K-RERA · the public record
Provident Park Square 4
Bengaluru South · Puravankara
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
1.7registered acres
195.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Provident Park Square 4
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/190129/002307
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 327 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 6,787 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 278 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 14-09-2018 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1-1B | 14 | 119 | 70 | - |
| B3-3C | 13 | 104 | 104 | - |
| B3-3D | 13 | 104 | 104 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 326 official flat/unit rows vs 327 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BHK | 118 | 32.0-43.0 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (118 with 0) |
| 3BHK | 106 | 55.0-71.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 106 |
| 2BHK | 102 | 53.3-55.0 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 102 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1-1B | 118 | 32.0-43.0 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (118 with 0) |
| B3-3C | 104 | 53.3-71.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 104 |
| B3-3D | 104 | 53.4-71.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 104 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1B-002 | B1-1B | 0 | 1BHK | 43.0 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 1B-003 | B1-1B | 0 | 1BHK | 43.0 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 1B-004 | B1-1B | 0 | 1BHK | 32.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 1B-005 | B1-1B | 0 | 1BHK | 32.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 1B-006 | B1-1B | 0 | 1BHK | 43.0 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 1B-007 | B1-1B | 0 | 1BHK | 43.0 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 25 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Aug 2022, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 28 May 2024 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 25 May 2023 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/230525/002307) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (8 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anand T N vs Provident Park Square-4 | Refund of interest of Rs. 27,898.96 from the date of charging interest at 24% p.a along with compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 for the loss of rental income | AUTHORITY | 18/11/2025 |
| Satish vs Puruvankara Limited | Compensation for the delayed period | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2024 |
| REKHA vs Puravankara Limited | 1. Interest for delay Period & 2. Order for the refund of excess gst collected by the Respondent | AUTHORITY | 17/11/2025 |
| MALLIKARJUN CHALLAGERI vs Puravankara Limited | Refund of interest of Rs. 35,330.52 along with interest @ 18%p.a. along with compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 for the loss of rent of ten months, mental agony and stress. | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2025 |
| SAHANA. S vs PURAVANKARA LIMITED | one year extension compensation | AUTHORITY | 07/10/2024 |
| Mohammed Najeebulla Shariff vs Provident Park Sqare -4 | Refund of Interest charged of Rs. 25,942.01 along with interest @ 18% p.a | AUTHORITY | 04/06/2026 |
| Shayeema Anwar vs Provident Park square | Prescribed interest for delay of 518 days in delivery of the apartment | AUTHORITY | 03/03/2026 |
| Ramya Raj vs Puravankara Limited | Requesting RERA to help me in refunding full amount | AUTHORITY | 01/09/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (53 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190321/0002481 21-03-2019 | Refund of 2lac rupees token amount | Provident Park Square Phase - 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190416/0002487 16-04-2019 | Delay of flat delivery and Compensation as per Rera act | Purva Westend Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190501/0002703 01-05-2019 | Misguided ,Forced to pay 10% and with out SBI approval of Tower -not given Requested Flat | Provident Park Square Phase - 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190511/0002977 11-05-2019 | NON REGISTRATION AND POSSESSION OF FLAT DELIVERY DATE EXPIRED | Purva Sunflower (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190525/0003132 25-05-2019 | Appeal for invoking section 18 of RERA Act for continuous delay in handover of apartment | Purva Westend Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/190611/0003274 11-06-2019 | Builder is not responding to: cancellation of agreement by buyer due to delay in completion | Purva Sunflower (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190618/0003322 18-06-2019 | Booking amount refund 2 lakhs | Provident Park Square 4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190714/0003570 14-07-2019 | Complaint under Sec 18, Sec 31 & Sec 71 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and under Rule 17, 29 & 30 of the Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules 2017. | Purva Palmbeach (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 1 project professional/vendor row across Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractor | Starworth Infrastructure Constructions Limited | - | 2008 | 39, Ulsoor Road |
Builder track record
RERA filingPuravankara has 30 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 79%). 13 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹30.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Standard Chartered Bank Koramangala (IFSC SCBL0036073, a/c …4445). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 13 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 13 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 14 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 18 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 22 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 26 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 41 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.