Bangalore/Project record

K-RERA · the public record

RAMKY ONE NORTH PHASE-4

Bengaluru North · Ramky Estates and Farms

Project Review · example purchase

Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.

Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.

From another project · Prestige Park Grove

Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.

Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.

Read the Project Review sample ↗
Prestige Park Grove Project Review · first page
First page of the complete sample.
30 Sep 2018declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
80registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026

Free project details

Registration read 25 Oct 2026

Registered units and project size

APARTMENT FLATS
8

Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026

The whole registration

1.3registered acres

64.0registered units per acre

The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.

RERA details for RAMKY ONE NORTH PHASE-4

K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/171031/001459

Project facts and comparisons

On the register

Declared completion30 September 2018
Land area5,059 sq m (1.3 acres)
Homes registered80
Tower/wing entries2
Unit mix8 × APARTMENT FLATS

In context

Density64 homes per acre
Density in context36th percentile of 529 Bengaluru North projects (median 75.3)

Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.

Project areas, parking and inventory

Project areas and parking

RERA filing
DisclosureOfficial valueWhy it matters
Registered units80Total inventory registered with K-RERA.
Official carpet area96 sqmTotal carpet area reported for the project.
Registered land area5,059 sqmThe land area attached to this K-RERA registration.
Sanctioned FAR/FSI~1.75Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈8,833 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 5,059 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build.
Registered tower/wing entries2Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page.
Parking total (reconciled)80Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Open-parking field0Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Garage field0Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Project start date01-10-2015

Official inventory & towers

RERA filing

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

Registered inventory mix

TypeUnitsShareOfficial carpet area
APARTMENT FLATS8100%96 sqm

Registered tower / wing summary

Tower/wingFloorsUnitsParkingHeight
D-Block44040-
E-Block44040-

Official unit register

RERA filing

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 80 official flat/unit rows, matching the 80 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

By unit type

Unit typeRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
2 BHK2479.6-84.9 sqm42.7-43.8 sqm24
3 BHK2079.6-100.7 sqm42.9-52.2 sqm20
2 BHK +Terrace1279.6 sqm42.9-44.2 sqm12
2 BHK+ Terrace1296.3 sqm42.7-52.2 sqm12
2BHK496.3 sqm50.9 sqm4
3 BHK+ Terrace496.3 sqm43.4-51.6 sqm4
3 BHK+Terrace479.6 sqm43.4-43.6 sqm4

By tower / wing

Tower/wingRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
D-Block4079.6 sqm42.7-52.2 sqm40
E-Block4082.3-100.7 sqm42.7-52.2 sqm40
Show sample official unit rows
UnitTowerFloorTypeCarpetUDSParking
D1-001D-Block02 BHK79.6 sqm42.7 sqm1
D1-002D-Block02 BHK79.6 sqm42.7 sqm1
D1-003D-Block03 BHK79.6 sqm50.9 sqm1
D1-004D-Block03 BHK79.6 sqm50.9 sqm1
D2-001D-Block02 BHK +Terrace79.6 sqm42.9 sqm1
D2-002D-Block02 BHK +Terrace79.6 sqm42.9 sqm1

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

Litigation & compliance

RERA filing

Litigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.

1 of 17 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 16 slots have usable uploaded filings.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Sep 2018, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Sep 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 11 Jul 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/220711/001459) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.

Approval documents

Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority

A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.

K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)

⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.

K-RERA complaint orders (4 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)

PartiesRelief soughtDisposalOrder date
Anshuman Dwivedi vs Ramky Estates and Farms LimitedComplainant is seeking RERA's intervention to ensure the prompt issuance of the Occupancy Certificate (OC) even post Society formationAUTHORITY09/05/2025
K Swaminathan vs Ramky Estates and Farms LimitedPlease instruct Builder to procure the OC and submit to meAUTHORITY09/05/2025
Anu K Pillai vs Ramky Estates and Farms LimitedI humbly request that you consider issuing a stay order to halt all activities related to the handover/takeover of the project from the promoter until the project receives Occupancy Certificate (OC).AUTHORITY06/05/2026
Deepa Nayak vs Ramky Estates and Farms LimitedPayment of delayed interest(The Fact of the Complaint can not be edited for changing to Delayed interest.Please read compensation as interest)AUTHORITY06/05/2026

⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.

Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)

ComplaintSubject (as filed)ProjectStatus
CMP/190314/0002374
14-03-2019
Property survey/Landshare/STP/Delay in handing overRAMKY ONE NORTH PHASE-3 (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY
CMP/190529/0003174
29-05-2019
STP & SURVEYRAMKY ONE NORTH PHASE-3 (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY

Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.

Project team & certifications

RERA filing

K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

RoleNameRegistration / licenceSinceLocality
ArchitectJamuna Chalam-2004S.T.Bed, Koramangala IV th Block.Bengalore
ContractorM/s.Ramky Infrastructure Ltd-1994Gachibowli, Hyderabad
Structural engineerPrakash B V---

Builder track record

RERA filing

Ramky Estates has 2 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 97%). 1 is past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.

Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.

Financials & Construction Progress

Financial disclosures

RERA filing

⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹33.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.

RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank MADHAPUR (IFSC ICIC0000040, a/c …0217). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

Construction photo filings

RERA filing

K-RERA has 2 project-photo uploads.

These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.

Location & Connectivity

The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 12 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.

LandmarkStraight-line
Outer Ring Road / Manyata12 km
Kempegowda Int'l Airport16 km
MG Road / city centre18 km
Bellandur–Marathahalli belt26 km
Whitefield IT hub27 km
Electronic City34 km

Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.

Free · Watch this project

We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.

Something went wrong — email hello@quietlist.in.

✓ You're watching — we'll email you if the RERA record changes.

Built by Ramky Estates. View Ramky Estates's full track record →
Ramky Estates has 3 projects registered in Bangalore, 1 completed.
11 complaints on the K-RERA register against Ramky Estates in Bangalore.

Other projects by this builder in Bangalore

Ramky ONE Karnival
Filing overdue · 97% built · 77% sold
Ramky ONE North Phase-3
No filings

Other RERA-registered projects in Yelahanka

Major developers building in Yelahanka

Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.

Registration last seen on RERA: 25 Oct 2026. Document and inventory dates are shown in their sections.