MahaRERA · the public record
Grand Slam and Game Point
MULUND WEST · Ricardo Constructions Private Limited
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Empire Solitaire
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Dosti Pine · earlier comprehensive example
North-east at the door. Or in the living room.
E2506 has north-east-facing living space and a south-west entrance. E3001 reverses those directions and sits on the top floor. The report compares named flats, refuge adjacency and shared gardens using the March 2026 filing, read on 17 September 2026; this is not live availability.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Dosti Pine sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 18 Jul 2026RERA details for Grand Slam and Game Point
MahaRERA · P51800005668
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
Grand Slam and Game Point is registered with MahaRERA as P51800005668 and the promoter has declared completion for 30 Apr 2028.
30 Apr 2028
declared completion
18months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 18 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | P51800005668 |
| Registered on | 11 Aug 2017 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 30 Apr 2028 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 18 months to the declared date |
Approvals and compliance
What compliance filings are on record?
MahaRERA's defaulter and deregistration lists and the quarterly-progress filing for Grand Slam and Game Point record 4 quarterly progress reports since registration.
4quarterly filings
Entries as they appear on MahaRERA's own lists and the project's progress filing.
Source · MahaRERA defaulter, deregistration and QPR lists · read 18 Jul 2026
- Filing progress reports — 4 quarterly progress reports on record since registration, with no current default.
Promoter record
What else is this promoter on record for?
Ricardo Constructions Private Limited is the promoter of record on 3 projects registered with MahaRERA.
3projects
registered with MahaRERA
Counted across Quietlist's full MahaRERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · MahaRERA register, all projects · read 18 Jul 2026
Construction
How much construction cost has been reported?
In Grand Slam and Game Point, ₹6.01 Cr of a declared ₹118.05 Cr estimated project cost is reported as incurred, about 5.1%, as at the last certified filing with MahaRERA.
5.1%
₹6.01 Cr
of ₹118.05 Cr declared cost
Cost incurred as last certified to MahaRERA. It is a financial measure, not a survey of site work, and it can lag on-site reality between filings.
Source · MahaRERA quarterly progress filing · read 18 Jul 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In Grand Slam and Game Point, 168 of 360 homes filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked (50 with registered agreements and 118 booked), about 47%, and 192 are filed as unsold.
47%sold or booked
168 of 360 homes
₹223.83 Cr
committed by buyers
Counts and agreement value as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability. Of that agreement value, ₹78.05 Cr (about 35%) is recorded as collected and ₹145.78 Cr as receivable.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 18 Jul 2026
Filed agreement values: across 168 sold or booked entries with usable filed values and areas, the effective carpet rate is ₹16,921/sqft, with eight in ten falling between ₹13,467 and ₹22,077 — computed from the agreement values and carpet areas the promoter filed, not broker quotes.
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
What the filings record, home by home
Read from MahaRERA on 19 October 2026
MahaRERA publishes, home by home, what this promoter filed: which homes are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for sold or booked entries the filed agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific home. On this project 184 homes carry one, and 176 of the 360 are recorded unsold. Since we started watching this ledger, 25 homes have moved out of the unsold list, most recently on 04 September 2026.
Here is one home filed as unsold, beside the amounts filed for comparable homes:
| Home | Carpet | Filed comparison | Based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Game Point1205 | 671 sqft | Rs 1.16 cr typical, over Rs 60.82 lakh to Rs 1.59 cr 2 unusually low or high filed amounts are included in this range. Check the individual entries before using it to discuss a price. | 77 filed · similar area (within 2%), same building |
A filed consideration is the amount the promoter reported for one home. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the home is available to you today. One of the two observations is an archived copy whose time is the moment the file was written, not a portal fetch time.
In Grand Slam and Game Point, 174 of the 176 unsold homes have filed sales to compare with. The Sales Report gives each of them its own row — the filed agreements behind its comparison listed in full, the government reckoner value the promoter filed against it, and mortgage status where the filing supplies it. Missing mortgage information is not confirmation that a unit is free of a mortgage. Built from the filing itself, sent by email.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+47 and 360 homes are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRAND SLAM AND GAME POINT | 1 | G+47 | 360 | 30 Dec 2024 |
Unit mix on the filing: 360 residential.
Legal and disputes
What disputes are disclosed?
57 complaints are on the MahaRERA record for Grand Slam and Game Point, with orders passed in 57 of them.
57complaints
57with an order
Counts as disclosed in the project record.
Source · MahaRERA project disclosures · read 18 Jul 2026
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC006000000194892 | 12/11/2020 | PRASHANT GAWADE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000012338 | 11/12/2017 | Mr. Maulik Kirti Mehta vs Nirmal Lifestyle Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000022840 | 10/01/2018 | Jayeshkumar Jain vs Nirmal Lifestyle Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000044459 | 09/05/2018 | Mrs. Vasudha Mukund Deshpande vs M/s Nirmal Lifestyle Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000055589 | 03/08/2018 | Mr Manoj Vishnu Dalvi and Mrs Vaishali Manoj Dalvi vs M/s Nirmal Lifestyle Pvt Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000056400 | 01/10/2018 | Rahul Arun Bhirud & Arun Laxman Bhirud vs Ms. Nirmal Lifestyle Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000068166 | 02/03/2019 | Mr Sunil Suresh Potdar vs M/s Nirmal lifestyle (Kalyan) Pvt Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000193970 | 10/09/2020 | GRAND SLAM AND GAME POINT WELFARE ASSOCIATION vs Ricardo Construction Pvt.Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000194020 | 22/09/2020 | PRASAD PRABHU vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194024 | 22/09/2020 | KISHORE KUSHALCHAND SHAH vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194023 | 03/10/2020 | AMRUTPAL ANAND SOM vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194025 | 22/09/2020 | JEBA ANAND DEVMANI NADAR vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194027 | 22/09/2020 | SHAILESH KISAN FIRAKE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194057 | 22/09/2020 | SURAJIT SHAKTI MAKUR vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194058 | 22/09/2020 | VISHAL VITTAL NAYAK vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194059 | 22/09/2020 | JULESH DIVAKAR PINGLE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194060 | 03/10/2020 | JAHAR LAL SAHA vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194062 | 22/09/2020 | CLOTILDA JOSEPH CARDOZA vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194182 | 26/09/2020 | PRAVEEN JAIN vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194209 | 03/10/2020 | JAYA S KOTIAN vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194183 | 03/10/2020 | MANISH P THAKUR vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194210 | 03/10/2020 | ASHOK PANDE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194284 | 06/10/2020 | RAJANI BABU ATHAWALE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194587 | 05/11/2020 | ZAHIR WYKES vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194307 | 07/10/2020 | AMEY U PHAYDE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194308 | 06/10/2020 | RAKHI SINGH vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194320 | 06/10/2020 | AMIT PRAJAPATI vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194322 | 07/10/2020 | MUSTAK B ODIYA vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194323 | 06/10/2020 | SUNDARARAJ MOOTHEDATHPADY KRISHNAN vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194317 | 08/10/2020 | SNEHA PUNDLIK AWATE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194324 | 14/10/2020 | SUHAS NANASAHEB JADHAV vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194361 | 15/10/2020 | BHAGYSHREE HERAMBH KANADE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194395 | 15/10/2020 | DAGMA FERNANDES vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194403 | 23/10/2020 | RAJESH S CHOWTA vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194405 | 15/10/2020 | RAJAN SITARAM LOKE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194419 | 15/10/2020 | TUSHAR DIGAMBAR BHOLE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194420 | 15/10/2020 | VIVEK PANDHARINATH KEDARE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194435 | 17/10/2020 | VIVEK RADHAKRISHNAN vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194437 | 17/10/2020 | SHAILESH DATTATRAYA CHAVAN vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194515 | 27/10/2020 | SWAROOP SANJIVA SUVARNA vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194590 | 27/10/2020 | SUHAS VISHNU CHAUDHARI vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194535 | 24/10/2020 | SANDEEP RAMJI SAXENA vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194592 | 28/10/2020 | TUSHAR LILADHAR CHAUDHARI vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194599 | 23/10/2020 | NEETA AVINASH SHIKHARE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194660 | 28/10/2020 | RUPALI ANAND BUTE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194661 | 28/10/2020 | ANANDRAO POL vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194662 | 27/10/2020 | RACHNA SHARMA vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000194666 | 27/10/2020 | GANESH K IYER vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000194802 | 04/11/2020 | JEEVAN J POL vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000195652 | 16/01/2021 | HT Media Limited vs Ricardo Constructions Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000195659 | 16/01/2021 | HT Media Limited vs Ricardo Constructions Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000195660 | 16/01/2021 | HT Media Limited vs Ricardo Constructions Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000194873 | 11/11/2020 | VIJAYKUMAR HIRAMAN CHAUDHARY vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000195272 | 19/12/2020 | BAIJU KURIAN KANJIRKATTE vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000197094 | 28/05/2021 | SEBASTIAN I D vs RICARDO CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000199271 | 04/12/2021 | Giridhar Venkataswamy Gonhal vs Ricardo Construction Pvt.Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000374913 | 23/03/2023 | GINISHA ARVIND TURE vs NIRMAL DEVELOPERS | order passed |
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 4 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 4 “Ongoing”. These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your home. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honrable State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mumbai | CC/805/15 | 2015 | Ongoing Filed description: Adjourned |
| Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (Mahareat) | AT006000000144425 | 2023 | Ongoing Filed description: Appeal filed seeking refund of Consideration paid under s.18 of RERA |
| Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (Mahareat) | AT006000000144426 | 2023 | Ongoing Filed description: Appeal filed seeking refund of Consideration paid under s.18 of RERA |
| Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (Mahareat) | AT006000000144427 | 2023 | Ongoing Filed description: Appeal filed seeking refund of Consideration paid under s.18 of RERA |
Deadline Extensions
The MahaRERA completion deadline for this project has been formally extended 1 time, as recorded on the register.
| From | Extended to | Stated reason |
|---|---|---|
| as registered | 30 Apr 2028 | Dear Sir/ Madam, Please find enclosed following documents for processing our extension application request: a) Tab 1 & 2 - Resolution of the Association of Allottees: Format B- |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at MULUND WEST, JSD ROAD, Mumbai City, Mumbai City, 400080. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by CTS 661 1 5, to the south by Building No 5, to the east by 13 MTR Wide Jatashanker Dossa Road and to the west by Center Court. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 9 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 9 km |
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 11 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 14 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 16 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 24 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 32 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.