K-RERA · the public record
Godrej Splendour Phase II
Bengaluru East · Godrej Properties
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
14 Jan 2028
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
7.4registered acres
119.7registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Godrej Splendour Phase II
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/120123/005611
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 891 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 57,435 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 128,817 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 30,135 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.499 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 9 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 891 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 1,229 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 164 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | BDA/TPM/DLP-33/2018-19/252/2019- 20 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 04-05-2022 | |
| Project start date | 15-01-2023 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 4 | 5 | 1% | 221 sqm |
| 2BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 1 | 235 | 26% | 14,842 sqm |
| 3BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 4 | 17 | 2% | 1,436 sqm |
| 2BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 1A | 10 | 1% | 622 sqm |
| 1BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 3 | 6 | 1% | 329 sqm |
| 1BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 6 | 1 | 0% | 52 sqm |
| 2BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 2B | 2 | 0% | 124 sqm |
| 2BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 5 | 51 | 6% | 3,364 sqm |
| STUDIO MICRO | 35 | 4% | 750 sqm |
| 1BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 5 | 1 | 0% | 44 sqm |
| 3BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 2 | 34 | 4% | 2,808 sqm |
| 2BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 1B | 18 | 2% | 1,122 sqm |
| 1BHK MICRO | 1 | 0% | 36 sqm |
| 2BHK MICRO TYPE 2 | 71 | 8% | 3,533 sqm |
| 2BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 2A | 2 | 0% | 124 sqm |
| 3BHK MICRO | 36 | 4% | 2,350 sqm |
| 1BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 1 | 18 | 2% | 706 sqm |
| 2BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 2 | 136 | 15% | 8,589 sqm |
| 3BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 5 | 34 | 4% | 3,029 sqm |
| 2BHK MICRO TYPE 1 | 36 | 4% | 1,927 sqm |
| 3BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 3 | 69 | 8% | 5,872 sqm |
| 3BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 3A | 6 | 1% | 504 sqm |
| 1BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 2 | 9 | 1% | 469 sqm |
| 2BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 3 | 4 | 0% | 312 sqm |
| 2BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 4 | 18 | 2% | 1,156 sqm |
| 3BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 4A | 2 | 0% | 167 sqm |
| 3BHK OPTIMUM TYPE 1 | 34 | 4% | 2,933 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WING K | 20 | 112 | 112 | 67 m |
| WING L | 20 | 76 | 76 | 67 m |
| WING M | 20 | 76 | 76 | 67 m |
| WING N | 19 | 110 | 110 | 64 m |
| WING P | 19 | 110 | 110 | 64 m |
| WING Q | 20 | 76 | 76 | 67 m |
| WING R | 20 | 76 | 76 | 67 m |
| WING S | 20 | 76 | 76 | 67 m |
Showing first 8 of 9 tower/wing rows.
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 891 official flat/unit rows, matching the 891 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 583 | 51.2-80.5 sqm | 21.2-33.4 sqm | 583 |
| 3 BHK | 232 | 66.7-91.5 sqm | 27.3-38.6 sqm | 232 |
| 1 BHK | 41 | 37.6-57.4 sqm | 16.0-24.2 sqm | 41 |
| Studio | 35 | 21.4 sqm | 9.5 sqm | 35 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WING T | 179 | 21.4-66.7 sqm | 9.5-27.3 sqm | 179 |
| WING K | 112 | 40.7-87.5 sqm | 17.8-38.1 sqm | 112 |
| WING N | 110 | 46.7-87.5 sqm | 19.3-38.1 sqm | 110 |
| WING P | 110 | 46.7-87.5 sqm | 19.3-38.1 sqm | 110 |
| WING L | 76 | 56.0-91.5 sqm | 23.3-38.6 sqm | 76 |
| WING M | 76 | 56.0-68.4 sqm | 23.3-29.4 sqm | 76 |
| WING Q | 76 | 56.0-68.4 sqm | 23.3-29.4 sqm | 76 |
| WING R | 76 | 56.0-91.5 sqm | 23.3-38.6 sqm | 76 |
| WING S | 76 | 56.0-68.4 sqm | 23.3-29.4 sqm | 76 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KP1-01 | WING K | 1 | 2 BHK | 64.5 sqm | 27.6 sqm | 1 |
| KP1-06 | WING K | 1 | 2 BHK | 64.5 sqm | 27.6 sqm | 1 |
| KP2-01 | WING K | 2 | 2 BHK | 64.5 sqm | 27.6 sqm | 1 |
| KP2-06 | WING K | 2 | 2 BHK | 64.5 sqm | 27.6 sqm | 1 |
| K01-01 | WING K | 3 | 2 BHK | 65.5 sqm | 28.3 sqm | 1 |
| K01-02 | WING K | 3 | 2 BHK | 65.5 sqm | 28.3 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
⚠ 28 of 45 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Board Resolution for Authorized Signatory/Certificate of Authorization, Organization Structure, Affidavit, Certificate from Chartered Account, Commencement Certificate and more.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (10 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200108/0005167 08-01-2020 | Refund of Booking Amount | Godrej Aqua (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210207/0007592 07-02-2021 | Request for complete refund on cancellation of Sale Process with M/s. Godrej Properties Limited in respect of Apartment bearing Flat No: GDAQC104 at Godrej Aqua Project, Bengaluru | Godrej Aqua (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211112/0008548 12-11-2021 | AS NO BANK IS APPROVING THE PROJECT I HAVE NO CONFIDENCE TO FOR LOAN WITH LANDERS LIKE GODREJ HOUSING FINANCE / I WISH TO PROCEED WITH BANK ONLY FOR PLOT LOAN | Godrej Woodland (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220112/0008784 12-01-2022 | COMPLAINT UNDER SECION 31 AND 14(2) IN FRONT OF THE ADJUDICATION AUTHORITY | Godrej Aqua (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220117/0008812 17-01-2022 | To refund the Booking amount of Rs. 7,60,142.14 | Godrej Aqua (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220222/0009039 22-02-2022 | REFUND OF DEPOSIT AMOUNT AND COMPENSATION | Godrej Aqua (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220510/0009445 10-05-2022 | refund of the amount paid | GODREJ PARK RETREAT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220510/0009449 10-05-2022 | Refund of booking amount paid in march 2022, with interest | GODREJ PARK RETREAT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing10 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | Bhavesh Shah | 840002872 | 2005 | Thane, Maharashtra - 400602 |
| Engineer | Ms. Madhura Manjrekar | 840002872 | 2007 | Mumbai City, Maharashtra - 400051 |
| Architect | EDIFICE CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. | CA/2011/52942 | 1998 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001 |
| Contractor | M/s MKR Constructions | - | 2015 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560067 |
Builder track record
RERA filingGodrej Properties has 30 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Godrej Properties”) (average reported construction progress 45%). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹5.28 Cr collected from buyers, ₹6.74 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹6.74 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹5.28 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 27% → 34% (+7 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 781/891 (88%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹128.92 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹89.51 Cr (0.69x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 27% to 34% across the filed QPR window.
- The builder has drawn 0.69x of buyer collections from escrow (about 69% of the ₹129 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
- In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹50.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank MG Road Bangalore IFSC Code : UTIB0000009 Pin Code : 560001. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 5 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 11 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 14 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 16 km |
| Electronic City | 21 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 21 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.