Godrej Woodland
K-RERA · the public record
GODREJ WOODS
Yelahanka · GODREJ PROPERTIES
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
4%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
284units not bookedof 558 · Q1 2026 filing
30 Nov 2030declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
0%
Q3 2025
2%
Q4 2025
4%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
30 Nov 2030
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
2BHK+2T TYPE 2(A)
40
3BHK+3T TYPE 5
14
2BHK+2T TYPE 3
2
3BHK+3T TYPE 4
14
3BHK+3T TYPE 3
54
2BHK+2T TYPE 1A
66
3BHK+3T TYPE 2
138
2BHK+2T TYPE 1B
14
2BHK+2T TYPE 2(B)
102
3BHK+3T TYPE 1
112
2BHK+2T TYPE 4
2
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
6.9registered acres
80.9registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for GODREJ WOODS
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/472/PR/121125/008248
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion30 November 2030
Land area27,923 sq m (6.9 acres)
Homes registered558
Tower/wing entries10
Unit mix40 × 2BHK+2T TYPE 2(A), 14 × 3BHK+3T TYPE 5, 2 × 2BHK+2T TYPE 3, 14 × 3BHK+3T TYPE 4, 54 × 3BHK+3T TYPE 3, 66 × 2BHK+2T TYPE 1A, 138 × 3BHK+3T TYPE 2, 14 × 2BHK
In context
Density80.9 homes per acre
Density in context57th percentile of 125 Yelahanka projects (median 76)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 558 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 121,219 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 121,187 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 27,923 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.98 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 10 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 558 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 644 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 104 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | BBMP/Addl.Dir/JDNORTH/0045/ 25-26 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 04-11-2025 | |
| Project start date | 25-11-2025 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 2(A) | 40 | 7% | 2,676 sqm |
| 3BHK+3T TYPE 5 | 14 | 3% | 1,565 sqm |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 3 | 2 | 0% | 200 sqm |
| 3BHK+3T TYPE 4 | 14 | 3% | 1,565 sqm |
| 3BHK+3T TYPE 3 | 54 | 10% | 6,047 sqm |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 1A | 66 | 12% | 4,443 sqm |
| 3BHK+3T TYPE 2 | 138 | 25% | 13,157 sqm |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 1B | 14 | 3% | 963 sqm |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 2(B) | 102 | 18% | 6,815 sqm |
| 3BHK+3T TYPE 1 | 112 | 20% | 12,212 sqm |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 4 | 2 | 0% | 188 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 13 | 52 | 52 | 41.45 m |
| Tower 2 | 13 | 66 | 66 | 41.45 m |
| Tower 3 | 13 | 66 | 66 | 41.45 m |
| Tower 4 | 13 | 53 | 53 | 41.45 m |
| Tower 5 | 14 | 57 | 57 | 44.4 m |
| Tower 6 | 13 | 53 | 53 | 41.45 m |
| Tower 7 | 13 | 53 | 53 | 41.45 m |
| Tower 8 | 13 | 53 | 53 | 41.45 m |
Showing first 8 of 10 tower/wing rows.
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 558 official flat/unit rows, matching the 558 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK+3T TYPE 2 | 138 | 95.3 sqm | 46.4 sqm | 138 |
| 3BHK+3T TYPE 1 | 112 | 109.0 sqm | 53.9 sqm | 112 |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 2B | 89 | 66.8 sqm | 29.4 sqm | 89 |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 1A | 66 | 67.3 sqm | 30.1 sqm | 66 |
| 3BHK+3T TYPE 3 | 54 | 112.0 sqm | 55.0 sqm | 54 |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 2A | 27 | 66.9 sqm | 29.4 sqm | 27 |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 1B | 14 | 68.8 sqm | 30.6 sqm | 14 |
| 3BHK+3T TYPE 4 | 14 | 111.8 sqm | 56.7 sqm | 14 |
| 3BHK+3T TYPE 5 | 14 | 111.8 sqm | 53.8 sqm | 14 |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 2(A) | 13 | 66.9 sqm | 29.4 sqm | 13 |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 2(B) | 13 | 66.8 sqm | 29.4 sqm | 13 |
| 2BHK+2T TYPE 3 | 2 | 100.2 sqm | 49.5 sqm | 2 |
Showing first 12 of 13 unit type groups.
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 2 | 66 | 66.8-112.0 sqm | 29.4-55.0 sqm | 66 |
| Tower 3 | 66 | 66.8-112.0 sqm | 29.4-56.7 sqm | 66 |
| Tower 5 | 57 | 95.3-109.0 sqm | 46.4-53.9 sqm | 57 |
| Tower 4 | 53 | 66.8-68.8 sqm | 29.4-30.6 sqm | 53 |
| Tower 6 | 53 | 66.8-95.3 sqm | 29.4-46.4 sqm | 53 |
| Tower 7 | 53 | 95.3-111.8 sqm | 46.4-53.9 sqm | 53 |
| Tower 8 | 53 | 94.1-109.0 sqm | 46.4-53.9 sqm | 53 |
| Tower 9 | 53 | 94.1-109.0 sqm | 46.4-53.9 sqm | 53 |
| Tower 1 | 52 | 66.8-112.0 sqm | 29.4-55.0 sqm | 52 |
| Tower 10 | 52 | 66.8-109.0 sqm | 29.4-53.9 sqm | 52 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-1- 002 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T TYPE 3 | 112.0 sqm | 55.0 sqm | 1 |
| T-1- 101 | Tower 1 | 1 | 2BHK+2T TYPE 2(A) | 66.9 sqm | 29.4 sqm | 1 |
| T-1- 102 | Tower 1 | 1 | 3BHK+3T TYPE 3 | 112.0 sqm | 55.0 sqm | 1 |
| T-1- 104 | Tower 1 | 1 | 2BHK+2T TYPE 2(B) | 66.8 sqm | 29.4 sqm | 1 |
| T-1- 201 | Tower 1 | 2 | 2BHK+2T TYPE 2(A) | 66.9 sqm | 29.4 sqm | 1 |
| T-1- 202 | Tower 1 | 2 | 3BHK+3T TYPE 3 | 112.0 sqm | 55.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
3 of 28 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 25 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (10 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200108/0005167 08-01-2020 | Refund of Booking Amount | Godrej Aqua (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210207/0007592 07-02-2021 | Request for complete refund on cancellation of Sale Process with M/s. Godrej Properties Limited in respect of Apartment bearing Flat No: GDAQC104 at Godrej Aqua Project, Bengaluru | Godrej Aqua (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211112/0008548 12-11-2021 | AS NO BANK IS APPROVING THE PROJECT I HAVE NO CONFIDENCE TO FOR LOAN WITH LANDERS LIKE GODREJ HOUSING FINANCE / I WISH TO PROCEED WITH BANK ONLY FOR PLOT LOAN | Godrej Woodland (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220112/0008784 12-01-2022 | COMPLAINT UNDER SECION 31 AND 14(2) IN FRONT OF THE ADJUDICATION AUTHORITY | Godrej Aqua (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220117/0008812 17-01-2022 | To refund the Booking amount of Rs. 7,60,142.14 | Godrej Aqua (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220222/0009039 22-02-2022 | REFUND OF DEPOSIT AMOUNT AND COMPENSATION | Godrej Aqua (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220510/0009445 10-05-2022 | refund of the amount paid | GODREJ PARK RETREAT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220510/0009449 10-05-2022 | Refund of booking amount paid in march 2022, with interest | GODREJ PARK RETREAT (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing10 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | Bhavesh Dinesh Shah | 121603 | 2009 | Thane, Maharashtra - 400602 |
| Engineer | B E Pruthviraja | BCCL/BL-3.6/SE-0061/21-22 | 2021 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560076 |
| Architect | Shreyas M | CA/2012/56957 | 2012 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560076 |
| Contractor | GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED | - | 2000 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560038 |
Builder track record
RERA filingGodrej Properties has 30 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Godrej Properties”) (average reported construction progress 47%). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹47.49 Cr collected from buyers, ₹20.65 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 0% → 4% (+4 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 274/558 (49%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹131.19 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹32.55 Cr (0.25x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 0% to 4% across the filed QPR window.
- The builder has drawn 0.25x of buyer collections from escrow (about 25% of the ₹131 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹89.2 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank MG Road IFSC Code : UTIB0000009 Pin Code : 560001. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 7 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 7 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 13 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 15 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 20 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 20 km |
| Electronic City | 29 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.