MahaRERA · the public record
Forest Hills Ph 1 at The Prestige City
Veena Nagar, Mulund (W) · PRESTIGE MULUND REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Empire Solitaire
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Dosti Pine · earlier comprehensive example
North-east at the door. Or in the living room.
E2506 has north-east-facing living space and a south-west entrance. E3001 reverses those directions and sits on the top floor. The report compares named flats, refuge adjacency and shared gardens using the March 2026 filing, read on 17 September 2026; this is not live availability.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Dosti Pine sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 19 Jul 2026RERA details for Forest Hills Ph 1 at The Prestige City
MahaRERA · P51800077457
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
Forest Hills Ph 1 at The Prestige City is registered with MahaRERA as P51800077457 and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Dec 2030.
31 Dec 2030
declared completion
50months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 19 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | P51800077457 |
| Registered on | 16 Aug 2024 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 31 Dec 2030 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 50 months to the declared date |
Promoter record
What else is this promoter on record for?
PRESTIGE MULUND REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED is the promoter of record on 6 projects registered with MahaRERA.
6projects
registered with MahaRERA
Counted across Quietlist's full MahaRERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · MahaRERA register, all projects · read 19 Jul 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In Forest Hills Ph 1 at The Prestige City, 264 of 663 homes filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked (110 with registered agreements and 154 booked), about 40%, and 399 are filed as unsold.
40%sold or booked
264 of 663 homes
₹1107.53 Cr
committed by buyers
Counts and agreement value as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability. Of that agreement value, ₹119.21 Cr (about 11%) is recorded as collected and ₹988.31 Cr as receivable.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 19 Jul 2026
Filed agreement values: across 264 sold or booked entries with usable filed values and areas, the effective carpet rate is ₹31,491/sqft, with eight in ten falling between ₹28,545 and ₹33,884 — computed from the agreement values and carpet areas the promoter filed, not broker quotes.
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
What the filings record, home by home
Read from MahaRERA on 25 October 2026
MahaRERA publishes, home by home, what this promoter filed: which homes are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for sold or booked entries the filed agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific home. On this project 264 homes carry one, and 399 of the 663 are recorded unsold.
Here is one home filed as unsold, beside the amounts filed for comparable homes:
| Home | Carpet | Filed comparison | Based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFH-A-1001 | 1,187 sqft | Rs 3.75 cr typical, over Rs 3.13 cr to Rs 4.03 cr | 99 filed · similar area (within 2%), same building |
A filed consideration is the amount the promoter reported for one home. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the home is available to you today. Only one observation of this ledger so far: no change can be reported yet. This observation is an archived copy whose time is the moment the file was written, not a portal fetch time.
In Forest Hills Ph 1 at The Prestige City, 373 of the 399 unsold homes have filed sales to compare with. The Sales Report gives each of them its own row — the filed agreements behind its comparison listed in full, the government reckoner value the promoter filed against it, and mortgage status where the filing supplies it. Missing mortgage information is not confirmation that a unit is free of a mortgage. Built from the filing itself, sent by email.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+77 and 663 homes are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing A | 1 | G+77 | 342 | - |
| Wing B | 1 | G+77 | 321 | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 663 residential.
Legal and disputes
What disputes are disclosed?
1 complaint is on the MahaRERA record for Forest Hills Ph 1 at The Prestige City, with orders passed in 0 of them.
1complaint
0with an order
Counts as disclosed in the project record.
Source · MahaRERA project disclosures · read 19 Jul 2026
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| SM12600398 | 30/05/2026 | Bhakti Achrekar vs PRESTIGE MULUND REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED | pending / no order on file |
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 24 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 22 “Ongoing”; 2 “Pending” (filed description; status field empty). These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your home. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bombay High Court | 1448 | 2005 | Ongoing Filed description: Pending |
| Bombay High Court | 1161 | 2009 | Ongoing Filed description: Pending |
| Bombay High Court | 1138 | 2011 | Ongoing Filed description: Pending |
| Bombay High Court | 16078 | 2014 | Ongoing Filed description: Preadmission |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 2922 | 2023 | Ongoing Filed description: Pending |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 3947 | 2023 | Ongoing Filed description: Pending |
| Supreme Court Of India | 6073 | 2024 | Status not supplied Filed description: Pending |
| Bombay High Court | 105 | 2020 | Ongoing Filed description: Pending |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 647 | 2021 | Ongoing Filed description: Pending |
| Supreme Court Of India | 6328 | 2024 | Status not supplied Filed description: Pending |
| National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission | 2194 | 2018 | Ongoing Filed description: The Petitioners filed the case on 28.09.2018 alleging deficiency in services, along with IAs 18418 and 18419 of 2019. On 04.10.2018, the Court directed service of the complaint on the Respondents, returnable on 10.05.2019, and restrained them from creating third-party rights. IA 5099 of 2022 was then filed seeking directions to restrain alteration or change of plans of the subject property. Vide order dated 30.05.2022, the Court noted that the NCLT had imposed a Moratorium under the IBC, 2016, staying all proceedings against Aristo Developers. Accordingly, the Commission chose not to proceed and adjourned the matter sine die, granting liberty to revive it once NCLT decided or permitted continuation. On 28.08.2023, after the statutory 45-day period lapsed and no one appeared for the Respondent, the reliefs sought were allowed, and permission was granted to the Petitioner to file a class-action complaint and publish public notice. |
| Mulund Metropolitan Magistrate | SW/131 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Criminal complaint filed under filed under Section 406 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3, 4 and 7 of Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act. The case is to be withdrawn however signature of withdrawal letter is pending. |
| Mulund Metropolitan Magistrate | SW/111 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Criminal complaint filed under filed under Section 406 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3, 4 and 7 of Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act. The case is to be withdrawn as per the withdrawal letter signed in May 2023 by Pushpa Patel on behlaf of Shailesh Patel. |
| Mulund Metropolitan Magistrate | SW/122 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Criminal complaint filed under filed under Section 406 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3, 4 and 7 of Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act. The case is to be withdrawn however signature of withdrawal letter is pending. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate Esplanade 23Rd Court | SS/1069 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Criminal Complaint filed under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate Esplanade 23Rd Court | SS/1070 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Criminal Complaint filed under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate Esplanade 23Rd Court | SS/1071 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Criminal Complaint filed under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate Esplanade 23Rd Court | SS/1072 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Criminal Complaint filed under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 449 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: Seeking extension of 12 months to handover the units. |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 2167 | 2025 | Ongoing |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 89 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: The Applicant filed an intervention application in IA 449 of 2025, filed by PMRPL for extension of completion dates for the Bellanza and PTC projects. The Applicant states it is an association of homebuyers of Celestia, Fantasia and Big Boom Celestia in the Ariisto Heaven project, who are to receive flats in Wing A of Bellanza from PEPL. PEPL had committed possession by 23.09.2024 but obtained extensions from NCLT without impleading buyers or their representative, concealed key decisions, and compelled buyers to sign Agreements for Sale with possession shifted to December 2026 under threat of cancellation. After missing the extended deadline of 23.06.2025, PEPL has sought a further 12-month extension through IA 449/2025 without notice to the Association. The Applicant seeks directions to SRA to implead it and all affected homebuyers. |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 3262 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: NA |
| Bombay High Court | 15053 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: The Appellants challenge the illegal and arbitrary S.R. Scheme and Eviction Order dated 23.07.2025 for the Ghatipada CHS (Prop) slum plot, citing malafides, violation of natural justice, and breach of statutory rights. Residents have lived there for over 75 years, yet redevelopment was repeatedly obstructed by the lessee and successive developers. In 2022, R-8 PMRPL imposed a scheme without informing residents, verifying consents, or holding a GBM, and later proposed a rehab site 1.5 km away without consent. Despite assuring same-site rehab on 14.08.2023, R-8 failed to share plans and later denied the assurance. Complaints went unresolved, and a biased hearing process after the show-cause notice dated 04.06.2025 led to the impugned Eviction Order, issued during the festival season and followed by demolition threats. The Appeal seeks to quash the scheme and the eviction order. |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 4261 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: NA |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at Veena Nagar, Mulund (W), Adishakti Marg, Off LBS Marg, Andheri, Mumbai Suburban, 400080. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by CTS No - 3B, to the south by Existing 13M DP Road, to the east by Proposed 13M DP Road and CTS No - 19-4 and to the west by CTS No - 2. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 8 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 8 km |
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 10 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 13 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 15 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 24 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 31 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.