Sowparnika Ashiyana Phase II
K-RERA · the public record
Sowparnika Flamenco
Anekal · Sowparnika Projects and Infrastructure
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Dec 2021declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
264registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Residential
264
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.2registered acres
121.8registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Sowparnika Flamenco
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/180120/002528
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2021
Land area8,774 sq m (2.2 acres)
Homes registered264
Tower/wing entries1
Unit mix264 × Residential
In context
Density121.8 homes per acre
Density in context89th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 264 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 11,351 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 8,774 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.74 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 206 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 30 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 260 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 14-12-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential | 264 | 100% | 11,351 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 264 | 206 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 264 official flat/unit rows, matching the 264 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 113 | 39.7-56.7 sqm | 29.8-42.2 sqm | 113 |
| 2BHK | 76 | 42.5-46.2 sqm | 31.7-34.8 sqm | 76 |
| 1BHK | 71 | 23.7-24.4 sqm | 18.0-19.1 sqm | 0 (71 with 0) |
| STUDIO | 4 | 19.0 sqm | 16.1 sqm | 0 (4 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 264 | 19.0-56.7 sqm | 16.1-42.2 sqm | 189 (75 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G01 | 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 51.1 sqm | 38.5 sqm | 1 |
| G02 | 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 51.1 sqm | 38.5 sqm | 1 |
| G03 | 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 51.1 sqm | 38.5 sqm | 1 |
| G04 | 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 51.1 sqm | 38.5 sqm | 1 |
| G05 | 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 52.0 sqm | 39.1 sqm | 1 |
| G06 | 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 52.0 sqm | 39.1 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 20 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2021, extended (Covid Extension) to 30 Sep 2022 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Not identified in the document list
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Not identified in the document list
Fire NOCNot identified in the document list
Pollution control (KSPCB)Document listed: KSPCB
Environmental clearanceNot identified in the document list
Airport Authority height clearanceNot identified in the document list
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (1 complaint against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| B sreekanth vs Sowparnika Projects and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. | 1.All amenities need to provide. 2.Based on this OS case the sowparnika might lost the absolute owner ship of the land by 50%, so if that is the case sale is invalid so builder need to by buyback. | AUTHORITY | 23/04/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (10 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190324/0002438 24-03-2019 | Flat - 122: Parking issue and delay penalty calculation | SOWPARNIKA SANVI PHASE II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190625/0003400 25-06-2019 | DEFICIENCY OF SERVICE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICE | SOWPARNIKA PURPLE ROSE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/201201/0007151 01-12-2020 | Approval obtained for G+8 floors but selling till G+15 floors, not refunding the amount after cancellation | SOWPARNIKA COLUMNS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/201201/0007152 01-12-2020 | Approval obtained for G+8 floors but selling till G+15 floors, not refunding the amount after cancellation | SOWPARNIKA COLUMNS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210803/0008202 03-08-2021 | Refund of amount against flat cancellation | SOWPARNIKA COLUMNS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/220818/0009913 18-08-2022 | Sowparnika Ashiyana - Not paying the refund | SOWPARNIKA COLUMNS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220901/0009964 01-09-2022 | REFUND OF EXCESS AMOUNT CHARGED & ALLOTMENT OF SUITABLE CAR PARKING ALONG WITH ITS ALLOTMENT LETTER | SOWPARNIKA SWASTIKA PHASE II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220915/0010018 15-09-2022 | Compensation for alterations in the original plan without the prior consent of the buyer | SOWPARNIKA COLUMNS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Builder track record
RERA filingSowparnika Projects has 13 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 100%). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹13.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Old Airport Road Branch (IFSC HDFC0000075, a/c …2832). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 13 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 13 km |
| Electronic City | 14 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 14 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 24 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 28 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 39 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.