K-RERA · the public record
Sobha City Athena
Bengaluru North · SOBHA
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a unit? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your unit, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
31 Dec 2026
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
1.4registered acres
52.4registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Sobha City Athena
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/200526/003430
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 72 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 7,671 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 5,564 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.3 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 122 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 8 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 20-03-2020 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flats | 72 | 100% | 7,671 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (Wing) | 19 | 72 | 122 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 72 official flat/unit rows, matching the 72 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 72 | 106.4-106.8 sqm | 62.2-63.5 sqm | 0 (72 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (Wing) | 72 | 106.4-106.8 sqm | 62.2-63.5 sqm | 0 (72 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A - 1021 | A (Wing) | 2 | 3BHK | 106.4 sqm | 63.1 sqm | 0 |
| B - 1022 | A (Wing) | 2 | 3BHK | 106.5 sqm | 63.4 sqm | 0 |
| C - 1023 | A (Wing) | 2 | 3BHK | 106.5 sqm | 63.5 sqm | 0 |
| D - 1024 | A (Wing) | 2 | 3BHK | 106.8 sqm | 63.4 sqm | 0 |
| A1 - 1031 | A (Wing) | 3 | 3BHK | 106.4 sqm | 62.2 sqm | 0 |
| B1 - 1032 | A (Wing) | 3 | 3BHK | 106.5 sqm | 62.4 sqm | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filing⚠ 2 litigation cases on record
- W.P filed by Sobha Limited against BBMP and Others, challenging the Improvement Charges claimed by BBMP — High Court of Karnataka (2015)
- W.P filed by Sobha Limited against State of Karnataka and Others, challenging the Beneficiary Capital Contribution Charges and Advance probable Pro-rata Charges claimed by BBMP — High Court of Karnataka (2018)
12 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 23 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (127 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190217/0002175 17-02-2019 | Compensation for Delay of projects | Sobha City - Casa Paradiso Block 4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190218/0002166 18-02-2019 | Refund of booking amount | Sobha Dream Acres - Palm Springs Phase 17 Wing 54 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190225/0002263 25-02-2019 | Refund of Advance amount- | Sobha Arena - The Park ( Block 2 ) (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190308/0002388 08-03-2019 | Non-allotment of agreed units & Refund | Sobha Indraprastha (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190308/0002322 08-03-2019 | Promoter SL Demanding 38% payment of unit cost before entering the ATS | Sobha Arena - Pebble Court (Block 1) (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190315/0002219 15-03-2019 | About refund of booking amount | Sobha Dream Acres - Tropical Greens Phase 8 Wing 43 and 44 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190324/0002505 24-03-2019 | Compensation against late delivery | Sobha City - Casa Paradiso Block 4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190401/0002556 01-04-2019 | Please refund booking amount | Sobha Dream Acres - Rain Forest Phase 2 Wing 3 and 4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing1 of 4 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Other recorded statuses: Water supply and sewage board: To Be Applied; KPTCL- BESCOM: To Be Applied; Fire and Safety: Applied. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
6 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | To Be Applied | - | View NOC |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 05-11-2025 | KSPCB CFE Athena 05112025.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | To Be Applied | - | View NOC |
| Fire and Safety | Applied | 05-12-2025 | View NOC |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Geetha K. Nair | - | 1993 | Sarjapur-Marthahalli Outer Ring Road, Bellandur |
| Contractor | Sobha Limited | - | 1995 | Sarjapur-Marthahalli Outer Ring Road, Bellandur |
| Structural engineer | Anilkumar S Hokrani | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingSobha has 121 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Sobha”) (average reported construction progress 60%). 60 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹2.62 Cr collected from buyers, ₹2.69 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹2.69 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹2.62 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 88% → 100% (+12 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 72/72 (100%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹8.90 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹13.56 Cr (1.52x collections) |
- 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
- Construction progress moved from 88% to 100% across the filed QPR window.
- The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.
- Across available QPR rows, escrow withdrawals are 1.52x buyer collections. Ask the builder to reconcile this against certified project costs and prior-period balances.
- In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹92.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank M G Road Branch (IFSC UTIB0000009, a/c …2966). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 4 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 4 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 15 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 16 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 17 km |
| Electronic City | 26 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.