Jahnavi Brindavan
K-RERA · the public record
MITTAL PALMS
Bengaluru North · TRISHUL DEVELOPERS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
01 Aug 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
224registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
2 & 3 BHK
32
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
3.3registered acres
67.3registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for MITTAL PALMS
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/180328/000585
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion1 August 2019
Land area13,460 sq m (3.3 acres)
Homes registered224
Tower/wing entries7
Unit mix32 × 2 & 3 BHK
In context
Density67.3 homes per acre
Density in context39th percentile of 529 Bengaluru North projects (median 75.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 224 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 36,000 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 13,460 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 7 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 224 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 105 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-01-2013 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 & 3 BHK | 32 | 100% | 36,000 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 8 | 32 | 32 | - |
| B | 8 | 32 | 32 | - |
| C | 8 | 32 | 32 | - |
| D | 7 | 28 | 28 | - |
| E | 7 | 28 | 28 | - |
| F | 8 | 32 | 32 | - |
| G | 8 | 40 | 40 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 224 official flat/unit rows, matching the 224 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 127 | 923.5-1,445.4 sqft | 524.3-795.0 sqft | 127 |
| 2BHK | 97 | 901.5-978.2 sqft | 513.0-552.7 sqft | 97 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G | 40 | 901.5-1,321.3 sqft | 513.0-730.7 sqft | 40 |
| A | 32 | 1,299.4-1,445.4 sqft | 719.3-795.0 sqft | 32 |
| B | 32 | 949.0-1,314.0 sqft | 537.6-730.7 sqft | 32 |
| C | 32 | 949.0-1,314.0 sqft | 537.6-730.7 sqft | 32 |
| F | 32 | 949.0-1,284.8 sqft | 537.6-711.7 sqft | 32 |
| D | 28 | 949.0-1,314.0 sqft | 537.6-726.9 sqft | 28 |
| E | 28 | 923.5-1,277.5 sqft | 524.3-708.0 sqft | 28 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,419.8 sqft | 781.8 sqft | 1 |
| 002 | A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,445.4 sqft | 795.0 sqft | 1 |
| 003 | A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,299.4 sqft | 719.3 sqft | 1 |
| 004 | A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,303.0 sqft | 721.2 sqft | 1 |
| 101 | A | 2 | 3BHK | 1,419.8 sqft | 781.8 sqft | 1 |
| 102 | A | 2 | 3BHK | 1,445.4 sqft | 795.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
4 of 14 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 10 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 01 Aug 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 01 Aug 2020 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 20 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/220620/000585) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (9 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAISHALI AJAY THETE & AJAY B THETE vs TRISHUL DEVELOPERS | Refund + Interest + Penalty | AUTHORITY | 23/01/2023 |
| VIVEK KUMAR GUPTA & SAVYA SACHI GUPTA vs M/S TRISHUL DEVELOPERS OFFICE AT MITTAL TOWERS & OM PRAKASH MITTAL | Refund and Compensation | AUTHORITY | 17/07/2023 |
| VISHAL JHUNJHUNWALA vs M/S TRISHUL DEVELOPERS | Cancellation of Flat& refund+Interest+Compensation | AUTHORITY | 11/01/2024 |
| NIKIL NARAYANAN vs R. NARAYANASWAMY& OTHERS | Amnt rcvd+interest+compensation=Rs. 84,89,275/- | AUTHORITY | 11/01/2024 |
| ASHA JHUNJHUNWALA vs M/S TRISHUL DEVELOPERS | Cancellation of Flat &Refund+interest+Compensation | AUTHORITY | 11/01/2024 |
| BALAN PARAVAVANTAVIDA vs M/S TRISHUL DEVELOPERS | refund and compensatory damages | AUTHORITY | 11/01/2024 |
| Famy Energy Private Limited vs MITTAL PALMS | (a) Return of a total amount of Rs. 2,00,41,398 (Rupees Two Crore Forty One Thousand Three Hundred and Ninety Eight Rupees Only) along with interest calculated at 24% and compensation for delay | AUTHORITY | 06/10/2022 |
| Poorvika & Anoop Rao Kordcal vs MITTAL PALMS | Annexure Attached | AUTHORITY | 03/10/2022 |
| CHOCCKALINGAM KARPAGAVINAYAGAM vs MITTAL PALMS | Cancel booking & refund Rs.49,42,605/- +18% interest for 94 months + Pendent lite interest 12% +Rs.10,00,000/-for mental agony + cost | AUTHORITY | 03/10/2022 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200103/0005130 03-01-2020 | Annexure Attached | MITTAL PALMS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/200106/0005150 06-01-2020 | Claim for compensation under section 31 read with section 71 of the Act | MITTAL PALMS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210119/0007420 19-01-2021 | Endless delay in Completion of the Project since “JUNE 2014”. As on the date of filing of this Complaint by the applicants, there has been delay of more than 6 and half years. Developer does not have | MITTAL PALMS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220420/0009371 20-04-2022 | REFUND OF PAYMENT AND COMPENSATION DUE DELAY IN HANDING OVER | MITTAL PALMS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220711/0009738 11-07-2022 | Endless delay in completion of the project since " June -2014". As on date of the filling this Complaint there has been delay of more than 8 years. | MITTAL PALMS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220822/0009926 22-08-2022 | COMPLAINT UNDER SECTIONS 12, 18, 19, 31,71 &72, R/W Rule 30 - seeking compensation | MITTAL PALMS | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/220921/0010035 21-09-2022 | Complaint | MITTAL PALMS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221007/0010058 07-10-2022 | Form O for compensation- ----- already filed Form O for refund filed under CMP/220420/0009371 | MITTAL PALMS | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹35.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK MG ROAD (IFSC KKBK0008066, a/c …7032). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 5 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 5 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 13 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 16 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 19 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 20 km |
| Electronic City | 28 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.