pending Amenities--Project Delayed | Formation of Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | T Srinivasa and Co. | 024213 | 2012 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560078 |
| Engineer | Girish M Swamy Consultants | BCCL/BL-3.6/SE-0068/23-24 | 2008 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560085 |
| Architect | AMBIANT ASSOCIATES | CA/2004/33778 | 2003 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560070 |
| Contractor | Ramalingam Construction Company Pvt Ltd | - | 1995 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560023 |
Builder track record
RERA filingBangalore Development has 14 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 14 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹39.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Canara Bank. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 22 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 17 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 22 km |
| Electronic City | 23 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 25 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 32 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 41 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.