K-RERA · the public record
RAMKY ONE NORTH PHASE-3
Bengaluru North · RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
0.7registered acres
78.6registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for RAMKY ONE NORTH PHASE-3
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/171118/001475
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 52 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 120 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 2,677 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~3.04 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈8,139 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 2,677 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 52 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-07-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apartment Flats | 1 | 100% | 120 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-BLOCK | 12 | 52 | 52 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 52 official flat/unit rows, matching the 52 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 50 | 113.7-116.0 sqm | 40.8-47.0 sqm | 50 |
| 2BHK | 2 | 78.0-116.0 sqm | 29.4-41.5 sqm | 2 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-BLOCK | 52 | 78.0-116.0 sqm | 29.4-47.0 sqm | 52 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | A-BLOCK | 0 | 3BHK | 116.0 sqm | 41.5 sqm | 1 |
| 002 | A-BLOCK | 0 | 3BHK | 116.0 sqm | 41.5 sqm | 1 |
| 003 | A-BLOCK | 0 | 2BHK | 78.0 sqm | 29.4 sqm | 1 |
| 004 | A-BLOCK | 0 | 3BHK | 113.7 sqm | 40.8 sqm | 1 |
| 101 | A-BLOCK | 1 | 3BHK | 116.0 sqm | 42.8 sqm | 1 |
| 102 | A-BLOCK | 1 | 3BHK | 116.0 sqm | 42.8 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
1 of 16 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 15 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Sep 2018, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Sep 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 11 Jul 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/220711/001475) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (14 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| M S RAMANUJAN vs RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS LTD | Direct builder to obtain OC within a timeline. | AUTHORITY | 15/09/2025 |
| Rekha Kannan vs RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS LTD | Complainant is seeking RERA's intervention to ensure the prompt issuance of the Occupancy Certificate (OC) by the builder. | AUTHORITY | 15/09/2025 |
| Abhishek Chaurasiya vs RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS LTD | Seeking RERA's intervention to ensure the prompt issuance of the Occupancy Certificate (OC) by the builder | AUTHORITY | 15/09/2025 |
| VIDYADHAR DURGEKAR vs RAMKY ONE NORTH PHASE-3 | All the above points | AUTHORITY | 13/11/2019 |
| VIDYADHAR DURGEKAR vs RAMKY ONE NORTH PHASE-3 | STP design as per KSPCB Guide & Survey of land | AUTHORITY | 13/11/2019 |
| Devraj Gandhi vs RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS LTD | Payment of interest on delayed handover | AUTHORITY | 10/08/2026 |
| Subhashish Paul vs Ramky Estates and Farms Limited | Request RERA's intervention to ensure the prompt issuance of the Occupancy Certificate (OC) by the builder | AUTHORITY | 09/05/2025 |
| Anu K Pillai vs Ramky Estates and Farms Limited | Try to help us to get the OC from the builder | AUTHORITY | 09/05/2025 |
| Devraj Gandhi vs RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS LTD | 1. To allow Ramky One North Apartment Owners Cooperative Society Ltd to collect monthly maintenance subscription from the members and others to carry out the maintenance of the apartment common area, | AUTHORITY | 06/11/2024 |
| Santosh Kumar vs RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS LTD | TAKING OVER MAINTENANCE , CONVEYANCE OF LAND AND CORPUS FUND FROM THE BUILDER ETC | AUTHORITY | 06/11/2024 |
| Nirupama Nagaraj vs RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS LTD | HANDING OVER OF MAINTENANCE AND CONVEYANCE AND CORPUS FUND 4.COMPLETION OF PENDING COMPLIANCE INCLUDING AND NOT LIMITED TO EC,CFE,CFO AND OC 5.REOPENING OF ALL ACCOUNTS FOR AUDITS INCLUDING GST etc | AUTHORITY | 06/11/2024 |
| Seema Nair vs RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS LTD | To allow Ramky One North Apartment Owners Cooperative Society Ltd to collect monthly maintenance subscription from the members and others to carry out the maintenance of the apartment and conveyance | AUTHORITY | 06/11/2024 |
| AMIT KUMAR SINGH vs RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS LTD | PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON DELAYED HANDING OVER | AUTHORITY | 06/05/2026 |
| Chandrasekhara Goud Jeeriganur vs RAMKY ESTATES AND FARMS LTD | Seeking RERA's intervention to ensure the prompt issuance of the Occupancy Certificate (OC) by the builder | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190314/0002374 14-03-2019 | Property survey/Landshare/STP/Delay in handing over | RAMKY ONE NORTH PHASE-3 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190529/0003174 29-05-2019 | STP & SURVEY | RAMKY ONE NORTH PHASE-3 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Jamuna Chalam | - | 2004 | S.T.Bed, Koramangala IV th Block.Bengalore |
| Contractor | M/s.Ramky Infrastructure Ltd | - | 1994 | Gachibowli, Hyderabad |
| Structural engineer | Prakash B V | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingRamky Estates has 2 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 97%). 1 is past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹47.3 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank Madhapur (IFSC ICIC0000040, a/c …0217). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 12 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 12 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 16 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 18 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 26 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 27 km |
| Electronic City | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.