Shriram Green Field Phase 2
K-RERA · the public record
SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1
Hosakote · SHRIVISION TOWERS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Mar 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
935registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
APARTMENTS
935
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
13.7registered acres
68.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1250/304/PR/171014/001213
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 March 2019
Land area55,467 sq m (13.7 acres)
Homes registered935
Tower/wing entries6
Unit mix935 × APARTMENTS
In context
Density68.2 homes per acre
Density in context39th percentile of 117 Hosakote projects (median 78.8)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 935 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 76,969 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 55,467 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~3.04 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈168,437 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 55,467 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 6 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 935 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 181 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-03-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| APARTMENTS | 935 | 100% | 76,969 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 19 | 150 | 150 | - |
| B | 19 | 151 | 151 | - |
| C | 19 | 149 | 149 | - |
| D | 19 | 149 | 149 | - |
| E | 19 | 185 | 185 | - |
| F | 19 | 151 | 151 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 935 official flat/unit rows, matching the 935 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2+Study | 375 | 76.4-81.1 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 375 |
| 3BHK | 298 | 89.2 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 298 |
| 3 BHK | 111 | 89.2 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 111 |
| 2BHK | 77 | 60.0-73.6 sqm | 0.0-0.1 sqm | 77 |
| 2+study | 73 | 80.1-80.1 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 73 |
| 2 BHK | 1 | 73.6 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 1 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | 185 | 60.0-89.2 sqm | 0.0-0.1 sqm | 185 |
| B | 151 | 73.6-89.2 sqm | 0.1-0.1 sqm | 151 |
| F | 151 | 73.6-89.2 sqm | 0.1-0.1 sqm | 151 |
| A | 150 | 60.0-89.2 sqm | 0.0-0.1 sqm | 150 |
| C | 149 | 73.6-89.2 sqm | 0.1-0.1 sqm | 149 |
| D | 149 | 73.6-89.2 sqm | 0.1-0.1 sqm | 149 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A - 101 | A | 1 | 2+Study | 80.1 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 1 |
| A - 102 | A | 1 | 3BHK | 89.2 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 1 |
| A - 103 | A | 1 | 3BHK | 89.2 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 1 |
| A - 104 | A | 1 | 2BHK | 60.0 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| A - 105 | A | 1 | 2+Study | 76.4 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 1 |
| A - 106 | A | 1 | 2+Study | 76.4 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 21 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Mar 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Mar 2020 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 22 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1250/304/PR/220622/001213) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (14 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| G Sivasankari vs SHRIVISION TOWERS PVT LTD, SMT. RATHNAMMA | Refund the compensation and interest amount | AUTHORITY | 31/10/2022 |
| Devyani Vasant Phegade vs SHRIVISION TOWERS PVT LTD | Delay interest, compensation, quash illegal demand notes, etc. | AUTHORITY | 31/10/2022 |
| PRABHU KUMAR XAVIER vs SHRIVISION TOWERS PVT LTD, SHRIPROP HOMES PVT LTD | (i) Direct respondents to immediately give possession of the scheduled property as per agreement, Delay Compensation compenstion of Rs. 1500000/-for mental harassment, legal cost of Rs. 150000/-- | AUTHORITY | 31/10/2022 |
| SUBHAYAN SAHA vs M/S SHRIVISION TOWERS PVT.LTD. | Fix all the cracks & compensate for damage | AUTHORITY | 29/12/2022 |
| Atul Kumar Aggarwal vs SHRIVISION TOWERS PVT LTD | Delay interest, compensation, others | AUTHORITY | 28/11/2022 |
| Manish Kumar Agrawal vs SHRIVISION TOWERS PVT LTD | Quash demand notes, possession, delay interest, compensation etc | AUTHORITY | 28/11/2022 |
| SANJIV JAISWAL vs SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1 | Compensation as per RERA ROI | AUTHORITY | 26/07/2022 |
| VIKAS KUMAR MORE vs SHRIVISION TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED & 6 OTHERS | Delay Interest and direct the Respondent to complete the amentities | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2024 |
| MONU KUMAR vs SHRIVISION TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | PRM/KA/RERA/1250/304/PR/171014/001213 | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Abhishek vs SHRIVISION TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1. Resolve the issues 2. Remove unfair interest amount. 3. Allot Car Parking. 4. Monthly Delay Compensation For Bank Interest since July 2020. | AUTHORITY | 19/01/2023 |
| RAJ KUMAR MISHRA vs SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE I | Prescribed rate of interest for Delay in handing over possession of apartment unit from date of promised possession i.e., 31/06/2018 till actual handover of possession i.e., 12/10/2019, and legal cost | AUTHORITY | 13/05/2024 |
| Shriram Greenfield Delayed Possesion vs SHRIVISION TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Compensation and Possession | AUTHORITY | 08/06/2023 |
| Minakshi Ghosh vs SHRIVISION TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Delay interest, Compensation, Inspection, Ors | AUTHORITY | 06/09/2024 |
| SANILESH M vs SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1 | Direct to account entire disbursement of lender and refund excess amount collected and also interest paid to lender for the delayed period. | AUTHORITY | 04/09/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (114 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190407/0002589 07-04-2019 | Delay in possession and Compensation | SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190407/0002596 07-04-2019 | Delayed Possession & compensation required | SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190408/0002584 08-04-2019 | [Same as Complaint number- CMP/181202/0001707] Possession Delay & Compensation for the delayed time frame | SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190408/0002590 08-04-2019 | Delay in handover in contractual (fit for possession) condition with no confirmation of actual handover dates as well as adequate compensation for delay. | SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190409/0002612 09-04-2019 | Delay in handover in contractual (fit for possession) condition with no clarity of compensation for delay. | SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190410/0002436 10-04-2019 | Delay in handover in contractual (fit for possession) condition with no confirmation of compensation for delay | SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190411/0002619 11-04-2019 | Delay in possession. No compensation. | SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190411/0002621 11-04-2019 | Willful Delay in Project without communicating about the delay upfront | SHRIRAM GREEN FIELD PHASE 1 | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Kadur Krishna Siddharth | - | 2004 | HRBR 2nd Block, Kalyan Nagar Bangalore |
| Contractor | ICONICA CONSTRUCTIONS | - | 2015 | Indiranagar 2nd Stage, Bangalore |
| Structural engineer | INNOTECH ENGINEERING CONSULT PVT LTD | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹41.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road, Bangalore (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …5597). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 11 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 11 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 15 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 15 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 17 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 19 km |
| Electronic City | 27 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.