Sree Adithya Lotus Park
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Lily Realty · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/171014/000345
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 5 approved drawings and 23 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I occupies 7.7 acres with 672 registered homes in 5 towers, featuring 725 units of Residential 3bhk and pent house. With 86.7 homes per acre, it ranks at the 68th percentile of the 1118 Bengaluru East projects tracked here (median 75.7). Its declared completion date of 31 December 2018 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/171014/000345, and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Dec 2018.
31 Dec 2018
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I spans 31,363 sq m (7.75 acres), comprises 5 towers, registers 672 units, and is declared to cost ₹910.05 cr.
₹910.05 cr
declared project cost
7.75acres
31,363 sq m
672units
on the registration
3.25FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 672 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 88,887 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 31,363 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 672 total (0 open) — 1.00 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 19-10-2012 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential 3bhk and pent house | 725 | 100% | 88,887 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block A | 39 | 149 | 149 | - |
| BLOCK B | 39 | 149 | 149 | - |
| Block C | 38 | 76 | 76 | - |
| Block D | 39 | 149 | 149 | - |
| Block E | 39 | 149 | 149 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 671 official flat/unit rows vs 672 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 652 | 1,084.6-1,446.3 sqft | 314.8-416.4 sqft | 652 |
| 4BHK | 18 | 2,102.2-2,802.0 sqft | 659.2-851.2 sqft | 36 |
| 0 | 1 | 0.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (1 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOCK B | 149 | 1,103.3-2,521.0 sqft | 325.0-771.4 sqft | 153 |
| Block A | 149 | 1,084.6-2,450.8 sqft | 318.0-736.2 sqft | 153 |
| Block D | 149 | 1,243.6-2,802.0 sqft | 361.6-851.2 sqft | 153 |
| Block E | 148 | 0.0-2,630.8 sqft | 0.0-813.2 sqft | 151 (1 with 0) |
| Block C | 76 | 1,166.0-2,419.5 sqft | 340.6-775.2 sqft | 78 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0100A | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,085.8 sqft | 318.0 sqft | 1 |
| T0100B | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,225.8 sqft | 355.4 sqft | 1 |
| T0100C | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,251.5 sqft | 351.0 sqft | 1 |
| T0100D | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,101.2 sqft | 322.6 sqft | 1 |
| T0101A | Block A | 2 | 3BHK | 1,084.6 sqft | 318.0 sqft | 1 |
| T0101B | Block A | 2 | 3BHK | 1,225.8 sqft | 355.4 sqft | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 23 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (an extension) to 30 Oct 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. An extension application filed on 29 Dec 2018 is pending with K-RERA — until it is approved, the registration stands lapsed.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (25 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pradeep Kumar Dhandania vs Lily Realty Pvt Ltd | Compensation/Interest for Delay and Execution of Sale Deed/Handing over of possession of the Flat | AUTHORITY | 28/03/2024 |
| Anand Dhariya vs LILY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of money with interest | AUTHORITY | 26/06/2023 |
| MR MALYADRI VALLAPUNENI & ANOTHER vs M/S.LILLY REALTY PVT LTD. | Delivery of apartment and payment of delay compensation. | AUTHORITY | 22/11/2023 |
| GANESH SHANKAR RAJ vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD. | Delay Compensation OR full refund | AUTHORITY | 22/08/2022 |
| MIHIR KUMAR PATRO vs M/s.LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Delay Compensation | AUTHORITY | 20/02/2024 |
| SHYAM KANODIA vs PASHMINA WATER FRONT PHASE 1 | 1) Compensation- Rs. 13,92,090/-2 )Rebate for Pending Work- Rs. 2,05,180/- 3)Interest on installments paid Rs. 92,76,029/- 4)Allotment of one normal car parking and 1 stacked car parking. | AUTHORITY | 18/08/2026 |
| MR UMESH K PATEL vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | The complainants be pleased to pass an order directing the opposite party to receive the balance amount and deliver the fully constructed flat bearing no. T0434d at in the tower name t04, 34th floor | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2025 |
| LEELA UTHAPPA vs PASHMINA WATERFRONT PHASE 1 | REIMBURSEMENT OF THE BOOKING AMOUNT OF RS.10,60,000/- WITH 24% INTEREST RATE PER ANNUM UNTIL DATE OF SUCH PAYMENT | AUTHORITY | 16/11/2023 |
| Shiladitya Patnaik vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Completion and handover of my flat and adequate compensation for the delay | AUTHORITY | 14/12/2024 |
| Manish Hotwani vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | I need help from Rera to ask the builder to provide compensation as per the agreement. I am willing to take possession, if builder provides compensation. | AUTHORITY | 13/12/2022 |
| Hemant Kumar Rajput & Esha Guha vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Need monetary compensation for all the short comings. Also wants to get the developer team out of project, as they coerce their way on residents. Want full control of property to association | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2024 |
| Gopal Agarwal and Amit Agarwal vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Delay Compensation as per RERA Act & Rules | AUTHORITY | 11/10/2022 |
| Avinash Bhan vs LILY REALTY PVT.LTD | Refund with interest | AUTHORITY | 10/11/2025 |
| Vasanti D Patel vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Complainants above named humbly prays that this Authority be pleased to pass an order directing Respondent to receive the balance amount and deliver the fully constructed flat bearing flat no.T0433D | AUTHORITY | 10/06/2025 |
| DHANUMJAY J vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Full refund with Interest and additional costs incurred | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| ASHWINI KUMAR vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Requesting refund with compensation | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| SATHISH N PRABHU vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Delay compensation of Rs. 7,57,444/- and not to cause harassment until completion of apartment in accordance with Construction Agreement and direction to handover apartment within specified time limit | AUTHORITY | 09/09/2023 |
| MANISH SRIVASTAVA vs PASHMINA WATER PHASE 1 | Expecting Rera to help me getting refund of Rs. 270000 | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| Saloni Brahmachari vs Lily Realty Pvt Ltd | Direction to the builder to either cure the deficiencies in the apartment or waive off the remaining payment so that the Complainants can get the work done themselves | AUTHORITY | 05/07/2023 |
| Arun Kumar Jain vs PASHMINA WATER FRONT PHASE 1 | refund the initial booking amount of rupees Rs.2,70,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Seventy Thousand Only) along with the delayed interest of 18% per annum plus DAMAGES | AUTHORITY | 05/03/2025 |
| Arun Ramasubramanian vs LILY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED | Compensation, Refund, Completion of pending works | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2023 |
| H Subramanian and Pushpa Subramanian vs LILY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED | Compensation, Refund, Completion of pending work | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2023 |
| Gurprit Singh Johal vs Lily Realty Pvt Ltd | I am seeking possession of my flat and compensation for delay and agony caused by developer | AUTHORITY | 02/12/2023 |
| DEEPESH KHATRI & SHIVANI CHOPRA vs M/S LILY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED | I believe & expect a fair action from RERA that results in payment of delay compensation with penalty interest from builder which I am contractually obligated to receive. | AUTHORITY | 02/08/2023 |
| SANTANU BASU MALLIK vs Pashmina Waterfront Phase 1 | Direct Respondent to pay Rs.77,02,346 to Petitioner towards damages for delay in possession, refund of Pre EMI, damages, Interest on capital paid | AUTHORITY | 01/07/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (40 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190616/0003311 16-06-2019 | Non-completion of project by promised date | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190712/0003559 12-07-2019 | The Apt scheduled handover date was 30.06.15 including 6 months grace period. The apt is still not complete in all respect. | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190729/0003719 29-07-2019 | Delay in handover, incorrect charges and for the harassment and wasted time, and not being able to buy and use any alternative either | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190831/0003668 31-08-2019 | Deviation in clubhouse plan and poor workmanship in flat | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191105/0004558 05-11-2019 | 5 Year Delay, Breach of Agreement, Full Refund and 10% interest compensation | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191108/0004568 08-11-2019 | Claiming damages and Compensation for the delay cost by the Promoter | PASHMINA WATERFRONT -PHASE-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191112/0004699 12-11-2019 | Property not delivered. Need my money back with interest | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191119/0004762 19-11-2019 | Delayed and pending for long time.request refund with interest and penalty relief | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Mr.Tilak Thomas | - | 1999 | Kasturba Road Cross, off Lavelle Road |
| Contractor | Seema Electricals Private Limited | - | 1996 | Model House 4th Street, Basavanagudi |
| Structural engineer | Mr.N.N.Nagendra kumar | - | - | - |
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹135.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: YES BANK Bandra (IFSC YESB0000134, a/c …0333). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
The nearest major job hub is ~7 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 7 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 10 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 13 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 19 km |
| Electronic City | 21 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 5 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Lily Realty.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026