Tirupati Apartments Chsl
MahaRERA · the public record
Forest Hills Ph 2 at The Prestige City
Veena Nagar, Mulund (W) · PRESTIGE MULUND REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
392units filed as unsoldInventory · 18 October 2026
31 Mar 2032declared completionMahaRERA registration · read 18 Jul 2026
500registered unitsMahaRERA registration · read 18 Jul 2026
From another project · Empire Solitaire
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Dosti Pine · earlier comprehensive example
North-east at the door. Or in the living room.
E2506 has north-east-facing living space and a south-west entrance. E3001 reverses those directions and sits on the top floor. The report compares named flats, refuge adjacency and shared gardens using the March 2026 filing, read on 17 September 2026; this is not live availability.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Dosti Pine sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 18 Jul 2026RERA details for Forest Hills Ph 2 at The Prestige City
MahaRERA · PR1181012600556
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
Forest Hills Ph 2 at The Prestige City is registered with MahaRERA as PR1181012600556 and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Mar 2032.
31 Mar 2032
declared completion
65months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 18 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | PR1181012600556 |
| Registered on | 27 May 2026 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 31 Mar 2032 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 65 months to the declared date |
Promoter record
What else is this promoter on record for?
PRESTIGE MULUND REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED is the promoter of record on 6 projects registered with MahaRERA.
6projects
registered with MahaRERA
Counted across Quietlist's full MahaRERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · MahaRERA register, all projects · read 18 Jul 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In Forest Hills Ph 2 at The Prestige City, 0 of 500 homes filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked, about 0%, and 500 are filed as unsold.
0%sold or booked
0 of 500 homes
Counts as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 18 Jul 2026
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
What the filings record, home by home
Read from MahaRERA on 18 October 2026
MahaRERA publishes, home by home, what this promoter filed: which homes are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for sold or booked entries the filed agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific home. On this project 108 homes carry one, and 392 of the 500 are recorded unsold. Since we started watching this ledger, 131 homes have moved out of the unsold list, most recently on 18 October 2026.
Here is one home filed as unsold, beside the amounts filed for comparable homes:
| Home | Carpet | Filed comparison | Based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFH-D-0101 | 1,185 sqft | Rs 3.89 cr typical, over Rs 3.00 cr to Rs 4.09 cr | 51 filed · similar area (within 2%), same building |
A filed consideration is the amount the promoter reported for one home. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the home is available to you today. One of the two observations is an archived copy whose time is the moment the file was written, not a portal fetch time.
In Forest Hills Ph 2 at The Prestige City, 382 of the 392 unsold homes have filed sales to compare with. The Sales Report gives each of them its own row — the filed agreements behind its comparison listed in full, the government reckoner value the promoter filed against it, and mortgage status where the filing supplies it. Missing mortgage information is not confirmation that a unit is free of a mortgage. Built from the filing itself, sent by email.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+75 and 500 homes are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing - 'C' | 1 | G+38 | 153 | - |
| Wing - 'D' | 1 | G+75 | 347 | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 500 residential.
Complaints
No buyer complaints were on this project's MahaRERA record at the time of reading.
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 22 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 22 “Ongoing”. These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your home. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bombay High Court | 15053 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: "The matter was filed concerning eviction / demolition notice passed by SRA for the concerned slum society. Hon’ble High Court passed interim order in favour of the society dated 20.11.2025. While the Hon’ble Bombay High Court had initially granted interim protection against eviction to the slum society, the said order was subsequently challenged by the Developer before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. The Hon'ble Supreme Court noted that, the development undertaken by the developer and the scheme approved by SRA and demolition order issued by SRA, which was in line with the SRA norms. Hence, passed direction of demolition of the structures vide order dated 13.01.2026. Pursuant thereto, the SRA demolished the slum structures in compliance with the directions issued by the Supreme Court. However, the concerned Writ Petition is still pending before Hon'be High Court making the prayers infructuous in line with the Hon'ble Supreme Court Order and demolition undertaken. |
| Bombay High Court | 1448 | 2005 | Ongoing Filed description: The Plaintiff alleges to have certain rights under an agreement executed around 1987. Accordingly, the Plaintiff has filed this matter in 2005 seeking specific performance of the concerned agreement but has not been able to obtain any releif in this regard till date and more so multiple phases has been developed and handed over on the land parcel with the requisite approvals of the relevant authorities, post receipt of NCLT order dated 23.03.2021. Nonetheless, the matter is still pending and has not been listed for hearing for a while now. |
| Bombay High Court | 1161 | 2009 | Ongoing Filed description: This suit is filed by Renu Grover & Anr. seeking declaration of a Sub-Lease Agreement dated February 14, 1995 pertaining to the portion of larger land being developed by the developer. The matter was filed in 2009 wherein a notice of motion was heard and rejected by the Bombay High Court, which was subsequently also upheld by Hon'ble Supreme Court. However, the matter is still pending but the Plaintiff has not been able to obtain any releif in this regard till date and more so multiple phases has been developed and handed over on the land parcel with the requisite approvals of the relevant authorities, post receipt of NCLT order dated 23.03.2021. This matter is clubbed with Suit No. 1138 of 2011. |
| Bombay High Court | 1138 | 2011 | Ongoing Filed description: This suit is filed by Ramesh Agarwal & Anr. against Renu Grover & Ors seeking declaration that the Sub-Lease dated February 14, 1995 pertaining to the portion of the larger land developed by the developer, as the same is forged unlawful and void in nature. This matter is clubbed with Suit No. 1161 of 2009. |
| Bombay High Court | 16078 | 2014 | Ongoing Filed description: This Writ Petition is filed by the Company against the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Pune, challenging an order that increased the market value of the property under the Deed of Assignment from ₹61 crore to ₹63.93 crore. Bombay High Court subsequently by order passed in 2014, directed no coercive steps against the Company in any manner whatsoever. |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 647 | 2021 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Gregory D'souza and Anr challenging the additional charges, penalties etc. levied by HDFC Bank from whom the Applicant had taken a loan. The application has been heard and is reserved for orders. There are no reliefs sought against the Company. |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 2922 | 2023 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by IK Agencies Pvt. Ltd. against the Company seeking entitlement to ₹1,51,23,373/- and an injunction restraining the Company from dealing with or creating third-party rights over 15,000 sq. ft. carpet area of commercial premises in the project. Wherein the developer has already paid the requisite amount and reserved certain area in the office building for the Applicant, as per NCLT order. |
| National Company Law Tribunal | 3947 | 2023 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Messrs Ashok Commercial Enterprises against the Company seeking direction to disclose full details of the commercial area being developed in the project. Wherein the developer has already provided with all concerned details along with reservation letter for their respective enitilments in the concerned project. |
| Bombay High Court | 105 | 2020 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Ratnesh Chand Jain & Ors. before Bombay High Court against Union of India & Ors., aggrieved by non-payment of pre-EMI interest under the subvention scheme. Wherein, the developer has already paid any pending amount in light with NCLT order dated 23rd March 2021. |
| National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission | 2194 | 2018 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Mr. Francis Joseph Nadar and 26 others against Messrs Ariisto Developers before the National Consumer Redressal Commission, New Delhi. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorder under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious. |
| State Consumer Redressal Forum | CC/16/1144 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Mrs. Shivani Agarwal against Messrs Ariisto Developers before the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorder under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious |
| State Consumer Redressal Forum | CC/17/614 | 2017 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Mr. Chandrakant Nagji Patel against Messrs Ariisto Developers before the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorder under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate, 27Th Court, Mulund | 131/SW/16 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Mr. Rizwan Maraikar before Metropolitan Magistrate, 27th Court, Mulund under Section 406 & 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 & 7 of Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorded under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious against the developer and same is in line with section 32(a) of IBC, 2014. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate, 27Th Court, Mulund | 111/SW/16 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Mr. Shailesh Kantilal Patel before Metropolitan Magistrate, 27th Court, Mulund under Section 406 & 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 & 7 of Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorded under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious against the developer and same is in line with section 32(a) of IBC, 2014. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate, 27Th Court, Mulund | 122/SW/16 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Mrs. Sheetal Sali before Metropolitan Magistrate, 27th Court, Mulund under Section 406 & 34 IPC and Sections 3, 4 & 7 of Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorded under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious against the developer and same is in line with section 32(a) of IBC, 2014. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate, 27Th Court, Mulund | 1069 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Messrs Ashok Commercial Enterprises before Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Esplanade under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorded under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious against the developer and same is in line with section 32(a) of IBC, 2014. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate, 27Th Court, Mulund | 1070 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Messrs Ashok Commercial Enterprises before Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Esplanade under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorded under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious against the developer and same is in line with section 32(a) of IBC, 2014. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate, 27Th Court, Mulund | 1071 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Messrs Ashok Commercial Enterprises before Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Esplanade under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorded under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious against the developer and same is in line with section 32(a) of IBC, 2014. |
| Metropolitan Magistrate, 27Th Court, Mulund | 1072 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Messrs Ashok Commercial Enterprises before Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Esplanade under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorded under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious against the developer and same is in line with section 32(a) of IBC, 2014 |
| Bombay High Court | 459 | 2017 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Messrs Ashok Commercial Enterprises before the Bombay High Court against Messrs Ariisto Developers & Ors. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorded under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious against the developer and same is in line with section 32(a) of IBC, 2014 |
| Nclt | 4955 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: The Developer filed an I.A. (I.B.C) No. 4955 of 2025 before NCLT, Mumbai Bench seeking further extension of timeline of completion specified in the resolution plan along with the additional affidavit filed before the NCLT. |
| Bombay High Court | 675 | 2019 | Ongoing Filed description: Filed by Messrs Ashok Commercial Enterprises before the Bombay High Court against Messrs Ariisto Developers & Ors. Further this matter remains pending, however the complaintants have already accepted the resolution plan before the NCLT and the same is recorded under order dated 23rd March 2021 hence the prayer sought under this matter stands infructious against the developer and same is in line with section 32(a) of IBC, 2014. |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at Veena Nagar, Mulund (W), Adishakti Marg, Off LBS Marg, Andheri, Mumbai Suburban, 400080. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by C.T.S. NO. 3B, to the south by Existing 13.40 M D.P Road, to the east by Proposed 13.40 M. D.P Road (C.T.S. NO.19/4) and to the west by C.T.S. NO. 2. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 8 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 8 km |
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 10 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 13 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 15 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 24 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 31 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.