K-RERA · the public record
Century Breeze
Bengaluru North · Century Real Estate Holdings
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
5.7registered acres
56.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Century Breeze
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/170916/000324
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 322 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 23,066 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~2.13 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈49,204 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 23,066 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 322 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 322 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-09-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 81 | 81 | - |
| 2 | 13 | 81 | 81 | - |
| 3 | 14 | 160 | 160 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 322 official flat/unit rows, matching the 322 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 190 | 113.3-126.6 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 190 |
| 2BHK | 100 | 82.8-97.6 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 100 |
| Other | 32 | 97.8-165.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 32 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 160 | 82.8-124.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 160 |
| 1 | 81 | 97.6-165.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 81 |
| 2 | 81 | 95.9-158.6 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 81 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 126.6 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 003 | 1 | 0 | Other | 165.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 004 | 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 118.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 005 | 1 | 0 | 2BHK | 97.6 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 006 | 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 117.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 101 | 1 | 1 | 3BHK | 126.6 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 21 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Jun 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 25 Nov 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/201125/000324) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (8 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mrs Anju Krishnan K vs Century Real Estate Holdings Private Limited | To direct the respondent to refund the booking amount along with interest, compensation and legal cost amounting to Rs. 3,00,000/- | AUTHORITY | 23/09/2022 |
| Mrs C Latha vs Century Real Estate Holdings Private Limited | To direct the respondent to refund the booking amount along with interest, compensation and legal cost amounting to Rs. 3,00,000/- | AUTHORITY | 23/09/2022 |
| KANNAN KRISHNAN vs CENTURY REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED | Century Breeze must settle the Land Owners immediately and complete my registration and hand over immediately | AUTHORITY | 23/02/2023 |
| Krishna Kumar Gupta vs CENTURY REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS PVT LTD | I urgently request the intervention of the RERA Authority to address this matter. It is imperative that RERA takes swift and decisive action to ensure the immediate issuance of the remaining refund. | AUTHORITY | 15/05/2025 |
| MRS. SWETA KANYAL & MR. SUNIL TEWARI vs CENTURY REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMNITED, MRS. SWETA KANYAL, SMART ASSET SERTVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., VINAY BHASAKARAN. | Refund Rs.14,98,000/- (which includes interest and Compensation) with future interest. | AUTHORITY | 14/06/2023 |
| Suraj Pai A vs CENTURY BREEZE | Based on rental value of Rs.23000 per month for similar furnished properties in the area, I demand a compensation for 27 months of Rs. 6,21,000 and the legal fees of Rs. 7,500, totalling Rs. 6,28,500. | AUTHORITY | 06/12/2023 |
| SAMIR GANESH JOSHI vs CENTURY REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct Respondent to refund interest @20%p.a. on amount paid; 2) Direct Respondent to close loan acc. no. 632526021 & 633758801 with HDFC Bank by paying dues & issuing NOCs; 3) Such other relief | AUTHORITY | 02/12/2022 |
| Samir Ganesh Joshi vs Cetury Breeze | a.Direct the Respondent to refund the unpaid interest at 20% p.a. calculated until the final settlement date. | AUTHORITY | 01/09/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (10 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200111/0005185 11-01-2020 | Delivery Date Expiry by 21 months from Apr 2018 and still under construction | Century Ethos (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200310/0005416 10-03-2020 | Refund of money with interest and Compensation | Century Breeze | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210729/0008169 29-07-2021 | project land an extent of 3 acre is under TITLE dispute in RFA 956/2018 | Century Ethos (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/211206/0008688 06-12-2021 | Delayed Handover of Century Ethos-902- More than 37 months from the Agreement end date plus 6 months grace period- Compensation for Delay | Century Ethos (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220207/0008984 07-02-2022 | Refund of unpaid interest @20% p.a. & profits @50% on sale of flats. | Century Breeze | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220322/0009236 22-03-2022 | Delayed by 3 years beyond agreed date - 2019 | Century Breeze | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220630/0009708 30-06-2022 | Non-refund of booking amount | Century Breeze | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220712/0009740 12-07-2022 | Non-refund of booking amount | Century Breeze | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Builder track record
RERA filingCentury Real Estate has 18 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Century Real”) (average reported construction progress 59%). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹48.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …8175). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 6 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 6 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 13 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 16 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 20 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 21 km |
| Electronic City | 29 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.